scholarly journals The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Graystock ◽  
Dave Goulson ◽  
William O Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Parasite Prevalence ◽  
Wild Bees ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Nosema Bombi ◽  
Crithidia Bombi ◽  
Parasite Spillover ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Honey bees and, more recently, bumblebees have been domesticated and are now managed commercially primarily for crop pollination, mixing with wild pollinators during foraging on shared flower resources. There is mounting evidence that managed honey bees or commercially produced bumblebees may affect the health of wild pollinators such as bumblebees by increasing competition for resources and the prevalence of parasites in wild bees. Here we screened 764 bumblebees from around five greenhouses that either used commercially produced bumblebees or did not, as well as bumblebees from 10 colonies placed at two sites either close to or far from a honey bee apiary, for the parasites Apicystis bombi, Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, N. apis and deformed wing virus. We found that A. bombi and C. bombi were more prevalent around greenhouses using commercially produced bumblebees, while C. bombi was 18% more prevalent in bumblebees at the site near to the honey bee apiary than those at the site far from the apiary. Whilst these results are from only a limited number of sites, they support previous reports of parasite spillover from commercially produced bumblebees to wild bumblebees, and suggest that the impact of stress from competing with managed bees or the vectoring of parasites by them on parasite prevalence in wild bees needs further investigation. It appears increasingly likely that the use of managed bees comes at a cost of increased parasites in wild bumblebees, which is not only a concern for bumblebee conservation, but which may impact other pollinators as well.

scholarly journals The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Graystock ◽  
Dave Goulson ◽  
William O Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Parasite Prevalence ◽  
Wild Bees ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Nosema Bombi ◽  
Crithidia Bombi ◽  
Parasite Spillover ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Honey bees and, more recently, bumblebees have been domesticated and are now managed commercially primarily for crop pollination, mixing with wild pollinators during foraging on shared flower resources. There is mounting evidence that managed honey bees or commercially produced bumblebees may affect the health of wild pollinators such as bumblebees by increasing competition for resources and the prevalence of parasites in wild bees. Here we screened 764 bumblebees from around five greenhouses that either used commercially produced bumblebees or did not, as well as bumblebees from 10 colonies placed at two sites either close to or far from a honey bee apiary, for the parasites Apicystis bombi, Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, N. apis and deformed wing virus. We found that A. bombi and C. bombi were more prevalent around greenhouses using commercially produced bumblebees, while C. bombi was 18% more prevalent in bumblebees at the site near to the honey bee apiary than those at the site far from the apiary. Whilst these results are from only a limited number of sites, they support previous reports of parasite spillover from commercially produced bumblebees to wild bumblebees, and suggest that the impact of stress from competing with managed bees or the vectoring of parasites by them on parasite prevalence in wild bees needs further investigation. It appears increasingly likely that the use of managed bees comes at a cost of increased parasites in wild bumblebees, which is not only a concern for bumblebee conservation, but which may impact other pollinators as well.

scholarly journals The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Graystock ◽  
Dave Goulson ◽  
William O Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Parasite Prevalence ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Nosema Bombi ◽  
Crithidia Bombi ◽  
Parasite Spillover ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Pollinator Populations

Honey bees have been domesticated for centuries, and are now managed commercially to pollinate crops and produce hive products. Recently, bumblebee colonies have also been reared commercially and transported worldwide for crop pollination.Mounting evidence suggests that use of managed honey bees or commercially reared bumblebees may affect the health of local bumblebees. The increase in pollinator density and the mixing of managed and wild pollinator populations may augment parasite prevalence in wild bumblebees. Here, we screened 764bumblebees from around five greenhouses that either used commercially reared bumblebees or did not, as well as bumblebees from 10 colonies placed at two sites either close to or far from a honey bee apiary, for the parasites Apicystis bombi, Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, N. apis and deformed wing virus. We found that two of the parasites were more prevalent in bumblebees that were close to managed honey bees or commercially reared bumblebees. Apicystis bombi and C. bombi were more prevalent around greenhouses using commercially reared bumblebees, while bumblebees from near to the honey bee apiary had an 18% greater prevalence of C. bombi compared to bumblebees far from the apiary. Whilst these results support previous reports of parasite spillover from commercial bumblebees, they also suggest that the prevalence of C. bombi may be elevated by stress or increased pollinator density, in addition potentially to direct spillover from commercial bumblebees. The use of managed bees clearly comes at a cost of increased parasites in wild bumblebees, which is not only a concern for bumblebee conservation, but also a phenomenon that is likely found in other sympatric pollinators around managed bees.

