scholarly journals Operationalizing Central Place Theory and Central Flow Theory with mobile phone data

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Doran ◽  
Andrew Fox
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Flow Theory ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Mobile Phone Data ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
Cooperative Development ◽  
Socioeconomic Data ◽  
Central Flow

Central Place and Central Flow Theory are geographic principles explaining why and how cities develop across large regional spaces. Central Place Theory postulates that cities self-organize into a spatial hierarchy were small numbers of very large ‘Central Places’ support numerous surrounding and less developed ‘Low Places’, while ‘Middle Places’ develop at the periphery of where Central Places carry spatial influence. Central Flow Theory is a comple- mentary notion that explains the cooperative development of cities through joint information sharing. Both theories are often discussed, with multiple regional development and economic models built upon their tenents. However, it is very difficult to quantify the degree to which Central Place and Central Flow Theory explains the development and positions of cities in a region, particularly in developing countries where socioeconomic data is difficult to collect. To facilitate these measurements, this paper presents a way to operationalize Central Place and Central Flow Theory using mobile phone data collected across a region. It defines a set of mobile phone data attributes that are related to basic facets of the two theories, and demonstrates how their measurements speak to the degree to which the theories hold in the region the mobile phone data covers. The theory is then applied in a case study where promising locations for economic investment in a developing nation are identified.

scholarly journals Operationalizing Central Place Theory and Central Flow Theory with mobile phone data

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Doran ◽  
Andrew Fox
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Flow Theory ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Mobile Phone Data ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
Cooperative Development ◽  
Socioeconomic Data ◽  
Central Flow

Central Place and Central Flow Theory are geographic principles explaining why and how cities develop across large regional spaces. Central Place Theory postulates that cities self-organize into a spatial hierarchy were small numbers of very large ‘Central Places’ support numerous surrounding and less developed ‘Low Places’, while ‘Middle Places’ develop at the periphery of where Central Places carry spatial influence. Central Flow Theory is a comple- mentary notion that explains the cooperative development of cities through joint information sharing. Both theories are often discussed, with multiple regional development and economic models built upon their tenents. However, it is very difficult to quantify the degree to which Central Place and Central Flow Theory explains the development and positions of cities in a region, particularly in developing countries where socioeconomic data is difficult to collect. To facilitate these measurements, this paper presents a way to operationalize Central Place and Central Flow Theory using mobile phone data collected across a region. It defines a set of mobile phone data attributes that are related to basic facets of the two theories, and demonstrates how their measurements speak to the degree to which the theories hold in the region the mobile phone data covers. The theory is then applied in a case study where promising locations for economic investment in a developing nation are identified.

scholarly journals External Urban Relational Process: Introducing Central Flow Theory to Complement Central Place Theory

Urban Studies ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 2803-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Taylor ◽  
Michael Hoyler ◽  
Raf Verbruggen
Keyword(s):  
Network Model ◽  
Hierarchical Model ◽  
Flow Theory ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Urban Networks ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
Non Local ◽  
Central Flow ◽  
Relational Process

Central place hierarchies have been the traditional basis for understanding external urban relations. However, in contemporary studies of these relations, a new emphasis on urban networks has emerged. Rather than either abandoning or extending central place thinking, it is here treated as representing one of two generic processes of external urban relations. Town-ness is the making of ‘local’ urban—hinterland relations and ‘city-ness’ is the making of ‘non-local’ interurban relations. Central place theory describes the former through an interlocking hierarchical model; this paper proposes a central flow theory to describe the latter through an interlocking network model. The key difference is the level of complexity in the two processes.

scholarly journals Christaller and “big data”: recalibrating central place theory via the geoweb

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel van Meeteren ◽  
Ate Poorthuis
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Consumption Behavior ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
Urban Economic ◽  
Population Spread ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
History Of

This article utilizes central place theory (CPT) to navigate the “deluge” brought about by big data. While originating in the 1930s, CPT is a theoretical monument of 1960s spatial science. CPT aims to understand settlement geographies based on consumption behavior and is often presented as a singular, outdated, and rationalist theory. After critically reviewing the history of CPT, we assess the microfoundations of Christaller’s CPT – the threshold and range of goods – for various central functions in Louisville, Kentucky. The microfoundations are estimated through data from social media platforms Foursquare and Twitter. These sources alleviate many of the operationalization issues that traditionally hamper empirical use of CPT. The empirical application of CPT reveals that: (i) central functions have typical ranges and thresholds relating central places to population spread; (ii) central functions cluster based on an approximate hierarchical structure. The findings indicate the ongoing importance of CPT in shaping urban-economic geographies.

