scholarly journals Experimental research of boresight error correction using returning signals from the illuminated targets through atmosphere

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 024216
Author(s):  
Tan Yi ◽  
Geng Chao ◽  
Li Xin-Yang ◽  
Luo Wen ◽  
Luo Qi
2013 ◽  
Vol 753-755 ◽  
pp. 3029-3032
Author(s):  
Xiao Wei Zhang ◽  
Qiao Ling Xie

In recent years large corporations as well as smaller commercial enterprises have begun to devote increased attention to system error correction and system quality. This paper introduces a novel toolthe Structure for Information System Error Correction (SISEC), implemented by the author and applicable for auto-generation of data. The paper discusses system requirements, design, architecture and modes of operation. It also contains a detailed comparison of the SISEC structure with existing confirming environments, focusing in particular on the SACK/SACX structure. The final section is devoted to experimental research into the availability of the presented tools in various projects and configurations, as reflected by quality examination.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 0422005
Author(s):  
赵春竹 Zhao Chunzhu ◽  
崔庆丰 Cui Qingfeng

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (13) ◽  
pp. 139501
Author(s):  
Zhou Long-Feng ◽  
Zhang Ang ◽  
Zhang Jun-Bo ◽  
Fan Xin-Long ◽  
Wei Ling ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew

This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 805-805
Author(s):  
Roger E. Kirk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document