scholarly journals Transcriptome-level assessment of the impact of deformed wing virus on honey bee larvae

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zih-Ting Chang ◽  
Yu-Feng Huang ◽  
Yue-Wen Chen ◽  
Ming-Ren Yen ◽  
Po-Ya Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Honey Bee ◽  
Larval Stage ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Pupal Stage ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Honey Bee Larvae ◽  
Gene Expression Levels

AbstractDeformed wing virus (DWV) prevalence is high in honey bee (Apis mellifera) populations. The virus infects honey bees through vertical and horizontal transmission, leading to behavioural changes, wing deformity, and early mortality. To better understand the impacts of viral infection in the larval stage of honey bees, artificially reared honey bee larvae were infected with DWV (1.55 × 1010 copies/per larva). No significant mortality occurred in infected honey bee larvae, while the survival rates decreased significantly at the pupal stage. Examination of DWV replication revealed that viral replication began at 2 days post inoculation (d.p.i.), increased dramatically to 4 d.p.i., and then continuously increased in the pupal stage. To better understand the impact of DWV on the larval stage, DWV-infected and control groups were subjected to transcriptomic analysis at 4 d.p.i. Two hundred fifty-five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ -2) were identified. Of these DEGs, 168 genes were downregulated, and 87 genes were upregulated. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that 141 DEGs (55.3%) were categorized into molecular functions, cellular components and biological processes. One hundred eleven genes (38 upregulated and 73 downregulated) were annotated by KO (KEGG Orthology) pathway mapping and involved metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and glycine, serine and threonine metabolism pathways. Validation of DEGs was performed, and the related gene expression levels showed a similar tendency to the DEG predictions at 4 d.p.i.; cell wall integrity and stress response component 1 (wsc1), cuticular protein and myo-inositol 2-dehydrogenase (iolG) were significantly upregulated, and small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel protein (SK) was significantly downregulated at 4 d.p.i. Related gene expression levels at different d.p.i. revealed that these DEGs were significantly regulated from the larval stage to the pupal stage, indicating the potential impacts of gene expression levels from the larval to the pupal stages. Taken together, DWV infection in the honey bee larval stage potentially influences the gene expression levels from larvae to pupae and reduces the survival rate of the pupal stage. This information emphasizes the consequences of DWV prevalence in honey bee larvae for apiculture.

scholarly journals Genetic diversity, parasite prevalence and immunity in wild bumblebees

2010 ◽  
Vol 278 (1709) ◽  
pp. 1195-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope R. Whitehorn ◽  
Matthew C. Tinsley ◽  
Mark J. F. Brown ◽  
Ben Darvill ◽  
Dave Goulson
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Parasite Prevalence ◽  
Isolated Populations ◽  
Parasite Abundance ◽  
Island Populations ◽  
Crithidia Bombi ◽  
Insect Populations ◽  
Loss Of Genetic Diversity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Inbreeding and a consequent loss of genetic diversity threaten small, isolated populations. One mechanism by which genetically impoverished populations may become extinct is through decreased immunocompetence and higher susceptibility to parasites. Here, we investigate the relationship between immunity and inbreeding in bumblebees, using Hebridean island populations of Bombus muscorum . We sampled nine populations and recorded parasite prevalence and measured two aspects of immunity: the encapsulation response and levels of phenoloxidase (PO). We found that prevalence of the gut parasite Crithidia bombi was higher in populations with lower genetic diversity. Neither measure of immune activity was correlated with genetic diversity. However, levels of PO declined with age and were also negatively correlated with parasite abundance. Our results suggest that as insect populations lose heterozygosity, the impact of parasitism will increase, pushing threatened populations closer to extinction.

scholarly journals Nationwide Screening for Important Bee Viruses in Belgian Honey Bees

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Severine Matthijs ◽  
Nick De Regge
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Ct Value ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Bee Colonies ◽  
Paralysis Virus

