scholarly journals The Bajocian to Kimmeridgian (Middle to Upper Jurassic) ammonite succession at Sentralbanken High (core 7533/3-U-1), Barents Sea, and its stratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical significance

2020 ◽  
Vol XVIII (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Wierzbowski ◽  
◽  
Morten Smelror ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic

Finnmark Platform Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, Barents Sea

2021 ◽  
pp. M57-2020-20
Author(s):  
E. Henriksen ◽  
D. Ktenas ◽  
J. K. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Sea Bottom ◽  
Middle Carboniferous ◽  
Uralian Orogen ◽  
Glacial Periods

AbstractThe Finnmark Platform Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element (CTSE), located in the southern Barents Sea, is a northward-dipping monoclinal structural unit. It covers most of the southern Norwegian Barents Sea where it borders the Norwegian Mainland. Except for the different age of basement, the CTSE extends eastwards into the Kola Monocline on the Russian part of the Barents Sea.The general water depth varies between 200-350 m, and the sea bottom is influenced by Plio-Pleistocene glaciations. A high frequency of scour marks and deposition of moraine materials exists on the platform areas. Successively older strata sub-crop below the Upper Regional Unconformity (URU, which was) formed by several glacial periods.Basement rocks of Neoproterozoic age are heavily affected by the Caledonian Orogeny, and previously by the Timanide tectonic compression in the easternmost part of the Finnmark Platform CTSE.Depth to crystalline basement varies considerably and is estimated to be from 4-5 to 10 km. Following the Caledonian orogenesis, the Finnmark Platform was affected by Lower to Middle Carboniferous rifting, sediment input from the Uralian Orogen in the east, the Upper Jurassic / Lower Cretaceous rift phase and the Late Plio-Pleistocene isostatic uplift.A total of 8 exploration wells drilled different targets on the platform. Two minor discoveries have been made proving presence of both oil and gas and potential sandstone reservoirs of good quality identified in the Visean, Induan, Anisian and Carnian intervals. In addition, thick sequences of Perm-Carboniferous carbonates and spiculitic chert are proven in the eastern Platform area. The deep reservoirs are believed to be charged from Paleozoic sources. A western extension of the Domanik source rocks well documented in the Timan-Pechora Basin may exist towards the eastern part of the Finnmark Platform. In the westernmost part, charge from juxtaposed down-faulted basins may be possible.

Glendonites from Mesozoic succession of eastern Barents sea: distribution, genesis and paleoclimatic implications

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kseniya Mikhailova ◽  
Victoria Ershova ◽  
Mikhail Rogov ◽  
Boris Pokrovsky ◽  
Oleg Vereshchagin
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Calcium Carbonate ◽  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Early Cretaceous ◽  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Anaerobic Oxidation Of Methane ◽  
Oxidation Of Methane

<p>Glendonites often used as paleoclimate indicator of cold near-bottom temperature, as these are calcite pseudomorphs of ikaite, a metastable calcium carbonate hexahydrate, precipitates mostly under low temperature (mainly from 0-4<sup>o</sup>C) and may be stabilized by high phosphate concentrations that occurs due to anaerobic oxidation of methane and/or organic matter; dissolved organic carbon, sulfates and amino acid may contribute ikaite formation as well.  Therefore, glendonites-bearing host rocks frequently include glacial deposits that make them useful as a paleoclimate indicator of near-freezing temperature.</p><p>Our study is based on material collected from five wells drilled in eastern Barents Sea: Severo-Murmanskaya, Ledovaya – 1,2; Ludlovskaya – 1,2. The studied glendonites, mainly represented by relatively small rhombohedral pseudomorphs (0,5-2 cm) and rarely by stellate aggregates, collected from Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous shallow marine clastic deposits. They scattered distributed throughout succession. Totally 18 samples of glendonites were studied. The age of host-bearing rocks were defined by fossils: bivalves or ammonites, microfossils or dinoflagellate. Bajocian-Bathonian glendonites were collected from Ledovaya – 1 and Ludlovskaya – 1 and 2 wells; in addition to these occurrences Middle Jurassic glendonites are known also in boreholes drilled at Shtockmanovskoe field. Numerous ‘jarrowite-like’ glendonites of the Middle Volgian (~ latest early Tithonian) age were sampled from Severo-Murmanskaya well. Unique Late Barremian glendonites were found in Ledovaya – 2 well.</p><p>δ<sup>18</sup>O values of Middle Jurassic glendonite concretions range from – 5.4 to –1.7 ‰ Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB); for Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous δ<sup>18</sup>O values range from – 4.3 to –1.6 ‰ VPDB; for Lower Cretaceous - δ<sup>18</sup>O values range from – 4.5 to –3.4 ‰ VPDB. Carbon isotope composition for Middle Jurassic glendonite concretions δ<sup>13</sup>C values range from – 33.3 to –22.6 ‰ VPDB; for Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous δ<sup>13</sup>C values range from – 25.1 to –18.4 ‰ VPDB; for Lower Cretaceous - δ<sup>13</sup>C values range from – 30.1 to –25.6 ‰ VPDB.</p><p>Based on δ<sup>18</sup>O data we supposed that seawater had a strong influence on ikaite-derived calcite precipitation. Received data coincide with δ<sup>18</sup>O values reported from other Mesozoic glendonites and Quaternary glendonites formed in cold environments. Values of δ<sup>13</sup>C of glendonites are close to bacterial sulfate reduction and/or anaerobic oxidation of methane or organic matter. Glendonites consist of carbonates forming a number of phases which different in phosphorus and magnesium content. Mg-bearing calcium carbonate and dolomite both include framboidal pyrite, which can indicate (1) lack of strong rock transformations activity and (2) presence of sulfate-reduction bacteria in sediments.</p><p>To conclude, Mesozoic climate was generally warm and studied concretions indicate cold climate excursion in Middle Jurassic, Upper Jurassic-Early Cretaceous and Early Cretaceous.</p><p> </p><p>The study was supported by RFBR, project number 20-35-70012.</p>

