scholarly journals Association between intrinsic disorder and serine/threonine phosphorylation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gajinder P Singh
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Substrate Recognition ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Protein Disorder ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
Recognition Mechanism ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Regulate Protein ◽  
Disordered Regions

Serine/threonine phosphorylation is an important mechanism to regulate protein function. In eukaryotes phosphorylation occurs predominantly in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. While serine/threonine phosphorylation and protein disorder are much less prevalent in prokaryotes, M. tuberculosis has both high serine/threonine phosphorylation and disorder. Here I show that, similar to eukaryotes, serine/threonine phosphorylation sites in M. tuberculosis are highly enriched in intrinsically disordered regions, indicating similarity in substrate recognition mechanism of eukaryotic and M. tuberculosis kinases. Serine/threonine phosphorylation has been linked to the pathogenicity and survival of M. tuberculosis, thus better understanding of how its kinases recognize their substrates could have important implications in understanding and controlling the biology of this deadly pathogen.

scholarly journals Association between intrinsic disorder and serine/threonine phosphorylation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gajinder P Singh
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Substrate Recognition ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Protein Disorder ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
Recognition Mechanism ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Regulate Protein ◽  
Disordered Regions

Serine/threonine phosphorylation is an important mechanism to regulate protein function. In eukaryotes phosphorylation occurs predominantly in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. While serine/threonine phosphorylation and protein disorder are much less prevalent in prokaryotes, M. tuberculosis has both high serine/threonine phosphorylation and disorder. Here I show that, similar to eukaryotes, serine/threonine phosphorylation sites in M. tuberculosis are highly enriched in intrinsically disordered regions, indicating similarity in substrate recognition mechanism of eukaryotic and M. tuberculosis kinases. Serine/threonine phosphorylation has been linked to the pathogenicity and survival of M. tuberculosis, thus better understanding of how its kinases recognize their substrates could have important implications in understanding and controlling the biology of this deadly pathogen.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered regions are abundant in simplexvirus proteomes and display signatures of positive selection

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Mozzi ◽  
Diego Forni ◽  
Rachele Cagliani ◽  
Mario Clerici ◽  
Uberto Pozzoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Selection ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
New Host ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Human Proteins ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 2 ◽  
Disordered Regions

Abstract Whereas the majority of herpesviruses co-speciated with their mammalian hosts, human herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2, genus Simplexvirus) most likely originated from the cross-species transmission of chimpanzee herpesvirus 1 to an ancestor of modern humans. We exploited the peculiar evolutionary history of HSV-2 to investigate the selective events that drove herpesvirus adaptation to a new host. We show that HSV-2 intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs)—that is, protein domains that do not adopt compact three-dimensional structures—are strongly enriched in positive selection signals. Analysis of viral proteomes indicated that a significantly higher portion of simplexvirus proteins is disordered compared with the proteins of other human herpesviruses. IDR abundance in simplexvirus proteomes was not a consequence of the base composition of their genomes (high G + C content). Conversely, protein function determines the IDR fraction, which is significantly higher in viral proteins that interact with human factors. We also found that the average extent of disorder in herpesvirus proteins tends to parallel that of their human interactors. These data suggest that viruses that interact with fast-evolving, disordered human proteins, in turn, evolve disordered viral interactors poised for innovation. We propose that the high IDR fraction present in simplexvirus proteomes contributes to their wider host range compared with other herpesviruses.

scholarly journals Structural propensity database of proteins

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Tamiola ◽  
Matthew M Heberling ◽  
Jan Domanski
Keyword(s):  
Structural Dynamics ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Chemical Shifts ◽  
Protein Disorder ◽  
Computational Biophysics ◽  
Intrinsic Protein ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Intrinsic Protein Disorder ◽  
Structural Insights

