Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Great Saphenous Vein

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hiroko Kume ◽  
Shoji Sato ◽  
Satoko Fujita ◽  
Tomoko Kagayama ◽  
Takehisa Iwai
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy

scholarly journals LEV 3. Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Catheter-Directed Foam Sclerotherapy With or Without Perivenous Tumescent Enhancement in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. e127
Author(s):  
Pharawee Prayoonhong ◽  
Suthas Horsirimanont ◽  
Wiwat Tirapanich ◽  
Sopon Jirasiritum ◽  
Surasak Leela-Udomlipi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Vein Reflux

Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chapman-Smith ◽  
A Browne
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Over Time

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, safety and rate of recurrence for varicose veins associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). Methods A five-year prospective study was performed, recording the effect on the GSV and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameters, and reflux in the superficial venous system over time. UGFS was the sole treatment modality used in all cases, and repeat UGFS was performed where indicated following serial annual ultrasound. Results No serious adverse outcomes were observed – specifically no thromboembolism, arterial injection, anaphylaxis or nerve damage. There was a 4% clinical recurrence rate after five years, with 100% patient acceptance of success. Serial annual duplex ultrasound demonstrated a significant reduction in GSV and SFJ diameters, maintained over time. There was ultrasound recurrence in 27% at 12 months, and in 64% at five years, including any incompetent trunkal or tributary reflux even 1 mm in diameter being recorded. Thirty percent had pure ultrasound recurrence, 17% new vessel reflux and 17% combined new and recurrent vessels on ultrasound. Of all, 16.5% required repeat UGFS treatment between 12 and 24 months, but less than 10% in subsequent years. The safety and clinical efficacy of UGFS for all clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements classes of GSV reflux was excellent. Conclusion The popularity of this outpatient technique with patients reflects ease of treatment, lower cost, lack of downtime and elimination of venous signs and symptoms. Patients accept that UGFS can be repeated readily if required for recurrence in this common chronic condition. The subclinical ultrasound evidence of recanalization or new vein incompetence needs to be considered in this light.

Cost-utility analysis of great saphenous vein ablation with radiofrequency, foam and surgery in the emerging health-care setting of Thailand

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boonying Siribumrungwong ◽  
Pinit Noorit ◽  
Chumpon Wilasrusmee ◽  
Pattara Leelahavarong ◽  
Ammarin Thakkinstian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
One Year ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Objectives To conduct economic evaluations of radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and surgery for great saphenous vein ablation. Method A cost-utility and cohort analysis from societal perspective was performed to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Transitional probabilities were from meta-analysis. Direct medical, direct non-medical, indirect costs, and utility were from standard Thai costings and cohort. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess parameter uncertainties. Results Seventy-seven patients (31 radiofrequency ablation, 19 ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and 27 surgeries) were enrolled from October 2011 to February 2013. Compared with surgery, radiofrequency ablation costed 12,935 and 20,872 Baht higher, whereas ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy costed 6159 lower and 1558 Bath higher for outpatient and inpatient, respectively. At one year, radiofrequency ablation had slightly lower quality-adjusted life-year, whereas ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy yielded additional 0.025 quality-adjusted life-year gained. Because of costing lower and greater quality-adjusted life-year than other compared alternatives, outpatient ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy was an option being dominant. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted that at the Thai ceiling threshold of 160,000 Baht/quality-adjusted life-year gained, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy had chances of 0.71 to be cost-effective. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy seems to be cost-effective for treating great saphenous vein reflux compared to surgery in Thailand at one-year results.

Ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy can be safely applied for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins in elderly patients

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-603
Author(s):  
Nail Kahraman ◽  
Kadir K Özsin
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Visual Analog Score ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Occlusion Rate

Objectives Although many published series have shown the results of ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy, little is known about the outcomes and complications in older patients. Methods A total of 152 patients older than 65 years (group 1: 61.8% male, mean age 69.0 ± 4.5 years) and 244 patients younger than 65 years (group 2: 48.8% male, mean age 45.7 ± 11.2 years) were included in the study. Ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy was performed in patients with great saphenous vein valvular incompetence and saphenofemoral junction incompetence. Occlusion status was recorded by ultrasonography. Venous clinical severity score and visual analog score were calculated pre- and post-intervention. Results Complete occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein at 12 months post-procedure for the groups 1 and 2 was 86.4% and 86.3%, respectively. Venous clinical severity score and visual analog score were significantly different before ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy and four weeks after ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy ( p < 0.001) in both the groups. There were no observed major complications in both the groups. Conclusions With low complication rate and acceptable total occlusion rate, ultrasound-guided catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy can be considered a reliable treatment for older patients.

Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Balint ◽  
Akos Farics ◽  
Krisztina Parti ◽  
Laszlo Vizsy ◽  
Jozsef Batorfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation

Objective The aim of this review article was to evaluate the long-term technical success rates of the known endovenous ablation procedures in the treatment of the incompetence of the great saphenous vein. Methods A literature search was conducted in the PubMed-database until the 5 January 2016. All publications with four to five years follow-up were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed by the IVhet-model. Results Eight hundred and sixty-two unique publications were found; 17 of them were appropriate for meta-analysis. Overall, 1420 limbs were included in the trial, 939 for endovenous laser ablation, 353 for radiofrequency ablation and 128 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. Overall, technical success rates were 84.8% for endovenous laser ablation, 88.7% for radiofrequency ablation and 32.8% for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. There were no significant differences between endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy regarding the great saphenous vein reopening ( p = 0.66; OR: 0.22; 95% of CI: 0.08–0.62 for radiofrequency ablation vs. endovenous laser ablation; p = 0.96; OR: 0.11; 95% of CI: 0.06–0.20 for endovenous laser ablation vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy; p = 0.93; OR: 3.20; 95% of CI: 0.54–18.90 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation). Conclusion Both endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are efficient in great saphenous vein occlusion on the long term. Lacking long-conducted large trials, the efficacy and reliability of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy to treat great saphenous vein-reflux is not affirmed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document