scholarly journals La virtud de la prudencia como herramienta que contribuye a una buena argumentación y a la praxis del mediador

Author(s):  
Karla Sáenz López ◽  
Elsa Zurita

Este articulo propone una comprensión de la prudencia, que aporta a la mediación transformativa herramientas éticas, intelectuales y morales. Por tal motivo, se considera necesario conocer cuáles son los elementos que componen su discurso autorregulado y argumentativo, considerando, las emociones, la lógica y la ética, poniendo especial énfasis en la participación del mediador/a, y la necesidad de orientar el conocimiento, teórico, técnico y reglamentario, hacia una práctica con altos principios; porque esto influye directamente en las partes intervinientes y en los procesos, y finalmente como conclusión, la incidencia de su aplicación en el desarrollo que mejora la práctica del mediador/a. This article proposes an understanding of prudence that contributes ethical, intellectual and moral tools to transformative mediation, for this reason, it is considered necessary to know are the elements that make up its self-regulated and argumentative discourse, considering emotions, logic and ethics , placing special emphasis on the participation of the mediator, and the need to orient the knowledge, theoretical, technical and regulatory, towards a practice with high principles; because this directly influences the intervening parties and the processes, and finally, as a conclusion, the incidence of its application in the development that improves the practice of the mediator.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-438
Author(s):  
Ting Wu

AbstractThe development of new media enlarges the repertoire of semantic resources in creating a discourse. Apart from language, visual and sound symbols can all become semantic sources, and a synergy of different modality and symbols can be used to complete argumentative reasoning and evaluation. In the framework of multimodal argumentation and appraisal theory, this study conducted quantitative and multimodal discourse analysis on a new media discourse Building a community of shared future for humankind and found that visual symbols can independently fulfill both reasoning and evaluation in the argumentative discourse. An interplay of multiple modalities constructs a multi-layered semantic source, with verbal subtitles as a frame and a sound system designed to reinforce the theme and mood. In addition, visual modality is implicit in constructing the stance and evaluation of the discourse, with the verbal mode playing the role of “anchoring,” i.e. providing explicit explanation. A synergy of visual, acoustic, and verbal modalities could effectively transmit conceptual, interpersonal, and discursive meanings, but the persuasive result with the audience from different cultural backgrounds might be mixed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. BII.S11572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tudor Groza ◽  
Hamed Hassanzadeh ◽  
Jane Hunter

Today's search engines and digital libraries offer little or no support for discovering those scientific artifacts (hypotheses, supporting/contradicting statements, or findings) that form the core of scientific written communication. Consequently, we currently have no means of identifying central themes within a domain or to detect gaps between accepted knowledge and newly emerging knowledge as a means for tracking the evolution of hypotheses from incipient phases to maturity or decline. We present a hybrid Machine Learning approach using an ensemble of four classifiers, for recognizing scientific artifacts (ie, hypotheses, background, motivation, objectives, and findings) within biomedical research publications, as a precursory step to the general goal of automatically creating argumentative discourse networks that span across multiple publications. The performance achieved by the classifiers ranges from 15.30% to 78.39%, subject to the target class. The set of features used for classification has led to promising results. Furthermore, their use strictly in a local, publication scope, ie, without aggregating corpus-wide statistics, increases the versatility of the ensemble of classifiers and enables its direct applicability without the necessity of re-training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Andrea Gallinucci-Martinez

<p align="JUSTIFY">Section A of this paper discusses the historical evolution of clinical legal programs in the United States, the homeland of clinical legal education. Next, the current framework of Italian legal clinics is discussed, focusing on its American heritage and associated nuances.</p><p>Section B considers why mediation would be particularly suitable for the creation of an Italian legal clinic, given the recent incentives created by the European legislature to strengthen alternative dispute resolution. The evolution of the Columbia Law School Mediation Clinic is described, from its beginning to the recent creation of an advanced clinic model, and insights from this process are discussed in terms of the Italian legal and family environment.</p><p>Section C lays out baseline considerations and recommendations for creating a family mediation clinic at LUMSA. Three different approaches to family and community mediation previously adopted in the context of clinical legal education are analysed: facilitative mediation, transformative mediation, and peacemaking circle. A model for the clinic is proposed, with suggestions for sources and materials from which the curriculum might be drawn.</p>


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debanjan Ghosh ◽  
Smaranda Muresan ◽  
Nina Wacholder ◽  
Mark Aakhus ◽  
Matthew Mitsui

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document