scholarly journals State of the art in the treatment of lung cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Jeremic
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
World Wide ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
The Past ◽  
Incurable Disease

<p>Lung cancer is the major cancer killer in both sexes. Despite many biological and technological achievements, it is still mostly an incurable disease, and survival figures are only modestly improved in the past few decades. Optimisation of treatment is usually sought through clinical studies, but unfortunately only a few per cent of lung cancer patients enter these world-wide. So it is in spite of the fact that we have witnessed the introduction of robotic surgery, computerised radiation therapy and targeted agents in daily clinical practice. More emphasis on clinical research is therefore needed to improve our capability to successfully treat lung cancer.</p>

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer Patients with Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease after Thoracic Radiation Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangjuan Li ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Hongyu Wu ◽  
Shixiong Liang ◽  
Yaping Xu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Radiation Pneumonitis ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
The Past ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Previous studies have found that patients with subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) are more susceptible to developing radiation pneumonitis (RP) after thoracic radiation therapy. The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for RP after thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD who were treated with thoracic IMRT with a prescribed dose of ≥50 Gy in our institutions between January 2016 and December 2017.Results: A total of 87 consecutive lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD were selected for the study. The cumulative incidence of grades ≥2 and ≥3 RP at one year was 51.0% and 20.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the mean lung dose (MLD) ≥12Gy was a significant risk factor for grade ≥2 RP (p = 0.049). Chemotherapy with gemcitabine in the past，V5≥50%，and subclinical ILD involving ≥25% of lung volume were significantly associated with grade ≥3 RP (p = 0.046, p = 0.040, and p = 0.024, respectively).Conclusion: MLD is a significant risk factor for grade ≥2 RP. Lung cancer patients who have received chemotherapy with gemcitabine in the past, V5, and those with subclinical ILD involving ≥25% of lung volume have an increased risk of grade ≥3 RP in lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD.

Selecting a PRO-CTCAE based subset for patient reported symptom monitoring during lung cancer treatment (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evalien Veldhuijzen ◽  
Iris Walraven ◽  
Jose Belderbos
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Symptom Monitoring ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND The Patient Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) item library covers a wide range of symptoms relevant for oncology care. To enable implementation of PRO-CTCAE-based symptom monitoring in clinical practice, there is a need to select a subset of items relevant for specific patient populations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop a PRO-CTCAE subset relevant for patients with lung cancer. METHODS The PRO-CTCAE-based subset for lung cancer patients was generated using a mixed methods approach based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines for developing questionnaires, consisting of a literature review and semi-structured interviews with both lung cancer patients and health care practitioners (HCPs). Both patients and HCPs were queried on the relevance and impact of all PRO-CTCAE items. Results were summarized and, after a final round of expert review, a selection of clinically relevant items for lung cancer patients was made. RESULTS A heterogeneous group of lung cancer patients (n=25) from different treatment modalities and HCPs (n=22) participated in the study. A final list of eight relevant PRO-CTCAE items was created: decreased appetite, cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, constipation, nausea, sadness, and pain (general). CONCLUSIONS Based on literature and both professional and patient input, a subset of PRO-CTCAE items has been identified for use in lung cancer patients in clinical practice. Future work is needed to confirm the validity and effectiveness of this PRO-CTCAE lung cancer subset internationally, and in the real-world clinical practice setting.

Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy in a Real-World Setting: Results of an Analysis of Pooled Data from Two Non-Interventional European Studies

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Christian Gessner ◽  
Karin Potthoff ◽  
Nikolaj Frost
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Real World ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common and serious complication in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylaxis with lipegfilgrastim, a glycoPEGylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data from two European non-interventional studies (NIS NADIR and NIS LEOS) investigating lipegfilgrastim for primary and secondary prophylaxis were pooled. Outcomes included the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN), use of anti-infectives and antimycotics, and adverse events and their relationship to lipegfilgrastim. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The safety population included 361 patients with lung cancer (median age, 66 years [range, 36–88]), of whom 322 had received 2 or more consecutive cycles of lipegfilgrastim (efficacy population [primary prophylaxis, 75.5%; secondary prophylaxis, 16.5%]). Almost 40% of the patients were considered to have a high risk (&#x3e;20%) of FN, and around 60% had an intermediate risk (10–20%). For all cycles, FN was reported in 3 patients (0.9%), neutropenia in 14 (4.3%), and grade 4 neutropenia in 9 (2.8%). Anti-infectives were used in 27 patients (8.4%) and antimycotics in 6 (1.9%). The incidence rates were lower for the patients’ first cycle (FN, 0.4%; neutropenia, 0.8%; grade 4 neutropenia, 0.8%; anti-infectives, 0.6%; antimycotics, 0.6%). Adverse drug reactions considered lipegfilgrastim related were reported in 35 patients (9.7%), and serious adverse drug reactions in 10 (2.8%). None of the fatal events reported in 28 patients (7.8%) were lipegfilgrastim related. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Lipegfilgrastim administered to patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice showed similar effectiveness and safety to that reported in published pivotal trials.

scholarly journals Challenges and Novel Opportunities of Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2141
Author(s):  
Paola Anna Jablonska ◽  
Joaquim Bosch-Barrera ◽  
Diego Serrano ◽  
Manuel Valiente ◽  
Alfonso Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Past ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Approximately 20% patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with CNS spread at the time of diagnosis and 25–50% are found to have brain metastases (BMs) during the course of the disease. The improvement in the diagnostic tools and screening, as well as the use of new systemic therapies have contributed to a more precise diagnosis and prolonged survival of lung cancer patients with more time for BMs development. In the past, most of the systemic therapies failed intracranially because of the inability to effectively cross the blood brain barrier. Some of the new targeted therapies, especially the group of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown durable CNS response. However, the use of ionizing radiation remains vital in the management of metastatic brain disease. Although a decrease in CNS-related deaths has been achieved over the past decade, many challenges arise from the need of multiple and repeated brain radiation treatments, which carry along not insignificant risks and toxicity. The combination of stereotactic radiotherapy and systemic treatments in terms of effectiveness and adverse effects, such as radionecrosis, remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This review discusses the challenges of the use of radiation therapy in NSCLC BMs in view of different systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, TKIs and immunotherapy. It also outlines the future perspectives and strategies for personalized BMs management.

scholarly journals Effect of deformable registration on the dose calculated in radiation therapy planning CT scans of lung cancer patients a)

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra R. Cunliffe ◽  
Clay Contee ◽  
Samuel G. Armato ◽  
Bradley White ◽  
Julia Justusson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Deformable Registration ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Therapy Planning ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Radiation Therapy Planning ◽  
Planning Ct
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document