The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence: Assessment and Recommendations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Tarraf ◽  
William Shelton ◽  
Edward Parker ◽  
Brien Alkire ◽  
Diana Carew ◽  
...  
Information ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Peter Cihon ◽  
Jonas Schuett ◽  
Seth D. Baum

Corporations play a major role in artificial intelligence (AI) research, development, and deployment, with profound consequences for society. This paper surveys opportunities to improve how corporations govern their AI activities so as to better advance the public interest. The paper focuses on the roles of and opportunities for a wide range of actors inside the corporation—managers, workers, and investors—and outside the corporation—corporate partners and competitors, industry consortia, nonprofit organizations, the public, the media, and governments. Whereas prior work on multistakeholder AI governance has proposed dedicated institutions to bring together diverse actors and stakeholders, this paper explores the opportunities they have even in the absence of dedicated multistakeholder institutions. The paper illustrates these opportunities with many cases, including the participation of Google in the U.S. Department of Defense Project Maven; the publication of potentially harmful AI research by OpenAI, with input from the Partnership on AI; and the sale of facial recognition technology to law enforcement by corporations including Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft. These and other cases demonstrate the wide range of mechanisms to advance AI corporate governance in the public interest, especially when diverse actors work together.


Subject US exploration of artificial intelligence-enabled defence systems. Significance The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technological systems that can learn and adapt based on experience and training and perform human-like functions such as planning, communicating and taking action is a rapidly emerging field in both the commercial and public sectors. The US Department of Defense (DoD) is taking a particular interest in these technologies, just like other major powers China and Russia. Impacts Private innovators will weigh revenue gains against reputational losses before entering contracts with the US defence apparatus. Early adoption of AI-enabled tools will probably be in support functions such as reconnaissance. Such applications are less likely to encounter objections on ethical grounds.


Author(s):  
Y. Selyanin

The US Government has initiated a large-scale activity on artificial intelligence (AI) development and implementation. Numerous departments and agencies including the Pentagon, intelligence community and citizen agencies take part in these efforts. Some of them are responsible for technology, materials and standards development. Others are customers of AI. State AI efforts receive significant budget funding. Moreover, Department of Defense costs on AI are comparable with the whole non-defense funding. American world-leading IT companies support state departments and agencies in organizing AI technologies development and implementation. The USA's highest military and political leadership supports such efforts. Congress provides significant requested funding. However leading specialists criticize the state's approach to creating and implementing AI. Firstly, they consider authorized assignments as not sufficient. Secondly, even this funding is used ineffectively. Therefore Congress created National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) in 2018 for identifying problems in the AI area and developing solutions. This article looks at the stakeholders and participants of the state AI efforts, the budget funding authorization, the major existing problems and the NSCAI conclusions regarding the necessary AI funding in FYs 2021-2032.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1 SI) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Oleksii Onufriienko

The US Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Strategy (2018) as a pilot project of promising e-modernization of the public sector of this country is analyzed, its place among other initiatives on digitalization of public administration of the current US Presidential Administration is determined, its specific public-administrative logic is clarified. the specifics of this project through the prism of the tasks of modernization of public governance in transforming societies.


Author(s):  
Daniel Barreiros ◽  
Ítalo Barreto Poty

This article analyses the US Department of Defense initiative formalized in the Summary of the 2018 Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Strategy. The conclusion is that the US emphasis on the use of artificial intelligence to expand C4ISR capabilities (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance) and the denunciation of “ethical risks’’ involving Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS) are narrative strategies aimed at dealing in the short term with the inability of the US technology agencies to master autonomous military platform technologies and with the Russian resolve on the development of these lethal autonomous military platforms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. S3-S4
Author(s):  
N. Moulson ◽  
A. Fung ◽  
S. Balthazaar ◽  
H. Girgis ◽  
N. Van Woudenberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e38-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishabh Hariharan ◽  
Peter He ◽  
Marcos Meseguer ◽  
Marco Toschi ◽  
Jose Celso Rocha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document