The ecological and economic importance of bees for pollination and biodiversity is well established. The health of bees is, however, threatened by a multitude of factors, including viruses. In this study, we screened 557 colonies from 155 beekeepers distributed all over Belgium to monitor the prevalence and distribution of seven widespread viruses in Belgian honey bees (Apis mellifera). Several of these viruses have been linked with an increased risk for colony loss. Although these viruses can severely impact honey bees and can even cause the death of larvae or adults, colonies with a low viral load usually appear asymptomatic (covert infection). The presence of viruses was determined by real-time RT-PCR. The three most prevalent viruses in Belgian honey bees are Deformed wing virus B (DWV-B or VDV-1), Black queen cell virus (BQCV), and Sacbrood virus (SBV). These viruses were found in more than 90% of the honey bee colonies, but often with a high Ct value, which indicates that they are present at low viral loads (less than 3 log10 genome copies per bee). In certain colonies, however, DWV-B, BQCV, or SBV was detected with a low Ct value, representing a high viral load (in some cases, more than 7 log10 genome copies per bee) and with an increased likelihood of development of clinical symptoms. Deformed wing virus A (DWV-A), Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), and Chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) were found in less than 40% of the colonies. Kashmir bee virus (KBV) was not found in any of the analyzed Belgian honey bees. Most of the honey bee colonies are infected with multiple viruses, albeit with low virus loads. The impact of viruses can however become critical in the presence of other detrimental factors such as parasites (Nosema sp., Varroa sp.) and pesticides.

scholarly journals Possible Spillover of Pathogens between Bee Communities Foraging on the Same Floral Resource

Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Anne Dalmon ◽  
Virgine Diévart ◽  
Maxime Thomasson ◽  
Romain Fouque ◽  
Bernard E. Vaissière ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
Wild Bees ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Wild Bee ◽  
Pollinator Community ◽  
Floral Resource ◽  
Paralysis Virus

Viruses are known to contribute to bee population decline. Possible spillover is suspected from the co-occurrence of viruses in wild bees and honey bees. In order to study the risk of virus transmission between wild and managed bee species sharing the same floral resource, we tried to maximize the possible cross-infections using Phacelia tanacetifolia, which is highly attractive to honey bees and a broad range of wild bee species. Virus prevalence was compared over two years in Southern France. A total of 1137 wild bees from 29 wild bee species (based on COI barcoding) and 920 honey bees (Apis mellifera) were checked for the seven most common honey bee RNA viruses. Halictid bees were the most abundant. Co-infections were frequent, and Sacbrood virus (SBV), Black queen cell virus (BQCV), Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV) were widespread in the hymenopteran pollinator community. Conversely, Deformed wing virus (DWV) was detected at low levels in wild bees, whereas it was highly prevalent in honey bees (78.3% of the samples). Both wild bee and honey bee virus isolates were sequenced to look for possible host-specificity or geographical structuring. ABPV phylogeny suggested a specific cluster for Eucera bees, while isolates of DWV from bumble bees (Bombus spp.) clustered together with honey bee isolates, suggesting a possible spillover.

scholarly journals A56 Visualization of recombination in deformed wing virus infecting bees

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Bigot ◽  
Andreas Gogol-Döring ◽  
Peter Koch ◽  
Robert J Paxton
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bees ◽  
Bumble Bees ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Data ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Wild Bees ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Detection And Quantification

Abstract Honey bees suffer increasing colony mortality worldwide, partially caused by the spread of viral pathogens. Among these pathogens, deformed wing virus (DWV) is one of the major, widespread viruses of honey bees resulting in wing deformities and weakening colonies. DWV can be found in honey bees, bumble bees, and other wild bees as three major genotypes named DWV-A, -B (also named Varroa destructor virus 1), and -C. Various recombinants of DWV-A and -B have been previously found in honey bees, some of which have been suggested to have higher virulence over non-recombinant, parental virus. In most of these cases, recombinants were only shown as consensus sequences from previous assemblies and alignments and may not reflect the biological reality of all variants present within a host bee. It is therefore important to build a method of recombinant detection and quantification within mixed infections in single-host individuals, including both parental and various recombinant genomes, so as to evaluate the relevance of recombinants for viral genome evolution and the impact on hosts. Here, we propose to visualize and quantify these recombinants using next-generation sequencing data to better understand how these genomes evolve within bees. Our method will be performed directly from raw sequence reads from various datasets (including field and lab experiments as well as screening of public databases) in order to obtain an overview of DWV recombination in various in vivo and in vitro conditions. Recombination of viral genomes is a key point for virus evolution. The detection and quantification of recombination will facilitate analysis of the determinants of recombination and help in understanding the routes by which new viral variants emerge. The emergence of new (more virulent) recombinant viruses can result from acquisition of new capabilities, such as escape from host immunity or increased transmission rates. Recombination can also lead to adaptation to new environments and new hosts by a change in cell tropism, allowing cross-species transmission, which may be particularly relevant for bumble bees and wild bees infected by honey bee-derived DWV.

scholarly journals Impact of Chronic Exposure to Sublethal Doses of Glyphosate on Honey Bee Immunity, Gut Microbiota and Infection by Pathogens

