scholarly journals In vitro transcription accurately predicts lac repressor phenotype in vivo in Escherichia coli

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Sochor
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Lac Repressor ◽  
Molecular Crowding ◽  
Binding Data ◽  
Direct Modeling ◽  
Operator Dna ◽  
The Given

A multitude of studies have looked at the in vivo and in vitro behavior of the lac repressor binding to DNA and effector molecules in order to study transcriptional repression, however these studies are not always reconcilable. Here we use in vitro transcription to directly mimic the in vivo system in order to build a self consistent set of experiments to directly compare in vivo and in vitro genetic repression. A thermodynamic model of the lac repressor binding to operator DNA and effector is used to link DNA occupancy to either normalized in vitro mRNA product or normalized in vivo fluorescence of a regulated gene, YFP. An accurate measurement of repressor, DNA and effector concentrations were made both in vivo and in vitro allowing for direct modeling of the entire thermodynamic equilibrium. In vivo repression profiles are accurately predicted from the given in vitro parameters when molecular crowding is considered. Interestingly, our measured repressor-operator DNA affinity differs significantly from previous in vitro measurements. The literature values are unable to replicate in vivo binding data. We therefore conclude that the repressor-DNA affinity is much weaker than previously thought. This finding would suggest that in vitro techniques that are specifically designed to mimic the in vivo process may be necessary to replicate the native system.

scholarly journals In vitro transcription accurately predicts lac repressor phenotype in vivo in Escherichia coli

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Sochor
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Lac Repressor ◽  
Molecular Crowding ◽  
Binding Data ◽  
Direct Modeling ◽  
Operator Dna ◽  
The Given

A multitude of studies have looked at the in vivo and in vitro behavior of the lac repressor binding to DNA and effector molecules in order to study transcriptional repression, however these studies are not always reconcilable. Here we use in vitro transcription to directly mimic the in vivo system in order to build a self consistent set of experiments to directly compare in vivo and in vitro genetic repression. A thermodynamic model of the lac repressor binding to operator DNA and effector is used to link DNA occupancy to either normalized in vitro mRNA product or normalized in vivo fluorescence of a regulated gene, YFP. An accurate measurement of repressor, DNA and effector concentrations were made both in vivo and in vitro allowing for direct modeling of the entire thermodynamic equilibrium. In vivo repression profiles are accurately predicted from the given in vitro parameters when molecular crowding is considered. Interestingly, our measured repressor-operator DNA affinity differs significantly from previous in vitro measurements. The literature values are unable to replicate in vivo binding data. We therefore conclude that the repressor-DNA affinity is much weaker than previously thought. This finding would suggest that in vitro techniques that are specifically designed to mimic the in vivo process may be necessary to replicate the native system.

scholarly journals Insights into Transcriptional Repression of the Homologous Toxin-Antitoxin Cassettes yefM-yoeB and axe-txe

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 9062
Author(s):  
Barbara Kędzierska ◽  
Katarzyna Potrykus ◽  
Agnieszka Szalewska-Pałasz ◽  
Beata Wodzikowska
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
High Sequence Similarity ◽  
Sequence Composition ◽  
Repressor Complex ◽  
Transcriptional Fusions

Transcriptional repression is a mechanism which enables effective gene expression switch off. The activity of most of type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) cassettes is controlled in this way. These cassettes undergo negative autoregulation by the TA protein complex which binds to the promoter/operator sequence and blocks transcription initiation of the TA operon. Precise and tight control of this process is vital to avoid uncontrolled expression of the toxin component. Here, we employed a series of in vivo and in vitro experiments to establish the molecular basis for previously observed differences in transcriptional activity and repression levels of the pyy and pat promoters which control expression of two homologous TA systems, YefM-YoeB and Axe-Txe, respectively. Transcriptional fusions of promoters with a lux reporter, together with in vitro transcription, EMSA and footprinting assays revealed that: (1) the different sequence composition of the −35 promoter element is responsible for substantial divergence in strengths of the promoters; (2) variations in repression result from the TA repressor complex acting at different steps in the transcription initiation process; (3) transcription from an additional promoter upstream of pat also contributes to the observed inefficient repression of axe-txe module. This study provides evidence that even closely related TA cassettes with high sequence similarity in the promoter/operator region may employ diverse mechanisms for transcriptional regulation of their genes.

Sequence requirements for premature transcription arrest within the first intron of the mouse c-fos gene

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2832-2841
Author(s):  
N Mechti ◽  
M Piechaczyk ◽  
J M Blanchard ◽  
P Jeanteur ◽  
B Lebleu
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
First Intron ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Intron 1 ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Sequence Requirements

A strong block to the elongation of nascent RNA transcripts by RNA polymerase II occurs in the 5' part of the mammalian c-fos proto-oncogene. In addition to the control of initiation, this mechanism contributes to transcriptional regulation of the gene. In vitro transcription experiments using nuclear extracts and purified transcription templates allowed us to map a unique arrest site within the mouse first intron 385 nucleotides downstream from the promoter. This position is in keeping with that estimated from nuclear run-on assays performed with short DNA probes and thus suggests that it corresponds to the actual block in vivo. Moreover, we have shown that neither the c-fos promoter nor upstream sequences are absolute requirements for an efficient transcription arrest both in vivo and in vitro. Finally, we have characterized a 103-nucleotide-long intron 1 motif comprising the arrest site and sufficient for obtaining the block in a cell-free transcription assay.