Why does not lithology correlate with gamma-ray spikes in the shaley source rocks of the Upper Jurassic Alge Member (southwestern Barents Sea)?

2020 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 104623
Author(s):  
Solveig Helleren ◽  
Dora Marín ◽  
Sverre Ohm ◽  
Carita Augustsson ◽  
Alejandro Escalona
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks

Petroleum Basins of the Soviet Arctic

1980 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Meyerhoff
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Chukchi Sea ◽  
The United States ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Shelf Area ◽  
The West ◽  
Pechora Basin

SummaryThe Soviet Arctic extends 6700 km from the border with Norway, on the west, to the border with the United States, on the east. The region contains the largest unexplored shelf area on earth – approximately 3917000 km2. Of the several onshore petroleum-bearing basins, at least two extend into the offshore – the Timano-Pechora basin, which passes beneath the Barents Sea, and the West Siberian basin, which includes much of the Kara Sea. The Laptev and East Siberian Seas seem to be underlain by separate offshore basins, possibly unrelated to any onshore. The Chukchi Sea is geologically a part of the Alaskan North Slope. The Vilyuy basin, along the Vilyuy and Lena Rivers, does not extend offshore. Only small basins are present along the Pacific shore; of these, two have petroleum potential – the Khatyrka basin which passes eastwards into the Navarin basin of the Bering Sea, and the Anadyr' basin which joins the St Lawrence basin. Peripheral to the Arctic, but of great importance relative to several Canadian Arctic basins, is the Irkutsk amphitheatre in which the main hydrocarbon accumulations are Proterozoic.Of the three largest onshore basins, the West Siberian is the greatest, with major production from Lower and Middle Cretaceous, and smaller production from Upper Jurassic and Upper Palaeozoic rocks. The major production from the Timano-Pechora basin is from the Middle Devonian and Upper Carboniferous–Lower Permian; minor production is from the Silurian, Lower Devonian, Upper Devonian, Lower Carboniferous, Upper Permian and Triassic. Production in the Vilyuy basin – all of it gas – is from Lower and Middle Jurassic, Triassic and Permian. Although non-commercial, known potential production from the Nordvik area is from Triassic and Permian sandstones; that from the Khatyrka basin is Oligocene and that from the Anadyr' basin is Miocene. The potential of the Soviet Arctic is huge, with major oil reserves and the largest known gas reserves on the earth.

