scholarly journals Unita di consumo dei farmaci e valutazioni farmacoeconomiche: uso e misuso di DDD e PDD

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Eandi

In pharmacoeconomical evaluations the quantification of drug utilization has to be done on the basis of measurement units that allow comparisons among series of longitudinal and transversal data. The most common techniques used for the analysis and the comparison of drug utilization patterns are based either on the Defined Daily Dose (DDD), a unit system proposed by WHO’s Drug Utilization Research Group, or on the Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD), a statistical parameter obtained from the analysis of drug prescriptions. This article illustrates the meaning of the main indicators of drug consumption that can be build with these techniques, underlining their utility and limitations. The DDD is the conventionally established theoretical mean daily dose of a drug, referred to a way of administration and to its main indication. It is, therefore, a mere technical measurement unit that cannot be interpreted as mean prescribed or consumed dose, and even less as recommended dose. The PDD, on the contrary, is not a measurement unit but a statistical mean value, that expresses the central tendency of the prescription variability in a defined setting. Starting from Italian data on the consumption of wide-spread antibiotics, the use and interpretation of various indicators based on the DDDs and PDDs are discussed. The parameters derived with the DDD technique are suitable for monitoring drug utilization and pharmaceutical expenditure. The PDD method is more direct, indicates the mean quantities actually prescribed and permits the estimation of the total dose consumed per therapeutic cycle and of other clinically relevant parameters, but requires the acquisition of more data than the other technique does. It is also important to remark the fact that both methods can’t be directly used for economical evaluations trying to assess the efficiency of resource allocation, as they are not correlated to the clinical outcomes of the therapy.

Author(s):  
Catarina Abrantes ◽  
Fernanda S. Tonin ◽  
Joana Reis‐Pardal ◽  
Margarida Castel‐Branco ◽  
Claudia Furtado ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 994-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham G. Hartzema ◽  
Miquel S. Porta ◽  
Hugh H. Tilson ◽  
Joaquima Serradell ◽  
Darrel C. Bjornson ◽  
...  

This paper in the series on pharmacoepidemiology describes the history, development, and present status of drug utilization activities. The various methodologies employed in drug utilization studies are evaluated and presented along with a listing of the principal drug databases available for drug utilization research. An analysis is presented comparing the validity of drug consumption rates based on individual patient usage or drug cost data as adopted in North America and the defined daily dose unit as developed in Europe. Drug utilization derives its importance in pharmacoepidemiology from the fact that it provides the methodological rigor for defining the denominator data needed in pharmacoepidemiological research.


Author(s):  
Dhivya Govindasamy ◽  
Gandhibabu Ramanathan ◽  
Talari Venkata Siva Prasad ◽  
Gopalakrishnan Ganesan

Background: The objective of the study was to assess drug utilization pattern and cost analysis among the psychiatric patients treated with various benzodiazepine derivatives.Methods: This observational study was conducted in department of psychiatric, RMMCH, Annamalai University. The study period was 6 months (November 2018 to April 2019). A total of 50 psychiatric patients were included.Results: A total 50 patients among them 64% (32) males and 36% (18) female, were included in the study. Most of the patient were between the age groups of 18-29 years (30%). The most common clinical condition treated with benzodiazepines were alcohol dependence syndrome/alcohol withdrawal syndrome/ alcohol related psychotic disorder (34%). The majority of patients were prescribed with clonazepam (66.67%). The defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days of benzodiazepines were found to be 0.89. In this study the comparison of cost analysis for the drug used and it was found that lorazepam (122%) are most expensive followed by chlordiazepoxide (93.3%) and clonazepam (78.57%). The cheapest drug was nitrazepam (36.84%).Conclusions: The majority of the patient admitted in the psychiatric department were suffering from Alcohol depending syndrome/alcohol withdrawal syndrome. The most commonly prescribed benzodiazepine was clonazepam followed by lorazepam and least prescribed diazepam and nitrazepam based on defined daily dose concept.


Author(s):  
K. Padmavathi ◽  
S. A. Arun Raaj ◽  
S. Subash ◽  
C. K. Dhanapal ◽  
S. Periasamy

Background: The objectives of the study were to use the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification (ATC) /defined daily dose (DDD) concept to study the drug utilization pattern in geriatric patients in a rural tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods: An observational study was conducted at Rajah Muthiah Medical College Hospital (OPD and IPD) over a period of six months from November 2018 to April 2019. The data was collected from 204 patients using specially designed data collection form. The patients were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 204 patients were included in this study. The study population consisting of males 130 (63.7%) and females 74 (36.2%). Diseases related to the cardiovascular system 67 (32.84%) were the most common cause for the geriatric patients to attend the hospital, followed by surgical diseases 47 (23.03%), Oncological diseases 2 (0.98%) were the least frequency encountered. The average number of drugs prescribed per prescription was 8.79. Out of 1795 drugs prescribed, 60.86% of drugs were prescribed in generic form, and 39.14% were prescribed in brand name. The study analysed that 71.25% of drugs prescribed were from essential drug list (EDL) 2016-2018. Number of prescriptions with an injection was 74.04%. Paracetamol (N02B01) was the most frequently prescribed drug, followed by Amlodipine (C08CA01), Dexamethasone (H02AB02), Clopidogrel (B01AC04), Ferrous sulfate (B03AA07), Acetylsalicylic acid (B01AC06), Hydrocortisone (H02AB09), Tamsulosin (G04CA02), Atorvastatin (C10AA05), Furosemide (C03CA01).Conclusions: Drug utilization study can help in evaluating the quality of care given to the geriatric patients and promote rational use of medicines.


Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Faizah Safina Bakrin ◽  
Mohd Makmor-Bakry ◽  
Wan Hazmy Che Hon ◽  
Shafeeq Mohd Faizal ◽  
Mohamed Mansor Manan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Drug utilization of analgesics in a private healthcare setting is useful to examine their prescribing patterns, especially the newer injectable cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs). Objectives: To evaluate the utilization of coxibs and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) indicated for postoperative orthopaedic pain control using defined daily dose (DDD) and ratio of use density to use rate (UD/UR). Method: A retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at an inpatient department of a private teaching hospital in Seremban, Malaysia was conducted. Patients’ demographic characteristics, medications prescribed, clinical lab results, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and length of hospital stay were documented. Orthopaedic surgeries, namely arthroscopy, reconstructive, and fracture fixation, were included. Stratified random sampling was used to select patients. Data were collected through patients’ medical records. The DDD per 100 admissions and the indicator UD/UR were calculated with the World Health Organization’s DDD as a benchmark. The inclusion criteria were patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery prescribed with coxibs (celecoxib capsules, etoricoxib tablets, parecoxib injections) and tNSAIDs (dexketoprofen injections, diclofenac sodium tablets). Data were analysed descriptively. This research was approved by the academic institution and the hospital research ethics committee. Result: A total of 195 records of patients who received NSAIDs were randomly selected among 1169 cases. In term of the types of orthopaedic surgery, the ratio of included records for arthroscopy:fracture fixation:reconstructive surgery was 55.4:35.9:8.7. Most of the inpatients had low rates of common comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease as supported by their baseline parameters. The majority were not prescribed with other concomitant prescriptions that could cause drug interaction (74.9%), or gastroprotective agents (77.4%). Overall, DDDs per 100 admissions for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for parecoxib injections (389.23). The UD/UR for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for etoricoxib tablets (105.75) and parecoxib injections (108.00). Discussion: As per guidelines, the majority (96.9%) received other analgesics to ensure a multimodal approach was carried out to control pain. From the UD/UR results, the arthroscopy surgery was probably the most appropriate in terms of NSAID utilization. Conclusion: The prescribing pattern of NSAIDs except parecoxib was appropriate based on adverse effect and concurrent medication profile. The findings of this DUR provide insight for a low-risk patient population at a private specialized teaching hospital on the recommended use of NSAIDs for postoperative orthopaedic pain control.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 117739361770334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Lahiry ◽  
Avijit Kundu ◽  
Ayan Mukherjee ◽  
Shouvik Choudhury ◽  
Rajasree Sinha

Objective: To analyze drug utilization (DU) pattern of antidiabetes drug (ADD) prescription in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in rural West Bengal based on 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) Index. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Prescription data of 600 elderly patients (age > 60 years) attending outpatient clinic were screened over 12 months (January 2015 to January 2016) from 5 different rural hospitals in West Bengal. Pooled data were sorted and classified in accordance with 2016 ATC/DDD WHO Index. Direct cost associated and consumption of ADD were measured as DDD/1000 patients/day. The adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to antidiabetic medicines were monitored. Results: During the study period, mean age of patients recorded was 66.4 ± 5.0 years, with 66.6% (n = 396) having history of T2DM > 5 years. Follow-up encounters (n = 2328) revealed metformin (94.67%), sulfonylureas (SUs) (50.54%), pioglitazone (24.22%), voglibose (22.50%), insulin (9.75%), and acarbose (6.82%) to be more prevalent, constituting DU 90% (92.01%). Combination of metformin plus SU was recorded in most of the patients (56%). Insulin, however, was found to be an underutilized class ( P < .005). The DDD/1000 patients/day of metformin (2.918), glimepiride (1.577), and gliclazide (0.069) conformed to 2016 WHO ATC/DDD Index. The total ADD consumption during study period was 5.03 DDD/1000 patients/day. The average drug cost per encounter per day was Rs 11.24 ± 2.01. Nineteen ADRs were reported and their descriptions were found to be of hypoglycemia (n = 9), pedal edema (n = 2), and gastrointestinal upsets (n = 8). Target glycemic status was achieved in 40% monthly follow-up encounters. Low-store drug availability and poor compliance to treatment (>60%) were major determinants. Lack of regular aerobic exercises (>85%) and proper knowledge regarding medical nutrition therapy (MNT) (>80%) and low average consultation time (3.5 ± 0.6 minutes) were important contributing factors. Conclusions: The study exhibited increased utilization of 2 drug combinations of oral ADD and lower utilization of insulin during study period. Such inferences merit further exploration.


