Cultivating a “Dissenting Frame of Mind”: Radical Education, the Rhetoric of Inquiry, and Anna Barbauld’s Poetry1

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Sullivan

Abstract True to her origins in a prominent Dissenting family, Anna Aikin Barbauld was cautious in her appraisal of existing (and often oppressive) authority structures. Her work is underscored by her understanding that established power structures are incomplete, sometimes incoherent, and usually dangerous to those that attempt to subvert them. Her poetry shows a sophisticated awareness of hierarchy as a frame of mind that needs to be disrupted and re-modeled, as a poor mental construct that pervades much of our thinking about social roles, gender, and—of course—religious practice. But rather than choosing the path of radicalism and radical idealism, Barbauld accepted the fact that realities do not always respond quickly to new critical understandings. Her poetry engages us in experiences that provoke questions and encourage further inquiry—that seek to establish what might be called a “Dissenting frame of mind.” By juxtaposing the languages of science and nurture, and by transforming ordinary experiences into extraordinary ones, Barbauld disrupts reader expectations and provokes re-evaluation of assumptions, prejudices, and “the normal.” The key to change, for Barbauld, is the ability to “think again.” And her poetry is crafted to help readers do just that.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Wan-Zi Lu

Researchers have demonstrated that local institutional contexts such as organizational networks and leadership cohesion explain the lasting support across developing countries for elite parties originating from former authoritarian regimes. But variation in the emergence of party competition in rural underprivileged populations that were once strong supporters of the regime party requires a thorough examination of local power structures. Analysis of aboriginal societies in Taiwan, based on interviews and ethnographic research, demonstrates that the type of authority structure guides how power relations organize communities and how local elites attain their status. In indigenous communities where inherited hierarchy determines social prestige, chiefs and headmen have retained control of contemporary politics. In contrast, in villages without preexisting hierarchies, big men need to build political influence on personal grounds, which creates room for contestation and the emergence of internal competition for political allegiance. Regression analyses provide further support for these findings and imply that authority structures mediate local communities’ linkage with the party and the state during democratization.


2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Selge ◽  
Johannes Zimmermann ◽  
Jan Scholz ◽  
Max Stille

AbstractIn the context of the vivid activity of Muslim individuals and groups on the Internet and the recent technological developments in the field of computer mediated communication, podcasts offering a wide range of religious information and/or advice to Muslim (and non-Muslim) listeners play an increasingly important role. Being an integral part of the Web 2.0's online landscape and presenting, at the same time, many characteristics of more “traditional” audio media such as cassette recordings, podcasts cannot only be located at the intersection between virtual space and “real world”, but represent, as a medium, also a direct continuation of older forms of Muslim media usage for da'wa-purposes and propagandistic aims. This article attempts to analyze in how far the use of podcasts (and to a smaller extent of videocasts) by Muslim groups and individuals contributes to the emergence of a Muslim online “counter public” sometimes challenging, sometimes reinforcing existing authority structures. Special attention is paid to the question which means and features specific to this new medium Muslim podcasters use to legitimize their religious authority, and to the question in how far established symbol systems commonly relied upon in the Muslim community are used as instruments for the construction of religious online authority and the redistribution of Definitionsmacht. Furthermore, it discusses to what extent questions of “right belief” and “correct religious practice” play a role in these processes. For this purpose, style and content of four selected podcasts (Zaytuna Institute Knowledge Resource Podcast, MeccaOne Media Podcast, Ahmadiyya Podcast, Alt.muslim Review) are analyzed in order to illustrate different ways in which this new medium is used by Muslim groups today. It is shown that podcasts—as part of the overall media spectrum—are used by Muslim groups for internal and external da'wa-purposes, as well as for the reinforcement of existing power and authority structures (e.g. by projecting the presence of the group's leader both into time and into space) and as a means to cope with institutional and communal crisis. They might also become an important instrument not for the (re-)construction, but for the deconstruction of religious authority.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Alexander Noyes ◽  
Frank C. Keil ◽  
Yarrow Dunham

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Koenig ◽  
Alice Eagly
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kennon M. Sheldon ◽  
Richard M. Ryan ◽  
Laird J. Rawsthorne ◽  
Barbara Ilardi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document