scholarly journals Tumoral Pyruvate Kinase L/R as a Predictive Marker for the Treatment of Renal Cancer Patients with Sunitinib and Sorafenib

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3224-3231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjut Niinivirta ◽  
Gunilla Enblad ◽  
Cecilia Lindskog ◽  
Fredrik Pontén ◽  
Anca Dragomir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pyruvate Kinase ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Predictive Marker

scholarly journals Tumoral ANXA1 Is a Predictive Marker for Sunitinib Treatment of Renal Cancer Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (19) ◽  
pp. 3975-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjut Niinivirta ◽  
Gunilla Enblad ◽  
Per-Henrik Edqvist ◽  
Fredrik Pontén ◽  
Anca Dragomir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Sunitinib Treatment

scholarly journals Tumoral cubilin is a predictive marker for treatment of renal cancer patients with sunitinib and sorafenib

2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjut Niinivirta ◽  
Gunilla Enblad ◽  
Per-Henrik Edqvist ◽  
Fredrik Pontén ◽  
Anca Dragomir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Predictive Marker

Neutrophil/lymphocyte Ratio after Flow Citometry Periferic Blood Cell Detection - Predictive Marker of Anastomotic Fistula in Colorectal Cancer Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 295-306
Author(s):  
Dumitru Radulescu ◽  
Vlad Dumitru Baleanu ◽  
Andrei Nicolaescu ◽  
Marius Lazar ◽  
Marius Bica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Cell Detection ◽  
Colon And Rectal Surgery ◽  
Optimal Value ◽  
Anastomotic Fistula ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Anastomotic fistula is a dreadful complication of colon and rectal surgery that can put life into danger, being common after colorectal surgery. The preoperative lymphocyte neutrophil ratio (NLR) is known as a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer patients. The existence of a predictive marker of anastomotic fistula in colorectal cancer patients is not fully undestood, so we proposed to investigate the utility of preoperative NLR as a predictor of anastomotic fistula formation. This study the Neutrophils and lymphocytes were detected from periferic blood using flow citometry. We retrospectively evaluated 161 patients with colorectal cancer, who were treated curatively, in which at least one anastomosis was performed, comparing NLR values between patients who had fistula and those with normal healing, then comparing the group with low NLR, with the group with increased NLR, after finding the optimal value of NLR using the ROC curve.The optimal value of the NLR after establishing the cutoff value was 3.07. Between the low NLR group (n=134) and the high NLR group (n=27), were observed statistically significant differences in fistula (p [0.001) and death (p=0.001). The odds ratio for failure in the group with increased NLR was 10.37, which means that patients with NLR]3.54 have a chance of developing anastomotic fistula greater than 10.37 comparable to patients with lower NLR. We suggest the preoperative use of NLR can be used as a predictive marker of anastomotic fistula than can increase the quality of preoperative preparation and therefore the establishment of the optimal surgical technique that can lead to anastomotic fistula risk decrease.

scholarly journals MCM3 upregulation confers endocrine resistance in breast cancer and is a predictive marker of diminished tamoxifen benefit

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Løkkegaard ◽  
Daniel Elias ◽  
Carla L. Alves ◽  
Martin V. Bennetzen ◽  
Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Primary Tumors

AbstractResistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is a major clinical problem with poorly understood mechanisms. There is an unmet need for prognostic and predictive biomarkers to allow appropriate therapeutic targeting. We evaluated the mechanism by which minichromosome maintenance protein 3 (MCM3) influences endocrine resistance and its predictive/prognostic potential in ER+ breast cancer. We discovered that ER+ breast cancer cells survive tamoxifen and letrozole treatments through upregulation of minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs), including MCM3, which are key molecules in the cell cycle and DNA replication. Lowering MCM3 expression in endocrine-resistant cells restored drug sensitivity and altered phosphorylation of cell cycle regulators, including p53(Ser315,33), CHK1(Ser317), and cdc25b(Ser323), suggesting that the interaction of MCM3 with cell cycle proteins is an important mechanism of overcoming replicative stress and anti-proliferative effects of endocrine treatments. Interestingly, the MCM3 levels did not affect the efficacy of growth inhibitory by CDK4/6 inhibitors. Evaluation of MCM3 levels in primary tumors from four independent cohorts of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen mono-therapy or no adjuvant treatment, including the Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial, showed MCM3 to be an independent prognostic marker adding information beyond Ki67. In addition, MCM3 was shown to be a predictive marker of response to endocrine treatment. Our study reveals a coordinated signaling network centered around MCM3 that limits response to endocrine therapy in ER+ breast cancer and identifies MCM3 as a clinically useful prognostic and predictive biomarker that allows personalized treatment of ER+ breast cancer patients.