AbstractAn overwhelming amount of experimental evidence suggests that elucidations of protein function, interactions, and pathology are incomplete without inclusion of intrinsic protein disorder and structural dynamics. Thus, to expand our understanding of intrinsic protein disorder, we have created a database of secondary structure (SS) propensities for proteins (dSPP) as a reference resource for experimental research and computational biophysics. The dSPP comprises SS propensities of 7,094 unrelated proteins, as gauged from NMR chemical shift measurements in solution and solid state. Here, we explain the concept of SS propensity and analyze dSPP entries of therapeutic relevance, α-synuclein, MOAG-4, and the ZIKA NS2B-NS3 complex to show: (1) how propensity mapping generates novel structural insights into intrinsically disordered regions of pathologically relevant proteins, (2) how computational biophysics tools can benefit from propensity mapping, and (3) how the residual disorder estimation based on NMR chemical shifts compares with sequence-based disorder predictors. This work demonstrates the benefit of propensity estimation as a method that reports both on protein structure, lability, and disorder.

scholarly journals Intrinsic disorder codes for leaps of protein expression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Ning Chuang ◽  
Tai-Ting Woo ◽  
Shih-Ying Tsai ◽  
Wan-Chen Li ◽  
Chia-Ling Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Protein Folding ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Protein Homeostasis ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Regulate Protein

AbstractIntrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are protein sequences lacking fixed or ordered three-dimensional structures. Many IDRs are endowed with important molecular functions such as physical interactions, posttranslational modifications or solubility enhancement. We reveal that several biologically important IDRs can act as N-terminal fusion carriers to promote target protein folding or protein quality control, thereby enhancing protein expression. This nanny function has a reasonably strong correlation with high S/T/Q/N amino acid content in IDRs and it is tunable (e.g., via phosphorylation) to regulate protein homeostasis. We propose a hypothesis that “N-terminal intrinsic disorder facilitates abundance” (NIDFA) to explain how some yeast proteins use their N-terminal IDRs (N-IDRs) to generate high levels of protein product. These N-IDRs are versatile toolkits for functional divergence in signaling and evolution.SignificanceDisorder within an otherwise well-structured protein is mostly found in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). IDRs can provide many advantages to proteins, including: (1) mediating protein-protein or protein-peptide interactions by adopting different conformations; (2) facilitating protein regulation via diverse posttranslational modifications; and (3) regulating the half-lives of proteins that have been targeted for proteasomal degradation. Here, we report that several biologically important IDRs in S. cerevisiae can act as N-terminal fusion carriers to promote target protein folding or protein quality control, thereby enhancing protein expression. We demonstrate by genetic and bioinformatic analyses that this nanny function is well correlated with high content of serine, threonine, glutamine and asparagine in IDRs and is tunable (e.g., via phosphorylation) to regulate protein homeostasis.

scholarly journals Why do eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Basile ◽  
Marco Salvatore ◽  
Claudio Bassot ◽  
Arne Elofsson
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eukaryotic Proteins ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractIntrinsic disorder is much more abundant in eukaryotic than in prokaryotic proteins. However, the reason behind this is unclear. It has been proposed that the disordered regions are functionally important for regulation in eukaryotes, but it has also been proposed that the difference is a result of lower selective pressure in eukaryotes. Almost all studies intrinsic disorder is predicted from the amino acid sequence of a protein. Therefore, there should exist an underlying difference in the amino acid distributions between eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins causing the predicted difference in intrinsic disorder. To obtain a better understanding of why eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions we compare proteins from complete eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes.Here, we show that the difference in intrinsic disorder origin from differences in the linker regions. Eukaryotic proteins have more extended linker regions and, in particular, the eukaryotic linker regions are more disordered. The average eukaryotic protein is about 500 residues long; it contains 250 residues in linker regions, of which 80 are disordered. In comparison, prokaryotic proteins are about 350 residues long and only have 100-110 residues in linker regions, and less than 10 of these are intrinsically disordered.Further, we show that there is no systematic increase in the frequency of disorder-promoting residues in eukaryotic linker regions. Instead, the difference in frequency of only three amino acids seems to lie behind the difference. The most significant difference is that eukaryotic linkers contain about 9% serine, while prokaryotic linkers have roughly 6.5%. Eukaryotic linkers also contain about 2% more proline and 2-3% fewer isoleucine residues. The reason why primarily these amino acids vary in frequency is not apparent, but it cannot be excluded that the difference is serine is related to the increased need for regulation through phosphorylation and that the proline difference is related to increase of eukaryotic specific repeats.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Sequence Features from Intrinsically Disordered Regions for the Estimation of Protein Function

