scholarly journals You Got This: Taking a Leadership Role in Your IEP Meeting

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Rao ◽  
Laura Golden ◽  
Marsha Langer Ellison
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Public Schools ◽  
Transition Planning ◽  
Leadership Role ◽  
Individualized Education Programs ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Iep Meeting

This tip sheet provides tips for how students (ages 3 to 21) who receive special education services in public schools can take a leadership role in their individualized education programs (IEP) and transition planning.

Why Working Apart Doesn’t Work at All: Special Education and English Learner Teacher Collaborations

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Sara E. N. Kangas
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Public Schools ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
English Learner ◽  
Individualized Education Programs ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Linguistic Development ◽  
Synergistic Relationships ◽  
Learning English

With many students learning English also identified with disabilities in public schools, collaborations across special education and English learner (EL) education are critical to promoting these students’ academic and linguistic development. Yet, many special education and EL teachers work independently of one another, focusing on their own specialized roles. In the process, students with disabilities who are learning English receive fragmented, inadequate special education and EL services. This article provides specific strategies—cocreating individualized education programs and instituting consultations—special education and EL teachers can implement to break out of their isolated roles and to build synergistic relationships that benefit the learning of students with disabilities who are learning English.

scholarly journals Contention Between English as a Second Language and Special Education Services for Emergent Bilinguals with Disabilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56
Author(s):  
Solange A. Lopes-Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Second Language ◽  
Public Schools ◽  
Emergent Bilinguals ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Language Abilities ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Steady Growth

The debate surrounding the prioritization of services for emergent bilinguals with disabilities is an area in need of attention. The generalized belief that disability-related services must take priority over English as a Second Language services suggests that there is a critical need to develop school professionals’ understanding that these learners, in addition to receiving special education services, need substantial support in developing their second language abilities. The steady growth of emergent bilinguals and multilinguals in public schools, that is, students acquiring English as a new language, calls for well-trained practitioners able to meet these students’ diverse linguistic, academic, cultural, emotional, and intellectual needs. The typical challenges this population faces acquiring a new language have, well too often, been misrepresented, neglected, or led them to programs for students with true disabilities. However, when emergent bilinguals are legitimately referred to special education, it is not uncommon for their disability-related needs to be prioritized over their English as a Second Language-related needs, and they end up not receiving the support they need to develop social and academic skills in the new language. This review article is intended to stimulate reflection on the types of services being delivered to emergent bilinguals and multilinguals with disabilities in U.S. public school settings.

scholarly journals Bullying and Victimization among Students in Special Education and General Education Curricula

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A Rose ◽  
Dorthy L Espelage ◽  
Steven R Aragon ◽  
John Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Middle School Students ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
School Students ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Univer Sity

International research established over a decade ago that students who are en-rolled in special education curricula are victimized and perpetrate more bullying than their general education peers. However, few empirical studies have exam-ined bullying rates among American schoolchildren who receive special education services. In the current study, a sample of middle school students (n = 1009) enrolled in general and special education programs completed the Univer-sity of Illinois bullying, fighting, and victimization scales. As hypothesized, students with disabilities reported higher rates of victimization and fighting be-haviours than students without disabilities. Conversely, students with disabilities and their general education peers reported similar rates of bully perpetration.

Describing the Composition of Individualized Education Plans for Students With Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Harvey ◽  
Kelly Farquharson ◽  
Whitney Schneider-Cline ◽  
Erin Bush ◽  
Christina Yeager Pelatti
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Individualized Education Plans ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Education Plans

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the features of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for a cohort of students with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to help elucidate current special education practices for students with TBI. Method We obtained permission from administrators of a local school district of 41,000 students in a Midwestern state to review de-identified IEP records of students verified with TBI. We examined demographic information (i.e., cause and age at time of injury), IEP services and intensity, IEP goal categories, and previous verification status. Results Descriptive results support that intervention services were more intense for students with TBI with greater lengths of time postinjury. Target behaviors within goals were more often related to math and reading than to the cognitive processes that govern these skills, such as attention, memory, and executive functioning. Finally, more than a third of our sample had been verified with a disability and were receiving special education services via an IEP prior to their TBI. Conclusions This work represents an important first step in understanding the special education services for students with TBI. Future research should explore interventions that are ecologically valid for school-based settings and are developed to address the idiosyncratic deficits of students with TBI, particularly interventions that focus on the underlying cognitive processes experienced by these students.

scholarly journals Evaluating Parent Participation in Individualized Education Programs by Opinions of Parents and Teachers

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ş. Şenay İlik ◽  
Rukiye Konuk Er
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Special Needs ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Parent Participation ◽  
Individualized Education Programs ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Iep Process ◽  
Descriptive Survey

All individuals who are responsible for the education of learners with special needs must actively participate in Individualized Education Programs (IEP). Moreover, IEP is a common ground encouraging educators and parents to work together on an education plan. This study aims to evaluate the opinions of both parents and teachers regarding parent participation in IEP. The qualitative approach was used in this study. To profoundly examine the opinions of parents and special education teachers and to make them explain it in their own words, descriptive survey model, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. Descriptive survey model enables to organize data according to the themes put forward by the research questions and to present it by considering questions and dimensions. The purposive sampling method was used in this study to obtain more detailed information regarding the opinions of special education teachers and parents with children with special needs about the preparation and implementation process of IEP. 22 teachers and 25 parents participated in the study. Data were analyzed through content analysis. It was found that most of the parents do not know anything about IEP. It was also found that parents are not involved in the IEP process and they are not invited by the school/institution. As for the opinions of teachers, it was found that they have some problems about getting the parents to involve in the IEP process. It was seen that teachers are lack of knowledge regarding how to include parents in the IEP process.

The Effect of Early Childhood Intervention and Subsequent Special Education Services: Findings from the Chicago Child-Parent Centers

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza M. Conyers ◽  
Arthur J. Reynolds ◽  
Suh-Ruu Ou
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Public Schools ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Family Background ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Special Education Placement ◽  
Preschool Intervention ◽  
Long Term Impact

This article explores patterns of special education services during the elementary grades among children who participated in either the Child-Parent Center (CPC) Preschool Program or other early childhood programs in the Chicago Public Schools. The study sample included 1,377 low-income, racial minority children in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Controlling for family background characteristics that might affect educational performance, children who participated in Child-Parent Center preschool had a significantly lower rate of special education placement (12.5%) than the comparison group (18.4%), who participated in an alternative all-day kindergarten program. The estimated impact of CPC preschool intervention was best explained by the cognitive advantage hypothesis. This article provides support for the long-term impact of the CPC preschool intervention on special education outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document