scholarly journals Size profile of cell-free DNA: A beacon guiding the practice and innovation of clinical testing

Theranostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4737-4748
Author(s):  
Jiping Shi ◽  
Runling Zhang ◽  
Jinming Li ◽  
Rui Zhang
2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. E1317-E1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiyong Jiang ◽  
Carol W. M. Chan ◽  
K. C. Allen Chan ◽  
Suk Hang Cheng ◽  
John Wong ◽  
...  

The analysis of tumor-derived circulating cell-free DNA opens up new possibilities for performing liquid biopsies for the assessment of solid tumors. Although its clinical potential has been increasingly recognized, many aspects of the biological characteristics of tumor-derived cell-free DNA remain unclear. With respect to the size profile of such plasma DNA molecules, a number of studies reported the finding of increased integrity of tumor-derived plasma DNA, whereas others found evidence to suggest that plasma DNA molecules released by tumors might be shorter. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of the size profiles of plasma DNA in 90 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 67 with chronic hepatitis B, 36 with hepatitis B-associated cirrhosis, and 32 healthy controls. We used massively parallel sequencing to achieve plasma DNA size measurement at single-base resolution and in a genome-wide manner. Tumor-derived plasma DNA molecules were further identified with the use of chromosome arm-levelz-score analysis (CAZA), which facilitated the studying of their specific size profiles. We showed that populations of aberrantly short and long DNA molecules existed in the plasma of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The short ones preferentially carried the tumor-associated copy number aberrations. We further showed that there were elevated amounts of plasma mitochondrial DNA in the plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Such molecules were much shorter than the nuclear DNA in plasma. These results have improved our understanding of the size profile of tumor-derived circulating cell-free DNA and might further enhance our ability to use plasma DNA as a molecular diagnostic tool.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11551-11551
Author(s):  
Lino Moehrmann ◽  
Helen J. Huang ◽  
David S. Hong ◽  
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
...  

11551 Background: Blood-based liquid biopsies offer easy accessible genomic material for molecular diagnostics in cancer. Commonly used cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from dying cells. In contrast exosomal nucleic acid (exoNA) originates from living cells, which can better reflect underlying cancer biology. Methods: We isolated exoNA (EXO52) and cfDNA (QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid kit) from plasma of patients with progressing advanced cancers and tested for BRAFV600, KRASG12/G13, and EGFRexon19del/L858R mutations using next-generation sequencing (EXO1000), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, QX200) and BEAMing digital PCR. The results were compared to clinical testing of archival tumor tissue and correlated with survival. Results: Of the 43 patients (colorectal cancer, 20; melanoma, 8; non-small cell lung cancer, 6; ovarian cancer, 2; papillary thyroid cancer, 2; other cancers, 5) 41 had a mutation in the tumor tissue (20 [47%] BRAF mutation, 17 [40%] KRAS mutation and 4 [9%] EGFR mutation). Mutation testing of plasma exoNA from all 43 patients detected 39 (95%) of 41 mutations present in tumor tissue with 100% specificity. Mutation testing of plasma cfDNA from 39 patients using ddPCR detected 33 (89%) of 37 mutations present in tumor and testing of plasma cfDNA from 37 patients using BEAMing detected 34 (97%) of 35 mutations present in tumor tissue; however, both cfDNA methods reported an additional KRAS mutation not present in tumor tissue. Patients with high mutation allele frequency (MAF, > median) had shorter median survival compared to patients with low MAF ( < median) when using exoNA (5.9 vs. 11.8 months, P= 0.006), but not cfDNA ddPCR (6.0 vs. 7.4 months, P= 0.06) or cfDNA BEAMing (6.5 vs. 7.4 month, P= 0.07). High MAF in exoNA was an independent prognostic factor for survival in multicovariate analysis (HR 0.13, P= 0.017). Conclusions: Mutation testing of plasma exoNA for common BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR mutations has high sensitivity compared to clinical testing of archival tumor tissue and better specificity than PCR testing of plasma cfDNA. High MAF in exoNA is the independent prognostic factor for shorter survival.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 304-OR
Author(s):  
CHANG ZENG ◽  
YING YANG ◽  
ZHOU ZHANG ◽  
CHUAN HE ◽  
WEI ZHANG ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K. G. Avetisova ◽  
◽  
S. V. Kostyuk ◽  
E. V. Kostyuk ◽  
E. S. Ershova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dnase I ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document