SOME FACTORS AFFECTING MARITAL DISTANCES IN THE OUTER HEBRIDES

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. CLEGG ◽  
T. J. RINGROSE ◽  
J. F. CROSS
Keyword(s):  
Short Distance ◽  
Random Mating ◽  
Central Place ◽  
The South ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
South West ◽  
Outer Hebrides

Some factors affecting marital distances have been studied in two Outer Hebridean islands, Harris (843 marriages) and Barra (444 marriages), over the period 1855-1990. In each island marital distances fell before 1900, but then rose to their greatest values after the 1950s. Fishermen generally married at the shortest distances and men in land-based occupations at the longest. The depression in the fishing industry during the 1880s and early 1890s was associated with reductions in marital distances, especially among fishermen. In the different regions of Harris, marital distances were least in the south-east, where settlement was most dense, and greatest in the south-west where it was most sparse.When the association between marital frequencies and inter-settlement distances was studied, it was found that for Harris there was, overall, a trend to endogamous and short-distance marriage. However, this trend was only slight during 1955-90. For Barra a similar trend was found before 1955, but thereafter there appeared to be virtually no connection between marital frequency and inter-settlement distance. Thus the only constraint on marriage was the spatial distribution of settlements. In this situation the chances of random mating with respect to distance are maximised.Application of ‘Central Place’ theory suggested that only since 1946 can any tendency be detected to regard Tarbert in Harris or Castlebay in Barra as Central Places, at least as far as marriage is concerned. In each island the tendency appears to be limited to the settlements closest to the Central Place.

Temporal Change in a Central-Place System

1981 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Parr
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Change ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Urban Systems ◽  
Systematic Treatment ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
General Lack ◽  
Central Place System ◽  
Static Approach

A serious deficiency in the development of central-place theory has been the general lack of any systematic treatment of the question of temporal change. This deficiency has undoubtedly impaired the usefulness of central-place theory in the analysis of urban systems. In this paper three broad categories of temporal change in a central-place system are identified. One such category involves changes in the structure of the hierarchy. These consist of the formation of a new level of the hierarchy, the modification in the extent of a level, and the disappearance of a level. Existing central-place models prove inadequate for dealing with changes of this kind, and it becomes necessary to adopt a comparative-static approach which employs less restrictive models. Such an approach inevitably involves a degree of simplification, although it is able to take account of the fact that change takes place against a background of locational inertia, in which the locations of central places are fixed. This comparative-static approach may be helpful in the analysis of actual urban systems and their development through time.

A Note on the Central Place Theory

1973 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Biermann
Keyword(s):  
Central Place ◽  
Value Judgments ◽  
Excess Function ◽  
Central Place Theory ◽  
Central Places ◽  
Spatial Stability ◽  
Place Theory ◽  
Short Survey

Although the pioneering study by Christaller (1933) has produced a flood of publications on central place theory which now extend beyond the limits of a short survey, the fact remains that these publications rest on investigations that are purely static and retrospective. Essentially the publications represent no advance on Christaller's work. They attempt, that is, to describe existing positions and to develop indicators for the identification of central place structures. In doing so these writers adopt, without exception, the concept of “excess function”(1) which was already used by Christaller to characterize central places. [A survey of Christaller's ideas can be found in Berry and Pred (1965); see also Beckmann (1968), von Böventer (1969), Gustafsson and Söker (1972), Biermann (1973a) and elsewhere.] None, however, shows how this excess function came into being, or, alternatively, how it can be explained, and whether it exhibits objective spatial stability(2). It is often overlooked, or uncritically accepted, that numerous value judgments and assumptions on the behaviour of consumers are, in addition, contained in this excess function. In other words, the discussions in these publications have no explanatory character. By the same token they contain, strictly speaking, no empirically-based theories; that is, they lack the ‘explanans' that would make it possible to forecast ensuing occurrences and phenomena (Popper, 1959).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document