Author(s):  
T. Muneswar Reddy ◽  
Thammi Setty Durga Prasad ◽  
Allikesam Hemalatha ◽  
Vanam Chanukya ◽  
Bandi Lakshmi Sirisha

Background: This study was conducted to determine the drug utilization pattern among geriatric inpatients in general medicine department of the hospital.Methods: An observational, prospective study was conducted for a period of six months (November 2016 to April 2017) among 200 geriatric patients; demographic details, education, occupation, diagnosis and drug details were recorded. The drugs were categorized by anatomical therapeutic classification (ATC) and defined daily dose (DDD) was calculated. The World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators were assessed.Results: The majority of the patients (59%) were in age group of 60-69 years. Cardiovascular diseases were common among geriatrics. Most commonly prescribed drug was Pantoprazole (81.7%). Drugs were assigned with ATC/DDD codes according to the guidelines of WHO. Drugs prescribed by their generic names were 56.64% and 43% of drugs that were included in the National Essential Medicines List.Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist have to collaborate and work together with physicians in selecting and adjusting the dose among geriatric population in order to reduce development of potential adverse drug reactions, serious drug related complications and drug interaction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Laerta Kakariqi

Aim: To evaluate the patterns of use of the out-of-hospital Anti-Asthmatic drugs in Albania during the period 2004-2014. Methods: The study was retrospective and we analyzed the prescription and consumption of these drug classes in the primary health care in Albania during 2004-2014. All data were collected from Health Insurance Institute (HII)[1] and analysed reflecting the ambulatory and outpatient use for the period 2004-2014. The data about the consumption of drugs were expressed as a number of Defined Daily Dose (DDDs) /1000 inhabitants/day. Utilization was measured in DDD/1000 inhabitants/day and was also compared with Bronchial Asthma morbidity/1000 inhabitants, to understand the covering of the population from the reimbursement scheme. For all the period under study 2004-2014, there were collected and analysed the data of import and domestic production of drugs, which altogether represent the real consumption of drugs in the country. These data were subsequently included in a comparative analysis with the utilization data according to the HII. Results: The values of consumption of Anti-Asthmatic drugs were 6.62-8.48 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day respectively in 2004-2014. 2.14-3.76 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day constitute the consumption of beta2 agonists and 2.66-3.69 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day is the consumption of corticosteroids. In addition, it turns out that the consumption of beclometasone and the association Beta-2-mimetic-corticosteroids (salmeterol+fluticasone) based on HII data is superior to the consumption of this forms based on Import data, which cannot be true. This finding probably reflects fictive prescriptions and the entry of drugs by contraband. During some years of our study we notice that the consumption of Antiasthmatic drugs is higher than the morbidity level (cases/1000 inhabitants). Conclusions There is only a small increase in the national consumption of Anti-Asthmatic drugs during these years, but the values still remain very low in comparison with other countries. Less than 40% of the consumption of beta2 agonists is covered from the reimbursement scheme. In addition, it results that the scheme covers about 50% of antiasthmatic drugs consumption.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Laerta Kakariqi

Aim: To evaluate the patterns of use of the out-of-hospital Anti-Asthmatic drugs in Albania during the period 2004-2014. Methods: The study was retrospective and we analyzed the prescription and consumption of these drug classes in the primary health care in Albania during 2004-2014. All data were collected from Health Insurance Institute (HII)[1] and analysed reflecting the ambulatory and outpatient use for the period 2004-2014. The data about the consumption of drugs were expressed as a number of Defined Daily Dose (DDDs) /1000 inhabitants/day. Utilization was measured in DDD/1000 inhabitants/day and was also compared with Bronchial Asthma morbidity/1000 inhabitants, to understand the covering of the population from the reimbursement scheme. For all the period under study 2004-2014, there were collected and analysed the data of import and domestic production of drugs, which altogether represent the real consumption of drugs in the country. These data were subsequently included in a comparative analysis with the utilization data according to the HII. Results: The values of consumption of Anti-Asthmatic drugs were 6.62-8.48 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day respectively in 2004-2014. 2.14-3.76 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day constitute the consumption of beta2 agonists and 2.66-3.69 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day is the consumption of corticosteroids. In addition, it turns out that the consumption of beclometasone and the association Beta-2-mimetic-corticosteroids (salmeterol+fluticasone) based on HII data is superior to the consumption of this forms based on Import data, which cannot be true. This finding probably reflects fictive prescriptions and the entry of drugs by contraband. During some years of our study we notice that the consumption of Antiasthmatic drugs is higher than the morbidity level (cases/1000 inhabitants). Conclusions There is only a small increase in the national consumption of Anti-Asthmatic drugs during these years, but the values still remain very low in comparison with other countries. Less than 40% of the consumption of beta2 agonists is covered from the reimbursement scheme. In addition, it results that the scheme covers about 50% of antiasthmatic drugs consumption.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document