Myosin light-chain 1 and 3 gene has two structurally distinct and differentially regulated promoters evolving at different rates

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3168-3182
Author(s):  
E E Strehler ◽  
M Periasamy ◽  
M A Strehler-Page ◽  
B Nadal-Ginard
Keyword(s):  
Light Chain ◽  
Myosin Light Chain ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Chain Gene ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Light Chain Gene ◽  
Direct Initiation

DNA fragments located 10 kilobases apart in the genome and containing, respectively, the first myosin light chain 1 (MLC1f) and the first myosin light chain 3 (MLC3f) specific exon of the rat myosin light chain 1 and 3 gene, together with several hundred base pairs of upstream flanking sequences, have been shown in runoff in vitro transcription assays to direct initiation of transcription at the cap sites of MLC1f and MLC3f mRNAs used in vivo. These results establish the presence of two separate, functional promoters within that gene. A comparison of the nucleotide sequence of the rat MLC1f/3f gene with the corresponding sequences from mouse and chicken shows that: the MLC1f promoter regions have been highly conserved up to position -150 from the cap site while the MLC3f promoter regions display a very poor degree of homology and even the absence or poor conservation of typical eucaryotic promoter elements such as TATA and CAT boxes; the exon/intron structure of this gene has been completely conserved in the three species; and corresponding exons, except for the regions encoding most of the 5' and 3' untranslated sequences, show greater than 75% homology while corresponding introns are similar in size but considerably divergent in sequence. The above findings indicate that the overall structure of the MLC1f/3f genes has been maintained between avian and mammalian species and that these genes contain two functional and widely spaced promoters. The fact that the structures of the alkali light chain gene from Drosophila melanogaster and of other related genes of the troponin C supergene family resemble a MLC3f gene without an upstream promoter and first exon strongly suggests that the present-day MLC1f/3f genes of higher vertebrates arose from a primordial alkali light chain gene through the addition of a far-upstream MLC1f-specific promoter and first exon. The two promoters have evolved at different rates, with the MLC1f promoter being more conserved than the MLC3f promoter. This discrepant evolutionary rate might reflect different mechanisms of promoter activation for the transcription of MLC1f and MLC3f RNA.

Accurate transcription of a plant mitochondrial gene in vitro

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2035-2039
Author(s):  
P J Hanic-Joyce ◽  
M W Gray
Keyword(s):  
Mitochondrial Gene ◽  
Plant Mitochondria ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Dna Templates ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Translation Initiation Codon ◽  
Mitochondrial Extract

To investigate transcriptional mechanisms in plant mitochondria, we have developed an accurate and efficient in vitro transcription system consisting of a partially purified wheat mitochondrial extract programmed with cloned DNA templates containing the promoter for the wheat mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene (coxII). Using this system, we localize the coxII promoter to a 372-bp region spanning positions -56 to -427 relative to the coxII translation initiation codon. We show that in vitro transcription of coxII is initiated at position -170, precisely the same site at which transcription is initiated in vivo. Transcription begins within the sequence GTATAGTAAGTA (the initiating nucleotide is underlined), which is similar to the consensus yeast mitochondrial promoter motif, (A/T)TATAAGTA. This is the first in vitro system that faithfully reproduces in vivo transcription of a plant mitochondrial gene.

Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1266-1275
Author(s):  
W Q Xie ◽  
L I Rothblum
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Repeat Distance ◽  
Deletion Mutations ◽  
The Core ◽  
In Vivo Experiments

Efficient transcription from the rat rDNA promoter results from an undefined interaction between the core (CPE) and upstream (UPE) promoter elements or the protein complexes which form on them. These interactions were demonstrated by the behavior of promoters that contained either linker-scanning or deletion mutations of the UPE in combination with point mutations of the CPE (bidomain mutants). In vivo transcription experiments using point mutations within the CPE (G----A mutation at either -16 or -7) demonstrated that the CPE may in fact consist of two domains. Whereas both of these mutants were rescued by the addition of UBF to in vitro transcription reactions, the CPE mutant -7A/G was inactive in vivo. Experiments with these bidomain mutants demonstrated that the UPE was required for the rescue of the CPE mutants. We also examined the hypothesis that this interaction might require a stereospecific alignment of the promoter elements. Our results indicate that the promoter consists of several domains with differing responses to mutations that alter the distance between, or within, the promoter elements. For example, the insertion or deletion of half-multiples of the helical repeat distance between -167 and -147 had no significant effect on transcription. On the other hand, some sites were sensitive to deletions of any size but not to insertions of up to 20 bp. The analyses of two sites yielded results suggesting that they lay between domains of the promoter that must be on the same side of the DNA helix for promoter activity. The first of these sites mapped between -106 and -95.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document