scholarly journals Equity in Cancer Care: Pathways, Protocols, and Guidelines

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S-1-S-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K. DeMartino ◽  
Jonathan K. Larsen

The quality of patient care varies based on numerous factors, such as health care setting, geographic location, access to medications, insurance coverage, and treatment protocols. Recently, the issue of whether use of clinical pathways can reduce costs and inappropriate variability in care has been the subject of much debate. As clinical treatment guidelines and pathways are increasingly deployed in oncology practice, they have a growing impact on the quality of treatment and how it is delivered. To fulfill the current need to discuss the use of pathways and clinical treatment guidelines in oncology and to address how patient care is impacted by their use, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network convened the NCCN Oncology Policy Summit: Equity in Cancer Care–Pathways, Protocols, and Guidelines. The summit was a forum to discuss the use and implementation of pathways, including how much flexibility pathways should allow in care, pathways’ impact on public and private health insurance benefit design, what data is used to select pathway regimens and protocols, and ultimately what impact pathways may have on variation in care. The use and implementation of clinical treatment guidelines in practice was also explored from a variety of perspectives.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320
Author(s):  
Jennifer Trageser ◽  
Max Rush ◽  
Hk Kahng ◽  
Rowena Schwartz ◽  
Roy A. Beveridge ◽  
...  

320 Background: Technological advancements allow community oncologists to improve quality of patient care. By offering online access to treatment protocols, colleague collaboration, and clinical resources in a centralized environment, practices may realize efficiencies that can translate to better patient care. Methods: We characterized development and ongoing enhancements of The Oncology Portal from Dec 2010 to April 2012, provided to >1,000 physicians. Characterization is qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative characteristics of functionality enhancements accommodated clinical communication and educational content. Quantitative analysis evaluated discussion notifications, content consumption clicks and discussion posts and comments. Results: The Portal leveraged evolving technology to implement incremental, strategic enhancements for medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, pharmacists, researchers, and mid-level providers. These enhancements provided the framework to drive practice efficiency and improve patient care by extending access to all practice clinicians. Initial enhancements included expanding discussion boards to include researchers and mid-level providers. Additional enhancements included mobile access to discussions, wiki, and two expert programs. Educational content was augmented to include evidence-based resources, including journals, drug information, conference coverage, treatment guidelines, disease-specific CME, and clinical trials. A respectable increase in utilization was observed, as shown in the Table. Conclusions: Portal enhancements and expanded content occurred gradually, utilization increased across the network over the study period, and interest in The Portal remains high. Utilization was likely facilitated by content enhancements improving practice quality and efficiency. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
pp. 260-263
Author(s):  
Monica Irukulla ◽  
Palwai Vinitha Reddy

AbstractOutcomes in cancer patients are strongly influenced by timeliness and quality of multidisciplinary interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to severe disruption in cancer care in many countries. This has necessitated several changes in clinical care and workflow, including resource allocation, team segregation and deferment of many elective procedures. Several international oncological societies have proposed guidelines for the care of patients afflicted with breast cancer during the pandemic with a view to optimize resource allocation and maximize risk versus benefit for the individual and society. Clinicians may utilize these recommendations to adapt patient care, based on the current availability of resources and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in each region. This article discusses the guidelines for care of patients afflicted with breast cancer during the pandemic.


2021 ◽  
pp. 787-799
Author(s):  
Nathan I. Cherny ◽  
Stein Kaasa

The division of cancer care into initial primary antitumour therapies followed by hospice or palliative care for patients who have progressive disease is anachronistic. Since the goals of medical oncology extend beyond the reduction of tumour burden and the deferral of death and incorporate a quality-of-life dimension, there is need for a continuum in patient care independent of whether the treatment intention is curative, life-prolonging, or symptomatic. Palliative care interventions should be integrated according to the clinical circumstances of the patient. This chapter outlines the oncologist’s role in the delivery of palliative care to cancer patients, emphasizing issues related to communication, interdisciplinary care, and collaborative practice with palliative medicine experts, and emphasizing principles of non-abandonment and continuity of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidelia Cascini ◽  
Federico Santaroni ◽  
Riccardo Lanzetti ◽  
Giovanna Failla ◽  
Andrea Gentili ◽  
...  

Objective: To improve the safety and quality of patient care in hospitals by shaping clinical pathways throughout the patient journey.Study Setting: A risk model designed for healthcare organizations in the context of the challenges arising from comorbidity and other treatment-related complexities.Study Design: The core of the model is the patient and his intra-hospital journey, which is analyzed using a data-driven approach. The structure of a predictive model to support organizational and clinical decision-making activities is explained. Data relating to each step of the intra-hospital journey (from hospital admission to discharge) are extracted from clinical records.Principal Findings: The proposed approach is feasible and can be used effectively to improve safety and quality. It enables the evaluation of clinical risks at each step of the patient journey.Conclusion: Based on data from real cases, the model can record and calculate, over time, variables and behaviors that affect the safety and quality of healthcare organizations. This provides a greater understanding of healthcare processes and their complexity which can, in turn, advance research relating to clinical pathways and improve strategies adopted by organizations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 100245
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Bergin ◽  
Kathryn Whitfield ◽  
Victoria White ◽  
Roger L. Milne ◽  
Jon D. Emery ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e296-e303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunita Mitera ◽  
Craig Earle ◽  
Steven Latosinsky ◽  
Christopher Booth ◽  
Andrea Bezjak ◽  
...  

Using knowledge translation and exchange efforts, this list should empower patients with cancer and physicians to participate in a targeted conversation about the appropriateness and quality of individual patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document