25. Compensatory Education for Disadvantaged Children

1982 ◽  
pp. 257-269
Author(s):  
Craig T. Ramey ◽  
Frances A. Campbell
1977 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Becker

In late 1967, Project Follow Through was reorganized to select, test, and evaluate promising but different educational programs for disadvantaged youngsters in the first three grades. Now, nearly ten years later, the completed evaluations of Follow Through suggest that one of these programs, the University of Oregon's Direct Instruction Model, has produced significant gains in measures of positive affect, basic skills, and conceptual reasoning. In this article, Wesley Becker discusses the distinctive features of this model—its underlying assumptions and basic teaching components. He then explores the implications of teaching reading and language skills to economically disadvantaged children and advocates that immediate steps be taken to teach vocabulary systematically throughout the school years. Viewing this goal as essential for compensatory education, he concludes with an analysis of how vocabulary instruction might best be implemented.


1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
R. Z. Swaab

These extracts are from a discussion paper by Mr. Swaab, under the same title, presented at the Council of Europe sponsored Workshop on Action Research Concerning Compensatory Education for Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Children with Particular Regard to Preschool and Primary Education in Strasbourg, France, 7-11 October 1974. The full text will be published in the Proceedings of the Workshop later this year.


1979 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig T. Ramey ◽  
Frances A. Campbell

1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Jean LeTendre

Chapter 1 is now in its 26th year of providing supplementary educational services to low-achieving children who live in low-income neighborhoods. The program has shown positive but not significant gains in the achievement of educationally disadvantaged children. In 1988, Congress reauthorized Chapter 1 with the mandate to the nation’s schools to close the gap between low- and high-achieving students, stressing accountability for performance, program improvement, and flexibility to produce results. Chapter 1 faces reauthorization again in 1993. The author provides perspectives on a number of issues that should be considered in the coming dialogue on the future of Chapter 1.


1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 572-573
Author(s):  
HUBERTO MOLINA

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance N. Swander ◽  
Gladys R. Blankenship ◽  
Herbert Yahraes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document