Combined Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks at the Knee

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelius M. Donohue ◽  
Larry R. Goss ◽  
Samuel Metz ◽  
Michael S. Weingarten ◽  
Larry B. Dyal

Peripheral nerve blocks at the ankle have long been used for foot surgery. However, when local foot and ankle blocks are inappropriate or contraindicated, general and spinal anesthesia are the common alternatives. Both have disadvantages and require added equipment and monitors. Combined popliteal and saphenous nerve blocks at the knee can offer a desirable alternative to general and spinal anesthesia for foot and ankle surgery. In addition, popliteal and saphenous nerve blocks provide anesthesia of the entire lower leg, thus permitting a greater variety of procedures to be performed. This article reviews the anatomical considerations, various block techniques, and surgical applications of this useful approach to lower-leg anesthesia. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(4): 368–374, 2004)

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473011416S0008
Author(s):  
Grace C. Kunas ◽  
Jodie Curren ◽  
Carey Ford ◽  
Kara Fields ◽  
Jacques YaDeau ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques T. YaDeau ◽  
Kara G. Fields ◽  
Richard L. Kahn ◽  
Vincent R. LaSala ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Sparks ◽  
T. Higeleo

Combined tibial and common peroneal nerve anaesthesia was used for foot and ankle surgery in fifty-six adults. Where necessary, the saphenous nerve was also blocked. A calibrated constant current nerve stimulator was used to localise the nerves in the popliteal fossa. Using lignocaine 1%, an opioid premedication, but no other sedation or top-up injection, 60% of the blocks were successful. If a patient felt pain at incision or during surgery, the block was recorded as a failure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 731-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Uk Park ◽  
Jae Ho Cho ◽  
Doo Hyung Lee ◽  
Wan Sun Choi ◽  
Han Dong Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Single or combined multiple-site peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are becoming popular for patients undergoing surgery on their feet or ankles. These procedures are known to be generally safe in surgical settings compared with other forms of anesthesia, such as spinal block. The purposes of this study were to assess the incidence of complications after the administration of multiple PNBs for foot and ankle surgery and to compare the rates of complications between patients who received a single PNB and those who received multiple blocks. Methods: Charts were reviewed retrospectively to assess peri- and postoperative complications possibly related to the PNBs. The records of 827 patients who had received sciatic nerve blocks, femoral nerve blocks adductor canal blocks, or combinations of these for foot and/or ankle surgery were analyzed for complications. The collected data consisted of age, sex, body mass index, presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking history, tourniquet time, and complications both immediately postoperatively and 1 year later. Results: Of these 827 patients, 92 (11.1%) developed neurologic symptoms after surgery; 22 (2.7%) of these likely resulted from the nerve blocks, and 7 (0.8%) of these were unresolved after the patients’ last follow-up visits. There were no differences in complication rates between combined blocks and single sciatic nerve blocks. Conclusion: There were more complications, both transient and long term, after anesthetic PNBs than previous literature has reported. Combined multiple-site blocks did not increase the rate of neurologic complications. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0024
Author(s):  
Leah Herzog ◽  
Sylvia H. Wilson ◽  
Christopher E. Gross

Category: Ankle; Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Peripheral nerve blocks have become an integral part of orthopedic surgery to assist with postoperative pain. However, 40% of patients who undergo a peripheral nerve block will experience rebound pain, which in turn, long-acting narcotics may be able to block. Unfortunately, this rebound pain can cancel out the potential benefits of decreased opioid medication use. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the difference in patient reported pain scores in those patients whom received long-acting opioid pain medication and those who did not. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patient-reported pain scores for 96 patients who underwent a peripheral nerve block for outpatient foot and ankle surgery. 48 patients either received three days of long-acting opioids or did not. Each patient was asked to fill out and return a pain diary as well as fill out a pain catastrophizing survey (PCS) at their postoperative appointment. The pain diary discussed their Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, amount of pain medication, and time they took the medicine. This data was then collected and compared via paired student t-tests for evaluation of significance. Results: Pain diaries were completed by 69 patients (72%). There were no significant differences between those comorbidities, types of procedures, age, or BMI between the groups. Mean postoperative pain scores did not differ between patients that did and did not receive postoperative extended release opioid medications (p = 0.226). Mean opioid consumption did not differ between groups (p = 0.945). There were no correlations between daily reported pain scores or the postoperative day with the highest pain score for those who received long acting opioid pain medication versus those who did not (r=0.336, p=0.550). Conclusion: Rebound pain is a difficult potential side effect of peripheral nerve blocks that currently does not have a preventative measure. This study was an attempted effort to help eliminate rebound pain, but there did not appear to be a significant benefit to adding long-acting opioid pain medication in addition to the peripheral nerve block and short-acting pain medication


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Austin Sanders ◽  
Akash Gupta ◽  
Mackenzie Jones ◽  
Matthew Roberts ◽  
David Levine ◽  
...  

Category: Pain Management, Anesthetic Advances Introduction/Purpose: The number of opioid prescriptions in the United States has significantly increased over the past 20 years, including those given after low-risk surgery. Unintentional opioid overdoses have also dramatically risen. Excess pills are widely acknowledged as a source of diversion, which accounts for up to 40% of opioid-related overdoses. In the foot and ankle literature, there are no studies looking at the quantity of pain medications that should be prescribed following outpatient surgery. Furthermore, with the increasing use of peripheral nerve blocks, their effect on quantities of narcotics needed after these surgeries have not been explored. This study aims to determine prescribing patterns for common outpatient foot and ankle surgery and whether patients are over or under-prescribed opioids and if so, by how much. Methods: 57 patients undergoing outpatient foot and ankle surgeries were prospectively enrolled. Patients received a spinal neuraxial block and a long-acting popliteal peripheral nerve block, and did not receive ketorolac perioperatively. Patients were excluded if they had a history of chronic pain, or were currently using opioids or muscle relaxers. Enrolled patients received a standard post-operative prescription regimen of 60 tablets of narcotics, 3 days of scheduled ibuprofen, aspirin 81 mg twice a day (or alternate based on risk factors) for DVT prophylaxis, and ondansetron taken as needed. Patients used a pain diary to record when their block wore off and the quantity of narcotic taken. They received surveys at post-operative day (POD) 3, 7, and 14 detailing how many days they took the medication and how many pills were consumed, how their actual pain compared to their expected level of pain, and if they were satisfied with their pain control. Results: At POD 3, compared to their expected level of pain 36 patients had less pain, 15 had the same pain, and 3 had more pain than expected. The mean pain score was 4. Patients first started feeling the block wear off at 0.9 days. Patients averaged 10.3 pills of narcotics in the first 3 days and rated their overall satisfaction with pain control at 8.5. Between days 4-7, patients took an average of 7 pills, and on POD 7, 22 patients were still taking narcotics. At POD 14, patients experienced 74.4% relief of pain compared to their expected pain, and rated their overall satisfaction at 8.2. Patients had an average of 33.5 remaining pills on POD 14 and 13 patients (22.8%) were still taking narcotics. Conclusion: Patients receiving spinal and long-acting popliteal blocks, followed by the prescription regimen described above had excellent pain control after outpatient foot and ankle surgeries. Patients had a high level of satisfaction with their pain control, with many patients describing better pain relief than expected. However, 60 tablets of narcotics were excessive in most cases. We suggest that in patients receiving spinal and long-acting popliteal blocks, 30 tablets of a narcotic would cover the pain needs of most patients. This would provide a small excess in case of need, but would help minimize the risk of narcotic related complications and diversion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document