scholarly journals Using Peer Review to Support Development of Community Resources for Research Data Management

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Soyka ◽  
◽  
Amber Budden ◽  
Viv Hutchison ◽  
David Bloom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Community Resources ◽  
Research Data Management

scholarly journals Research Data Management Among Life Sciences Faculty: Implications for Library Service

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Johnson ◽  
Vicky Steeves
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Life Sciences ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Federally Funded ◽  
Library Service ◽  
Funded Research ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Significant Variability

Pending peer review and publication. Following the 2013 release of the Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research memorandum, research data management (RDM) has been the target of increased interest and development among both researchers and librarians. Widespread evidence of significant variability in practices and attitudes indicates that librarians should evaluate their specific patron base as they approach service development. The authors issued a survey to estimate actual and perceived research data management needs of NYU's life sciences faculty in order to understand how the library could best contribute to the research lifecycle.

scholarly journals Data meets history: A research data management strategy for the historically oriented humanities

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-178
Author(s):  
Fabian Cremer ◽  
Silvia Daniel ◽  
Marina Lemaire ◽  
Katrin Moeller ◽  
Matthias Razum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Management Strategy ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Research Data Management

In defense of decentralized research data management

Neuroforum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hanke ◽  
Franco Pestilli ◽  
Adina S. Wagner ◽  
Christopher J. Markiewicz ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Poline ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cloud Computing ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Data Archive ◽  
Individual Scientist ◽  
Computing Platform ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Cloud Computing Platform ◽  
Research Objects ◽  
Central Services

Abstract Decentralized research data management (dRDM) systems handle digital research objects across participating nodes without critically relying on central services. We present four perspectives in defense of dRDM, illustrating that, in contrast to centralized or federated research data management solutions, a dRDM system based on heterogeneous but interoperable components can offer a sustainable, resilient, inclusive, and adaptive infrastructure for scientific stakeholders: An individual scientist or laboratory, a research institute, a domain data archive or cloud computing platform, and a collaborative multisite consortium. All perspectives share the use of a common, self-contained, portable data structure as an abstraction from current technology and service choices. In conjunction, the four perspectives review how varying requirements of independent scientific stakeholders can be addressed by a scalable, uniform dRDM solution and present a working system as an exemplary implementation.

scholarly journals Archiving South African digital research data: How ready are we?

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 112 (Number 7/8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Koopman ◽  
Karin de Jager ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
South African ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Systematic Research ◽  
Data Archiving ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
The University ◽  
Digital Research

Abstract Digital data archiving and research data management have become increasingly important for institutions in South Africa, particularly after the announcement by the National Research Foundation, one of the principal South African academic research funders, recommending these actions for the research that they fund. A case study undertaken during the latter half of 2014, among the biological sciences researchers at a South African university, explored the state of data management and archiving at this institution and the readiness of researchers to engage with sharing their digital research data through repositories. It was found that while some researchers were already engaged with digital data archiving in repositories, neither researchers nor the university had implemented systematic research data management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document