scholarly journals Charles Taylor et l’abandon de la survivance

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-173
Author(s):  
Jean-Félix Chénier

Cet article fait le bilan de la pensée politique du philosophe Charles Taylor et des critiques qui en ont été faites. Il met en lumière le passage d’un libéralisme de la survivance à un projet politique qui appelle à vivre plutôt qu’à survivre, dans le cadre d’un libéralisme fondé sur la participation politique. Cette évolution récente de la pensée du philosophe permet de reformuler une identité culturelle et politique francophone mais ouverte à la différence.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Xavier Scott

This paper examines the transition in political philosophy between the medieval and early-modern periods by focusing on the emergence of sovereignty doctrine. Scholars such as Charles Taylor and John Rawls have focused on the ability of modern-states to overcome conflicts between different religious confessionals. In contrast, this paper seeks to examine some of the peace-promoting features of Latin-Christendom and some of the conflict-promoting features of modern-secular states. The Christian universalism of the medieval period is contrasted with the colonial ventures promoted by the Peace of Westphalia. This paper’s goal is not to argue that secularism is in fact more violent than religion. Rather, it seeks to demonstrate the major role that religion played in early modern philosophy and the development of sovereignty doctrine. It argues against the view that the modern, secular state is capable of neutrality vis-à-vis religion, and also combats the view that the secular nature of modern international law means that it is neutral to the different beliefs and values of the world’s peoples. These observations emphasize the ways in which state power and legitimacy are at the heart of the secular turn in political philosophy. 


2020 ◽  
pp. 84-90
Author(s):  
Jérôme Germain

Prise en tenaille entre une économie de plus en plus prégnante dans la vie quotidienne et une administration de plus en plus paternaliste et intrusive, la participation politique décline immanquablement. Afin de renouer avec le projet émancipateur des Lumières, une nouvelle conception de la citoyenneté, y compris financière, doit être formulée à partir de la découverte de la raison communicationnelle. Il en résulte une approche procédurale et délibérative de la démocratie reposant sur un espace public régénéré et une participation citoyenne dynamisée. À l‘heure de la mondialisation, une citoyenneté financière au plan européen est par ailleurs indispensable à la maîtrise démocratique de nos destins collectifs et de nos libertés individuelles.


Author(s):  
Natalia Marandiuc

The chapter proposes that human beings are conditioned by a double embeddedness: humans are immersed in inescapable frameworks of meaning and shaped by relationships of significance. In dialogue with Charles Taylor, the chapter discusses how these two elements are constitutive features of human subjectivity and how they relate to each other. In order to operate, subjectivity needs a horizon of meaning, which accrues in relationships of attachment that, in turn, thrive under the canopy of common meaning. After discussing the specificity of one such framework, the culture of authenticity, the chapter delves more deeply into one of its paradoxical dimensions: recognition. It is shown how human recognition from loving others is an ineliminable trait for an authentic self, the implication of which is that relationships of significance constitute relational homes that “house” the human self as it grows and flourishes and as it heals when broken.


Author(s):  
Christine Cheng

During the civil war, Liberia’s forestry sector rose to prominence as Charles Taylor traded timber for arms. When the war ended, the UN’s timber sanctions remained in effect, reinforced by the Forestry Development Authority’s (FDA) domestic ban on logging. As Liberians waited for UN timber sanctions to be lifted, a burgeoning domestic timber market developed. This demand was met by artisanal loggers, more commonly referred to as pit sawyers. Out of this illicit economy emerged the Nezoun Group to provide local dispute resolution between the FDA’s tax collectors and ex-combatant pit sawyers. The Nezoun Group posed a dilemma for the government. On the one hand, the regulatory efforts of the Nezoun Group helped the FDA to tax an activity that it had banned. On the other hand, the state’s inability to contain the operations of the Nezoun Group—in open contravention of Liberian laws—highlighted the government’s capacity problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document