scholarly journals Aligning Effectiveness, Secretion of Interleukin 1β and Pain Control During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with Self-Ligating Appliances and Supplemental Vibrational Appliances. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zamira Kalemaj ◽  
Jacopo Buti ◽  
Andrea Deregibus ◽  
Rosana Maria Canuto ◽  
Marina Maggiora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Interleukin 1Β ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals The Effect of Rhythmic Breathing on the Severity of Sternotomy Pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hassan Babamohamadi ◽  
Masoumeh Karkeabadi ◽  
Abbasali Ebrahimian
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background. Moderate-to-severe pain is reported in up to 75% of the patients in the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery. Evidence suggests that distraction is an effective nursing intervention for controlling short-term and transient pain. Distraction can be achieved by various techniques, including progressive muscle relaxation, meditation, and rhythmic breathing (RB). The present research aimed at evaluating the impacts of RB on the severity of sternotomy pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Methods. This randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients after CABG surgery at the open-heart surgery Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Kowsar Hospital, affiliated to Semnan University of Medical Sciences in Semnan, Iran. The patients were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups, including (1) intervention or RB and (2) control groups. RB was performed in the intervention group every 12 hours (9 a.m. and 9 p.m.) for three consecutive days after the surgery. The control group received only routine care for pain control (opioid analgesics) with no additional interventions. The severity of pain was measured every day in both groups of patients before and after the interventions using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results. The mean postintervention pain scores were significantly different from the mean preintervention scores in the intervention group ( p  < 0.05). The changes in the mean pain score in the intervention group were also significantly different from the corresponding changes in the controls ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion. Based on the results, the severity of pain after the intervention was significantly lower in the RB group compared to the control. RB was found to be an effective technique for reducing the patients’ pain and is therefore recommended as a post-CABG pain control technique. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: this trial is clinically registered with IRCT20120109008665N7, registered 3 September 2018.

scholarly journals Effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health of periodontally compromised patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenu Gehlot ◽  
Rekha Sharma ◽  
Shikha Tewari ◽  
Davender Kumar ◽  
Ambika Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Periodontal Health ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on periodontal parameters in periodontally compromised adult orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Thirty-six periodontally compromised adult patients (mean age: 29.67 ± 4.8 years) were randomly allocated to either test (perio-ortho) or control group (perio). After periodontal stabilization in both groups, orthodontic treatment was started in the test group, whereas the control group remained on periodontal maintenance only. Evaluation and comparison of clinical parameters (plaque index [PI]; gingival index [GI]; bleeding on probing [BOP]; probing depth [PD]; clinical attachment level [CAL]) of both groups was assessed at three time intervals: T0 (base line), T1 (at start of orthodontic treatment), and T2 (1 year after start of orthodontic treatment). Radiological parameters (alveolar bone levels [ABL]) were recorded using CBCT at T1 and T2. Results Intragroup analysis showed statistically significant improvement in all clinical and radiological periodontal parameters in both groups (P ≤ .05). Intergroup comparison revealed improvement in the periodontal parameters was not statistically significant between the groups (P ≥ .05). Subgroup analysis showed reduction in the number of moderate and severe periodontitis sites in both groups with significant more gains in ABL in the test group compared to the control group. Conclusions Orthodontic treatment after periodontal stabilization does not have any detrimental effect on periodontal health in adult periodontally compromised orthodontic patients and may add to the benefits achieved by periodontal treatment alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document