The Supreme Court of the United States and Anarcharsis’ Theory of the Law: A Review Article. Of the book, Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court’s Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America, By Adam Cohen (2020) New York: Penguin Press, 416 pages. ISBN: 978-0-73522-150-5

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 594
Author(s):  
Braham Dabscheck
1988 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-840
Author(s):  
Steven R. Ratner

Petitioner, International Tin Council (ITC), brought an action to stay an American Arbitration Association arbitration that was initiated by respondent, Amalgamet Inc., and that arose out of petitioner’s refusal to honor three contracts for the purchase of tin from respondent. Petitioner claimed that it was immune from suit in the United States by virtue of its status as an international organization under British law, and, in the alternative, that the arbitration clause in its contract with respondent was unenforceable. The Supreme Court of New York County (per Parness, J.) dismissed the petition, and held that petitioner lacked any basis under U.S. law for immunity from legal process and that petitioner had consented to the arbitration clause providing for arbitration in New York.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document