scholarly journals El narrador del Carmen Paschale en el relato de la muerte y resurrección de Jesús.

2021 ◽  
pp. 159-173
Author(s):  
Mª Dolores Hernández Mayor

In the Paschale Carmen the storyteller’s irruptions are frequent from the beginning of the book first, as shown in the metric prologue and in abundant loci of programmatic sense. The interventions of the narrator’s voice take on a different tone in the last book, dedicated to the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus. It’s shows that the program of the entire poem reaches its culmination in the faithful defense that the devout narrator makes of Christian doctrine against the lack of faith of the Jewish people. In this work we analyze some moments of the fifth book of Paschale Carmen in which this dogmatic intention of the narrator is evident, apart from his role as narrator of the miracles. En el Carmen Paschale las irrupciones del narrador son frecuentes desde el inicio del libro primero, como se demuestra en el prólogo métrico y en abundantes loci de sentido programático. Las intervenciones de la voz del narrador cobran un tono diferente en el último libro, dedicado a la Pasión y Resurrección de Jesús. En él se comprueba que el programa de todo el poema alcanza su culminación en la fiel defensa que el devoto narrador realiza de la doctrina cristiana frente a la falta de fe del pueblo judío. En este trabajo se analizan algunos momentos del libro quinto del Carmen Paschale en los que queda patente esa intención dogmática del narrador, al margen de su papel como relator de milagros.

AJS Review ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-250
Author(s):  
David Malkiel

Ghettoization stimulated sixteenth-century Italian Jewry to develop larger and more complex political structures, because the Jewish community now became responsible for municipal tasks. This development, however, raised theological objections in Catholic circles because Christian doctrine traditionally forbade the Jewish people dominion. It also aroused hostility among the increasingly centralized governments of early modern Europe, who viewed Jewish self-government as an infringement of the sovereignty of the state. The earliest appearance of the term “state within a state,” which has become a shorthand expression for the latter view, was recently located in Venice in 1631.


Pro Ecclesia ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 106385122095382
Author(s):  
Jennifer M Rosner

In the ongoing endeavor to increasingly recast traditional Christian theology in non-supersessionist terms, recent books by Mark S. Kinzer and Edjan Westerman deserve particular attention. Both authors lucidly illustrate the way in which the gospel of Jesus is intimately bound to the life and destiny of the Jewish people and the land of Israel. From different vantage points, these authors pose a set of key questions to the contemporary church by reframing central aspects of Christian doctrine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gäb

When we were on the subway back from his lecture, I said to Robin: “I’m not sure there actually are any religious fictionalists.” We keep talking about them in papers and lectures, acting as if fictionalism in religion is a real possibility, but to be honest, I haven’t been able to spot one in the wild so far. The only potential candidate who comes to mind is Don Cupitt, who wrote things like: “I still pray and love God, even though I fully acknowledge that no God actually exists.”[1] Perhaps this is as fictionalist as it gets. But then again, Cupitt never explicitly declared himself a fictionalist (at least to my knowledge). Moreover, on other occasions he sounds more like an expressivist than a fictionalist, e.g. when he says: “The Christian doctrine of God just is Christian spirituality in coded form.”[2] So, if there are any actual fictionalists out there, please step forward.[1] Don Cupitt, After God: The Future of Religion (Basic Books, 1997), 85.[2] Don Cupitt, Taking leave of God (SCM Press, 1980), 14.


Author(s):  
Jill Hicks-Keeton

The Introduction claims that the ancient romance Joseph and Aseneth moves a minor character in Genesis from obscurity to renown, weaving a new story whose main purpose was to intervene in ancient Jewish debates surrounding gentile access to Israel’s God. Aseneth’s story is a tale of the heroine’s transformation from exclusion to inclusion. It is simultaneously a transformative tale. For Second Temple-period thinkers, the epic of the Jewish people recounted in scriptural texts was a story that invited interpretation, interruption, and even intervention. Joseph and Aseneth participates in a broader literary phenomenon in Jewish antiquity wherein authors took up figures from Israel’s mythic past and crafted new stories as a means of explaining their own present and of envisioning collective futures. By incorporating a gentile woman and magnifying Aseneth’s role in Jewish history, Joseph and Aseneth changes the story. Aseneth’s ultimate inclusion makes possible the inclusion of others originally excluded.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document