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 845
Author(s):  
Loreley Castelli ◽  
Sofía Balbuena ◽  
Belén Branchiccela ◽  
Pablo Zunino ◽  
Joanito Liberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Honey Bee ◽  
Chronic Exposure ◽  
Pollination Services ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Immune Genes ◽  
Bee Health ◽  
Honey Bee Health ◽  
Sublethal Doses ◽  
The Impact

Glyphosate is the most used pesticide around the world. Although different studies have evidenced its negative effect on honey bees, including detrimental impacts on behavior, cognitive, sensory and developmental abilities, its use continues to grow. Recent studies have shown that it also alters the composition of the honey bee gut microbiota. In this study we explored the impact of chronic exposure to sublethal doses of glyphosate on the honey bee gut microbiota and its effects on the immune response, infection by Nosema ceranae and Deformed wing virus (DWV) and honey bee survival. Glyphosate combined with N. ceranae infection altered the structure and composition of the honey bee gut microbiota, for example by decreasing the relative abundance of the core members Snodgrassella alvi and Lactobacillus apis. Glyphosate increased the expression of some immune genes, possibly representing a physiological response to mitigate its negative effects. However, this response was not sufficient to maintain honey bee health, as glyphosate promoted the replication of DWV and decreased the expression of vitellogenin, which were accompanied by a reduced life span. Infection by N. ceranae also alters honey bee immunity although no synergistic effect with glyphosate was observed. These results corroborate previous findings suggesting deleterious effects of widespread use of glyphosate on honey bee health, and they contribute to elucidate the physiological mechanisms underlying a global decline of pollination services.

scholarly journals Deformed wing virus variant shift from 2010 to 2016 in managed and feral UK honey bee colonies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Kevill ◽  
K. C. Stainton ◽  
D. C. Schroeder ◽  
S. J. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Small Study ◽  
Deformed Wing Virus ◽  
Virus Variant ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Bee Colonies ◽  
Existing Data

AbstractDeformed wing virus (DWV) has been linked to the global decline of honey bees. DWV exists as three master variants (DWV-A, DWV-B, and DWV-C), each with differing outcomes for the honey bee host. Research in the USA showed a shift from DWV-A to DWV-B between 2010 to 2016 in honey bee colonies. Likewise, in the UK, a small study in 2007 found only DWV-A, whereas in 2016, DWV-B was the most prevalent variant. This suggests a shift from DWV-A to DWV-B might have occurred in the UK between 2007 and 2016. To investigate this further, data from samples collected in 2009/10 (n = 46) were compared to existing data from 2016 (n = 42). These samples also allowed a comparison of DWV variants between Varroa-untreated (feral) and Varroa-treated (managed) colonies. The results revealed that, in the UK, DWV-A was far more prevalent in 2009/10 (87%) than in 2016 (43%). In contrast, DWV-B was less prevalent in 2009/10 (76%) than in 2016 (93%). Regardless if colonies had been treated for Varroa (managed) or not (feral), the same trend from DWV-A to DWV-B occurred. Overall, the results reveal a decrease in DWV-A and an increase in DWV-B in UK colonies.

scholarly journals Toxicity Evaluation of Selected Plant Water Extracts on a Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Larvae Model

Animals ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Roksana Kruszakin ◽  
Paweł Migdal
Keyword(s):  
Apis Mellifera ◽  
Honey Bee ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Larval Rearing ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Chelidonium Majus ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Study Laboratory ◽  
The Impact

So far, larval rearing in vitro has been an important method in the assessment of bee toxicology, particularly in pesticide risk assessment. However, natural products are increasingly used to control honey bee pathogens or to enhance bee immunity, but their effects on honey bee larvae are mostly unknown. In this study, laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effects of including selected aqueous plant infusions in the diet of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) larvae in vitro. The toxicity of infusions from three different plant species considered to be medicinal plants was evaluated: tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.), greater celandine (Chelidonium majus L.), and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). The impact of each on the survival of the larvae of honey bees was also evaluated. One-day-old larvae were fed a basal diet consisting of distilled water, sugars (glucose and fructose), yeast extract, and freeze-dried royal jelly or test diets in which distilled water was replaced by plant infusions. The proportion of the diet components was adjusted to the age of the larvae. The larvae were fed twice a day. The experiment lasted seven days. Significant statistical differences in survival rates were found between groups of larvae (exposed or not to the infusions of tansy, greater celandine, and coriander). A significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the survival rate was observed in the group with the addition of a coriander herb infusion compared to the control. These results indicate that plant extracts intended to be used in beekeeping should be tested on all development stages of honey bees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document