EVALUATING USER EXPERIENCE WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. [21 p.]-[21 p.]
Author(s):  
AINHOA APRAIZ IRIARTE ◽  
GANIX LASA ERLE ◽  
MAITANE MAZMELA ETXABE
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Human Error ◽  
Physiological Monitoring ◽  
Human Machine Interaction ◽  
Skin Response ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Optimal Approach

ABSTRACT: User Experience (UX) is a key factor and an opportunity for improvement in digital interfaces. Traditionally, it has been evaluated retrospectively through surveys and interviews. However, this is not always the optimal approach, as it does not measure UX at the moment of human-machine interaction and is therefore prone to human error due to inaccurate recall. Thus, physiological monitoring is emerging as a promising technique to assess UX during interactions. This paper aims to identify UX case studies carried out with physiological monitoring by means of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The results of the 33 UX case studies reviewed show that interest in incorporating physiological technologies in UX studies is growing and expanding into different fields. The electroencephalogram (EEG) was found to be the most used physiological tool, and the most used set of tools was the Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) with the electrocardiogram (ECG). In addition, the average number of participants was obtained depending on the physiological tool used. The research opportunities identified are: 1) the combination of different methods and tools in the assessment of UX, and 2), the validation of a sample size for UX tests performed with physiological monitoring Keywords: User Experience (UX), evaluation, Systematic Literature Review (SLR), physiological monitorization

PRESENT AND FUTURE OF PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING TO EVALUATE USER EXPERIENCE

10.6036/10218 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-342
Author(s):  
AINHOA APRAIZ IRIARTE ◽  
GANIX LASA ERLE ◽  
MAITANE MAZMELA ETXABE
Keyword(s):  
User Experience ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Physiological Monitoring ◽  
Digital Products ◽  
Human Machine Interaction ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Optimal Approach ◽  
Machine Interaction

User Experience (UX) is a key factor and an opportunity for improvement in digital products. Traditionally, it has been evaluated retrospectively through surveys and interviews. However, retrospective and subjective evaluation is not in all cases the optimal approach, as it does not evaluate the UX at the time of human-machine interaction, and therefore may not project reality due to inaccurate recall.

scholarly journals Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review

Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Díaz-Oreiro ◽  
López ◽  
Quesada ◽  
Guerrero
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Different Characteristics ◽  
Geographical Context

Standardized questionnaires are one of the methods used to evaluate User Experience (UX). Standardized questionnaires are composed of an invariable group of questions that users answer themselves after using a product or system. They are considered reliable and economical to apply. The standardized questionnaires most recognized for UX evaluation are AttrakDiff, UEQ, and meCUE. Although the structure, format, and content of each of the questionnaires are known in detail, there is no systematic literature review (SLR) that categorizes the uses of these questionnaires in primary studies. This SLR presents the eligibility protocol and the results obtained by reviewing 946 papers from four digital databases, of which 553 primary studies were analyzed in detail. Different characteristics of use were obtained, such as which questionnaire is used more extensively, in which geographical context, and the size of the sample used in each study, among others.

Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 618-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Kitchenham ◽  
Pearl Brereton ◽  
Mark Turner ◽  
Mahmood K. Niazi ◽  
Stephen Linkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Participant Observer

scholarly journals Unveiling the Evolution of Innovation Ecosystems: An Analysis of Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Model Innovation Systems in European Case-studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rallou Taratori ◽  
Paulina RODRIGUEZ Fiscal ◽  
Marie Abigail Pacho ◽  
Sesil Koutra ◽  
Montserrat Pareja-Eastaway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
City Planning ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Rapid Urbanization ◽  
Governance Model ◽  
Modern Cities ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Key Factor

Despite the rising interest in smart city initiatives worldwide, governmental theories along with the managerial perspectives of city planning are a great lack in the literature. It is definitely understandable that the adoption of configurational pathways towards the ‘smart’ ‘governance’ models is required as key factor and smartness’ facilitator in modern cities. In this manuscript, we display an exhaustive analysis on the importance of the n-Helix models along with a benchmarking critical approach through selected European case-studies. The study, through the literature review, revealed the lack of exhaustive analyses for the methodological investigation, identification and adoption of the most appropriate governance model and collaborative approaches per project and collaborative approaches and create modular frameworks to address efficiently the continuous urban challenges, such as the rapid urbanization or the climate change.

scholarly journals Literature review of locomotion techniques in virtual reality

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heni Cherni ◽  
Natacha Métayer ◽  
Nicolas Souliman
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Virtual Environment ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Wide Range

This study represents a systematic literature review in which we explored the locomotion techniques in virtual reality between 2012 and 2019. We analysed and compared 22 locomotion methods that we have identified in 26 papers included in our review. The objective is to better understand relevant locomotion techniques and their impact on the user experience. The review of the literature has shown a wide range of different locomotion techniques which each technique is characterized by different advantages and drawbacks, but classic locomotion techniques such as joystick outperformed all the proposed technique in the reviewed studies. We also proposed a taxonomy and two types of evaluation for locomotion techniques in virtual environment. These elements provide guidelines that may help researchers to choose the most adapted locomotion technique according to the aim of their study.

Development of a human error taxonomy for software requirements: A systematic literature review

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 112-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Anu ◽  
Wenhua Hu ◽  
Jeffrey C Carver ◽  
Gursimran S Walia ◽  
Gary Bradshaw
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Human Error ◽  
Software Requirements ◽  
Error Taxonomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document