Retrospective analysis on safety and efficacy of everolimus in treatment of metastatic renal cancer patients receiving dialysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 3159-3166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Guida ◽  
Cristina Masini ◽  
Michele Milella ◽  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cancer ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Retrospective study for the characterization of COVID-19 in renal cancer (COVID-REN) patients treated with antiangiogenics or immunotherapy and outcome comparison with non-infected cases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4577-4577
Author(s):  
Jesus Garcia Donas ◽  
Guillermo de Velasco ◽  
Teresa Alonso Gordoa ◽  
Jesús Chamorro ◽  
Diana Rosero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Advanced Renal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Outcome Comparison ◽  
Cancer Outcome ◽  
The Impact

4577 Background: Cancer is recognized as a major risk factor for severe COVID19. However little is known about the impact of oncologic treatments in the evolution of the disease. On the other hand, the influence of SARS-CoV2 in cancer response remains to be established. We aim to determine both aspects in renal cancer patients receiving different therapeutic options. Methods: We designed a retrospective case-control study to compare the outcome of patients with advanced renal cancer who developed COVID19 under antiangiogenic treatment (cohort A [ChA]) vs immunotherapy (alone or in combination: cohort B [ChB]) vs matched controls (cohort C [ChC]). Controls were renal cancer patients who were not infected during the period of study. One control per case was selected regarding age, gender, kidney cancer histology and type of treatment. Results: From May 20 to Feb 21, 80 patients were recruited. We present the first 55 patients included (15 ChA, 16 ChB and 20 ChC, 4 patients were screening failure) from 13 centers in Spain. Median age was 62 (range 25 to 88) overall and 62 (range 44 to 88) in Ch A, 64,5 (range 42 to 83) in ChB and 61 (range 41 to 77) in ChC. 38 patients were male and 13 were female. Overall 45 cases were clear cell carcinoma (13 ChA, 14 ChB and 18 ChC), 4 papillary (1 ChA, 2 ChB and 1 ChC), 1 chromophobe (ChA) and 1 unclassified (ChC). Median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (range 1 to 6) overall, (1 [range 1 to 4] in ChA, 2 [range 1 to 4] in ChB and 2 [range 1 to 6] in ChC). 25 patients required treatment interruptions (8 in ChA [32%], 14 in ChB [56%] and 3 [12%] in ChC). 9 patients were hospitalized (4 in Ch A, 5 in ChB and none in ChC) for a median of 10 days (range 4 to 16) overall (7 [range 4 to 14] in ChA and 12 [range 5 to 16] in ChB). No patient required ICU admission. Best tumor response was complete or partial (CR+PR) in 25 patients (5 [20%] in ChA, 9 [36%] in ChB and 11 [44%] in ChC). Clinical benefit (CR+PR+stable disease) was observed in 38 patients (11 [28,9%] in ChA, 10 [26,3%] in ChB and 17 [44,7%] in ChC). One patient in ChB died (due to COVID19). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: Patients with renal cancer who developed COVID19 held treatment more frequently and presented lower clinical benefit rates than non infected cases. Patients receiving immunotherapy required more frequent dose interruptions and longer hospitalizations than cases on antiangiogenics. These results point to an impact of SARS-CoV2 in renal cancer outcome. Therapies administered to treat renal cancer, could play a role in the evolution of COVID19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document