Re-Os identification of glide faulting and precise ages for correlation from the Upper Jurassic Hekkingen Formation, southwestern Barents Sea

2017 ◽  
Vol 466 ◽  
pp. 209-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Markey ◽  
H.J. Stein ◽  
J.L. Hannah ◽  
S.V. Georgiev ◽  
J.H. Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic

scholarly journals The Jurassic of Kuhn Ø, North-East Greenland

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 865-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per C. Alsgaard ◽  
Vince L. Felt ◽  
Henrik Vosgerau ◽  
Finn Surlyk
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Shallow Marine ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
Base Level ◽  
North East ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Lower Unit

The Middle–Upper Jurassic succession of Kuhn Ø, North-East Greenland accumulated in a major half-graben and is an excellent analogue for the subsurface of the mid-Norwegian shelf. On Kuhn Ø, peneplaned crystalline basement was incised by a drainage system during a major base-level lowstand, probably in late Early or early Middle Jurassic times. It was filled with fluvial conglomerates of the newly defined Middle Jurassic Bastians Dal Formation during subsequent base-level rise. As sea level continued to rise, precursor-peat of the coals of the Muslingebjerg Formation formed in swamps which covered the conglomerates and filled the remaining space of the incised valley system. The valley and interfluve areas were flooded in Late Bathonian – Callovian times and tidally-dominated, shallow marine sandstones of the Pelion Formation were deposited on top of the valley fill and over the adjacent basement peneplain. These sandstones are overlain by the newly defined shallow marine Oxfordian Payer Dal Formation which is subdivided into a lower unit and an upper unit, separated by a major drowning surface. The Payer Dal Formation sands were flooded in the Late Jurassic and organic-rich, offshore mudstones of the Bernbjerg Formation were deposited. The Jurassic succession of Kuhn Ø can thus be subdivided into large-scale sedimentary units separated by major drowning surfaces. They are of regional extent, and in combination with biostratigraphic and 87Sr/86Sr isotope data they allow the correlation of the sedimentary units on Kuhn Ø with more offshore deposits to the south in Wollaston Forland and more landwards successions to the north in Hochstetter Forland. Petrographically, the trough cross-bedded sandstones of the Pelion Formation and the lower unit of the Payer Dal Formation include both calcite-cemented and poorly cemented quartz sandstones. The calcite cement was derived from dissolution of abundant calcareous fossils and forms concretionary horizons. The upper unit of the Payer Dal Formation mainly consists of weaklycemented quartz sandstones with porosities around 30%. The sandstones of the Pelion and Payer Dal Formations on Kuhn Ø are petrographically very similar to Jurassic sandstones from the mid- Norwegian shelf and the Barents Sea with regard to original mineralogical composition, sorting and grain size. The Bernbjerg Formation mudstones are comparable to the Upper Jurassic source rock of the mid-Norwegian shelf and the Barents Sea, but have lower hydrogen index (HI) values due to terrigenous input in a relatively proximal setting. Coals of the Muslingebjerg Formation have significant source rock potential with measured HI values up to 700, kerogen types II–III and total organic carbon (TOC) values above 50%.

scholarly journals Structural reconstructions of the Eastern Barents Sea at Meso-Tertiary evolution and influence on petroleum potential

Georesursy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Anna A. Suslova ◽  
Antonina V. Stoupakova ◽  
Alina V. Mordasova ◽  
Roman S. Sautkin
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
Petroleum Potential ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Novaya Zemlya

Barents Sea basin is the most explored and studied by the regional and petroleum geologists on the Russian Arctic shelf and has approved gas reserves. However, there are many questions in the petroleum exploration, one of them is the structural reconstruction. During its geological evolution, Barents Sea shelf was influenced by the Pre-Novaya Zemlya structural zone that uplifted several times in Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The main goal of the research is to clarify the periods of structural reconstructions of the Eastern Barents shelf and its influence on the petroleum systems of the Barents Sea shelf. A database of regional seismic profiles and offshore borehole data collected over the past decade on the Petroleum Geology Department of the Lomonosov Moscow State University allows to define main unconformities and seismic sequences, to reconstruct the periods of subsidence and uplifts in Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The structural reconstructions on the Eastern Barents Sea in the Triassic-Jurassic boundary led to intensive uplifts and formation of the huge inversion swells, which is expressed in erosional truncation and stratigraphic unconformity in the Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic strata. In the Jurassic period, tectonic subsidence reigned on the shelf, when the uplifts including the highs of Novaya Zemlya were partially flooded and regional clay seal and source rocks – Upper Jurassic «black clays» – deposited on the shelf. The next contraction phase manifested itself as a second impulse of the growth of inversion swells in the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. Cenozoic uplift of the Pre-Novaya Zemlya structural zone and the entire Barents Sea shelf led to significant erosion of the Mesozoic sediments, on the one hand, forming modern structural traps, and on the other, significantly destroying the Albian, once regional seal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document