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e89890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Sharma ◽  
Abdollah Dehzangi ◽  
James Lyons ◽  
Seiya Imoto ◽  
Satoru Miyano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Sequence Features ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

scholarly journals The contribution of intrinsically disordered regions to protein function, cellular complexity, and human disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1185-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Madan Babu
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Human Disease ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Sequence Structure ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Functional Versatility ◽  
Disordered Regions

In the 1960s, Christian Anfinsen postulated that the unique three-dimensional structure of a protein is determined by its amino acid sequence. This work laid the foundation for the sequence–structure–function paradigm, which states that the sequence of a protein determines its structure, and structure determines function. However, a class of polypeptide segments called intrinsically disordered regions does not conform to this postulate. In this review, I will first describe established and emerging ideas about how disordered regions contribute to protein function. I will then discuss molecular principles by which regulatory mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and asymmetric localization of transcripts that encode disordered regions, can increase the functional versatility of proteins. Finally, I will discuss how disordered regions contribute to human disease and the emergence of cellular complexity during organismal evolution.

scholarly journals Role of “dual-personality” fragments in HEV adaptation—analysis of Y-domain region

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoya Shafat ◽  
Anwar Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad K. Parvez ◽  
Shama Parveen
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Recognition ◽  
Functional Annotation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Hepatitis E ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Disordered Regions

Abstract Background Hepatitis E is a liver disease caused by the pathogen hepatitis E virus (HEV). The largest polyprotein open reading frame 1 (ORF1) contains a nonstructural Y-domain region (YDR) whose activity in HEV adaptation remains uncharted. The specific role of disordered regions in several nonstructural proteins has been demonstrated to participate in the multiplication and multiple regulatory functions of the viruses. Thus, intrinsic disorder of YDR including its structural and functional annotation was comprehensively studied by exploiting computational methodologies to delineate its role in viral adaptation. Results Based on our findings, it was evident that YDR contains significantly higher levels of ordered regions with less prevalence of disordered residues. Sequence-based analysis of YDR revealed it as a “dual personality” (DP) protein due to the presence of both structured and unstructured (intrinsically disordered) regions. The evolution of YDR was shaped by pressures that lead towards predominance of both disordered and regularly folded amino acids (Ala, Arg, Gly, Ile, Leu, Phe, Pro, Ser, Tyr, Val). Additionally, the predominance of characteristic DP residues (Thr, Arg, Gly, and Pro) further showed the order as well as disorder characteristic possessed by YDR. The intrinsic disorder propensity analysis of YDR revealed it as a moderately disordered protein. All the YDR sequences consisted of molecular recognition features (MoRFs), i.e., intrinsic disorder-based protein–protein interaction (PPI) sites, in addition to several nucleotide-binding sites. Thus, the presence of molecular recognition (PPI, RNA binding, and DNA binding) signifies the YDR’s interaction with specific partners, host membranes leading to further viral infection. The presence of various disordered-based phosphorylation sites further signifies the role of YDR in various biological processes. Furthermore, functional annotation of YDR revealed it as a multifunctional-associated protein, due to its susceptibility in binding to a wide range of ligands and involvement in various catalytic activities. Conclusions As DP are targets for regulation, thus, YDR contributes to cellular signaling processes through PPIs. As YDR is incompletely understood, therefore, our data on disorder-based function could help in better understanding its associated functions. Collectively, our novel data from this comprehensive investigation is the first attempt to delineate YDR role in the regulation and pathogenesis of HEV.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document