QIM20-119: The Efficacy of Cost-Effective Fixed Dose of Rasburicase Compared to Weight-Based Dose in Treatment and Prevention of Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3.5) ◽  
pp. QIM20-119
Author(s):  
Ahmad M. Abu-Hashyeh ◽  
Mena Shenouda ◽  
Mohamed Al-Sharedi
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18558-e18558
Author(s):  
Bharadwaj Ponnada ◽  
Saadvik Raghuram ◽  
Sanketh Kotne ◽  
Pavithran Keechilat

e18558 Background: Rasburicase is a recombinant urate oxidase drug approved by the US FDA for the management of hyperuricemia in Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS). Recommended dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day for 5 days is expensive and the benefit of extended schedule compared to a single fixed dose of 1.5 mg is not known. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study done at a tertiary medical center including 165 (144 adult and 21 pediatrics) patients admitted between January 2013 and December 2018. We analyzed the efficacy of single low dose rasburicase 1.5 mg irrespective of bodyweight in adults and in children a dose of 0.15 mg/kg (maximum 1.5 mg) intravenously over 30 min for prevention and treatment of TLS and subsequent doses were given based on clinical and biochemical response. Plasma samples for uric acid were collected at baseline, 6–24 hrs, 48 hrs post-rasburicase, and daily during treatment. The primary outcome was achieving a uric acid level less than 7.0 mg/dl after a single dose of rasburicase in the groups. Secondary outcomes included need for repeat rasburicase doses, and a cost analysis. Results: Children accounted for 12.1% (n = 20) and adults 87.9% (n = 145). The median ages in pediatric and adult groups were 7.9 years and 54 years respectively. Rasburicase was used prophylactically in 35 (21.2%), for laboratory TLS in 105 (63.6%) and for clinical TLS in 25 (15.2%) patients. SDR prevented laboratory/clinical TLS in 89% of the prophylactic group and prevented clinical TLS in 72% of the laboratory TLS group. However, 92%(n=23) of the patients with clinical TLS required more than one dose rasburicase. The average total monthly cost of rasburicase was reduced by 96% ($2850 to $114) after adoption of the above protocol. Conclusions: Single low dose rasburicase is a highly economical and clinically effective way of managing patients with TLS and could serve as an alternative to the 5-day treatment. This dose, therefore, balances cost and efficacy of treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e178-e186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal K. Patel ◽  
Timothy J. Brown ◽  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Taylor Roberts ◽  
Eileen Marley ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Rasburicase is a recommended treatment of tumor lysis syndrome and patients at high-risk for developing tumor lysis syndrome. Unfortunately, it is expensive, and unnecessary use raises costs of care. METHODS: Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology was used to decrease the inappropriate use of rasburicase. In the Plan phase, a multidisciplinary quality improvement team reviewed the rasburicase ordering process and its prescription patterns at Parkland Health and Hospital System between October 2015 and September 2017 to determine appropriate interventions for improvement. In the Do phase, interventions were deployed to improve rasburicase prescriptions. In the Study phase, the team reviewed the rasburicase orders and appropriateness from February 2018 to October 2018. During the Act phase, the interventions were found to be successful, and the process changes were solidified. RESULTS: At baseline, 65 doses of rasburicase were administered during the 2-year baseline period, 21 of these (32.3%) were inappropriate. Review of the ordering process identified pitfalls: one-click ready-to-sign order, fixed default dose, no hard-stop alert requiring physicians to review and confirm appropriate indications, and lack of secondary pharmacy review. We aimed to reduce the percentage of inappropriate rasburicase orders from a baseline of 32.3% to 10% over 3 months. In February 2018, we implemented the interventions, which resulted in reduction in inappropriate rasburicase use, with only a single inappropriate order placed in 7 months postintervention. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach and classic quality improvement methodology enabled us to reduce inappropriate rasburicase use. Straightforward electronic medical record interventions and secondary pharmacy review are effective in addressing overuse.


2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1529-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh N Vines ◽  
Carl B Shanholtz ◽  
Jennifer L Thompson

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3175-3175
Author(s):  
Mitchell S. Cairo ◽  
Stephen Thompson ◽  
Krishna Tangirala ◽  
Michael T. Eaddy

