scholarly journals CLUSTER POLICIES AND INITIATIVES WITHIN THE SERVICE SECTOR – GOOD PRACTICES FROM EU COUNTRIES AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CZECH CLUSTER POLICY

Author(s):  
Martin Horák
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-207
Author(s):  
Walentyna Kwiatkowska

The role of the service sector in the economy is increasing in the process of socio-economic development. This tendency has been confirmed and explained by the three-sector theory formulated by A.G.B. Fisher, C. Clark, and J. Fourastie. The main goal of the paper is to show development tendencies in service sectors in Poland and the EU countries and assess them in view of the three-sector theory. The share of the service sector in the total employment and in the total gross value added in the years 2005-2013/2014 will be analysed together with two sub-sectors including market and non-market services. The research shows that the share of the service sector in total employment and total gross value added has been recently increasing in Poland as well as in other EU countries, but there is a gap in this process between Poland and the most developed EU countries. Moreover, in Poland, the role of market services has been recently increasing much faster than the role of non-market services. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-22
Author(s):  
Joanna Wyszkowska‑Kuna

Economic development has resulted in structural transformation towards economies based on services, which has raised some concerns about the limited opportunities for sustaining productivity growth. The aim of this paper is to examine total factor productivity (TFP) growth in the service sector in comparison with total industries and the manufacturing sector, as well as within the service sector. The study is based on the data from the EU‑KLEMS database (2017), and it covers the years 1995–2015. It refers to EU countries, making it possible to carry out a comparative analysis between countries, in particular between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states. The study demonstrates that productivity growth in services was significantly lower than in manufacturing, but compared with total industries, the disparity was not significant. Productivity growth was usually higher in the ‘new’ EU countries than in the ‘old’ ones, except for information and communications services, which, on the whole, were the main driving force behind the productivity growth in services.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Halaskova ◽  
Renata Halaskova ◽  
Viktor Prokop

Over the past 40 years, the service sector has become the dominant area of market economies. The public sector and services financed from public financing represent a specific group within the services sector. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency of EU countries and find the extent to which the volume of public services (and the respective financial allocations) can have an impact on selected economic indicators. To this end, the efficiency of public expenditure in five areas of public services (general public services; health; education; social protection; and recreation, culture, and religion) in 2009 and 2016 was evaluated in relation to selected economic indicators (GDP per capita and employment in services). In addition, the efficiency of public expenditure in EU countries was evaluated in relation to the size of the public sector and traditions of public administration. For cross-country analyses within the 27 European countries, data envelopment analysis and the input-oriented variable returns to scale (VRS) model were applied. The results demonstrated that in 2009, 13 out of 27 countries were efficient as opposed to 2016, where only seven countries were efficient. In countries with bigger size of public sector, the efficiency of public expenditure on services was not established. However, there was a similarity in the efficiency of public expenditure on services between groups of EU countries regarding the tradition of public administration.


Author(s):  
Владимир Пастухов ◽  
Vladimir Pastuhov

The author considers the basics of clustering a foreign economy, the priorities of the cluster policy of the Russian Federation. The activity of the Center for Cluster Development “Technopark of High Technologies” as a coordinating center for the development of a cluster economy of Khanty-Mansiisk Autonomous District is analyzed. The Center adheres to the unshakable foundations of cluster policy, based on the organization of interaction between government bodies and local self-government, business structures and scientific and educational institutions in order to increase the innovativeness of production and the service sector of the district clusters. The role of the Center for Cluster Development in interacting with other district clusters and partners is estimated. The author believes that mutual cooperation will help to find optimal ways for the further effective development of clusters of Khanty-Mansiisk Autonomous District in the long term. The introduction of innovative technologies in the district clusters (oil and gas and oil and gas processing clusters, forestry and mining, medical, tourist and recreational clusters, the Technics and Technologies for the North cluster, and the scientific and innovative cluster) will ensure a synergistic effect of the economic activity of a wide range of regional territorial enterprises.


2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
A. Egorov ◽  
A. Petrovskiy

The article is devoted to the analysis of key social and economic problems in the EU countries during the initial period of the pandemic. Forced isolation amid the spread of the coronavirus contributed to the growth of domestic and domestic violence, manifestations of racism and xenophobia in the EU. Social discrimination manifested itself in the restriction of access to goods and services for people with Asian appearance. A negative factor was the statements of certain right-wing politicians, as well as a number of media outlets. The member states of the European Union sought to carry out proactive communication with the population of their countries, convincing the latter to use exclusively official information about the situation with the COVID 19 virus and taking steps to ensure the widespread presence of the opinion of the governance in the media and on the Internet. Due to the extraordinary circumstances, EU member states have resumed controls at their internal borders in an effort to ensure the safety of their citizens. Despite assurances from the European Commission that the restrictions would not affect the interests of the EU population and third-country nationals, in March 2020, tangible obstacles arose in the way of realizing the fundamental right to free movement. The first steps were taken to support the sectors of the economy and the employment market in the initial phase of the pandemic. Particular attention was paid to the state of affairs in the most vulnerable service sector. The employment market experienced serious shocks, which was reflected in the growth of unemployment in the EU countries. The measures taken by the authorities of the member states, in general, met the interests of workers, but encountered difficulties in the course of implementation.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gema Pérez-Rojo ◽  
C. Noriega ◽  
C. Velasco ◽  
J. López
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document