Abstract Abstract 3175 Background: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency resulting in several metabolic abnormalities (Cairo et al, BJH, 2004). Hyperuricemia and its associated complications are the most frequent manifestations of TLS. For decades, treatment has consisted of hydration, urine alkalinization, and administration of allopurinol (Cairo et al BJH, 2011). However, recent clinical trials have shown that initiation of rasburicase, a hypouricemic agent, within four hours significantly reduces high uric acid (UA) levels in patients experiencing TLS (Goldman et al Blood, 2001). Studies demonstrate that rasburicase is safe and effective, has excellent tolerability, and is potentially cost-effective in patients at high risk for TLS. Objective: The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate real-world differences in UA levels, length of stay and costs for patients initiating treatment with rasburicase compared to patients receiving allopurinol. Methods: A retrospective study, spanning January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2009, was conducted utilizing administrative data from more than 400 U.S. hospitals. Hospitalized patients with clinically confirmed TLS, who received rasburicase or allopurinol during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients with a diagnosis of gout, as determined by the presence of an ICD-9 diagnosis code 274.x, were excluded from the study. Patients receiving rasburicase were propensity score matched to allopurinol-treated patients in a 1:4 ratio based on time between hospital admission and treatment initiation, baseline UA level, cancer type, age, gender, race, hospital characteristics, payer type, and prior intensive-care unit (ICU) admission. Differences in length of stay (LOS), changes in UA levels and serum creatinine, days in the ICU, and costs per percent of UA reduction were assessed through various statistical models. Due to a high level of missing cancer diagnosis, comparative results of rasburicase and allopurinol were also evaluated through sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 130 patients were identified, matched and included in this study; 26 initiated treatment with rasburicase and 104 were treated with allopurinol. Patients were predominately male (∼61%) Caucasian (∼76%) with an average age of 55 years. There were no statistically significant differences among baseline variables between the two cohorts. Prior to initiating treatment, mean UA levels were 11.4 mg/dL for the rasburicase cohort and 11.2 mg/dL for allopurinol cohort. By the second day of treatment mean UA levels were 5.3 mg/dL (p<0.0001) lower for rasburicase (2.7mg/dL) compared to allopurinol (8.0 mg/dL). Changes in potassium, phosphorus and creatinine levels were not statistically different across the two cohorts. The LOS for patients in the rasburicase cohort averaged 11.5 days compared to 16.5 days for allopurinol patients (p=0.0212); rasburicase patients also had a lower ICU LOS, 1.4 and 3.9 days, respectively (p<0.0001). The reduction in LOS correlated with a reduction in costs, which averaged $34,065 per rasburicase patient compared to $54,103 per allopurinol patient (p=0.0205). Results of the sensitivity analyses did not change the overall findings. Conclusions: This retrospective study, using hospital administrative data, revealed that treatment with rasburicase, compared with allopurinol, was associated with a significant reduction in UA levels, ICU LOS, overall LOS and overall costs per patient. Despite the increase pharmaceutical costs of rasburicase versus allopurinol, the use of rasburicase in patients with TLS is cost effective and reduces LOS. Disclosures: Cairo: sanofi aventis: Consultancy. Thompson:sanofi aventis: Employment. Tangirala:sanofi aventis: Employment. Eaddy:Xcenda: Employment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110211
Author(s):  
Shahrier Hossain ◽  
Martha Naber ◽  
Matthew J Yacobucci

Introduction Tumor lysis syndrome is an oncologic emergency characterized by hyperuricemia. Previous studies have demonstrated that a fixed-dose strategy of rasburicase is as effective as the FDA approved weight-based dose. Albany Medical Center employs rasburicase 1.5 mg in patients with a uric acid (UA) between 8 and 12 mg/dL and 3 mg for UA above12 mg/dL.We aimed to evaluate the UA lowering effectiveness and provider adherence to the institutional protocol, as well as the cost-efficiency of this dosing strategy. Methods This is a single center, retrospective, cohort study. The electronic medical record was used to identify patients receiving rasburicase and to collect baseline demographic and laboratory data. The fixed-dose strategies of rasburicase 1.5 mg and 3 mg were compared in their degree of UA reduction and clinical outcomes. Cost-savings of fixed-dosing was compared to the FDA-approved weight-based dose. Results Mean UA reduction in the 1.5 mg group (n = 49) from baseline to 24 hours was 2.88 ± 0.88 mg/dL (p < 0.0001) and 4.83 ± 1.39 mg/dL (p < 0.0001) in the 3 mg group (n = 105). A subgroup analysis of patients who received per protocol initial doses of rasburicase showed a mean reduction in UA from baseline to 24 hours of 2.83 ± 0.62 mg/dL in the 1.5 mg group (n = 42) and 6.12 ± 1.87 mg/dL in the 3 mg group (n = 42). Using a low fixed-dose approach resulted in a cost-savings of $138,077.30 annually. Conclusion Low fixed-dose rasburicase was an effective treatment, with a dose of 1.5 mg being sufficient to reach a goal UA of less than 8 mg/dL for serum UA levels below 12 mg/dL, while a 3 mg dose is appropriate for levels above 12 mg/dL. Cost analysis indicates this strategy is more cost-efficient than the FDA-approved weight-based dose.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kajal S Patel ◽  
Jessica E Lau ◽  
Anthony S Zembillas ◽  
Erika M Gallagher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document