scholarly journals Management of Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Jacalyn Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Significant Progress ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
The Past ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Over Time

Despite significant progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) over the past decade, this disease remains incurable and almost all patients ultimately experience relapse and become refractory to treatment over time. However, the outlook for patients with relapsed MM has improved markedly with the use of the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Moreover, the development of new drug classes based on preclinical rationale and the introduction of next-generation agents is likely to further expand treatment options and improve outcomes for relapsed MM.

scholarly journals Novel Non-Immunologic Agents for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Review Article

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5210
Author(s):  
Arthur Bobin ◽  
Cécile Gruchet ◽  
Stéphanie Guidez ◽  
Hélène Gardeney ◽  
Laly Nsiala Makunza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Novel Treatments ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Drug Classes

Novel treatments are needed to address the lack of options for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Even though immunotherapy-based treatments have revolutionized the field in recent years, offering new opportunities for patients, there is still no curative therapy. Thus, non-immunologic agents, which have proven effective for decades, are still central to the treatment of multiple myeloma, especially for advanced disease. Building on their efficacy in myeloma, the development of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs has been pursued, and has led to the emergence of a novel generation of agents (e.g., carfilzomib, ixazomib, pomalidomide). The use of alkylating agents is decreasing in most treatment regimens, but melflufen, a peptide-conjugated alkylator with a completely new mechanism of action, offers interesting opportunities. Moreover, with the identification of novel targets, new drug classes have entered the myeloma armamentarium, such as XPO1 inhibitors (selinexor), HDAC inhibitors (panobinostat), and anti-BCL-2 agents (venetoclax). New pathways are still being explored, especially the possibility of a mutation-driven strategy, as biomarkers and targeted treatments are increasing. Though multiple myeloma is still considered incurable, the treatment options are expanding and are progressively becoming more diverse, largely because of the continuous development of non-immunologic agents.

Evolving Paradigms in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1186-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Antonio Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Past ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Novel Agent

The treatment of multiple myeloma has undergone significant changes in the past few years. The introduction of novel agents, such as the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, has dramatically improved the outcome of this disease and considerably increased the treatment options available. Several trials have shown the advantages linked to the use of novel agents both in young patients, who are considered eligible for transplantation, and elderly patients, for whom a conventional therapy should be considered. These novel agents may increase the efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation with deeper and long-lasting response. In the transplant setting, different novel agent combinations have proved to be superior to the traditional vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Similarly, novel agents have also changed the treatment paradigm of patients not eligible for transplantation, thus replacing the traditional melphalan-prednisone approach. Preliminary data also support the role of consolidation and maintenance therapy to further improve outcomes. This article provides an overview of the latest strategies, including novel agents used to treat patients with multiple myeloma, both in the transplant and nontransplant settings.

Real-world treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Clinical and economic outcomes in patients treated with pomalidomide or daratumumab

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
New Treatment

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.

Pomalidomide experience: an effective therapeutic approach with immunomodulatory drugs in a patient with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5s) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Concetta Conticello ◽  
Marina Parisi ◽  
Alessandra Romano ◽  
Valeria Calafiore ◽  
Flavia Ancora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Therapeutic Approach ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

scholarly journals Daratumumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5642-5642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
Neil Dunavin ◽  
Brian McClune ◽  
Leyla Shune ◽  
Ajoy L. Dias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background: Daratumumab triplet regimens containing dexamethasone and lenalidomide or bortezomib are an effective treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Daratumumab was recently FDA-approved in combination with the second-generation immunomodulatory drug, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone based (DPd) on results of the EQUULEUS study where overall response rates (ORR) of 60% were seen. The goal of this retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcomes of the DPd triplet regimen in either a daratumumab and pomalidomide naïve or refractory population of heavily pretreated RRMM patients at our institution. Methods: Thirty-two patients with RRMM treated with DPd at the University of Kansas Health System between November 2015 and July 2018 were included in our analysis. DPd consisted of 28-day cycles of daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously (weekly for cycles 1 and 2, every 2 weeks for cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression); pomalidomide 4 mg orally (PO)on Days 1-21 and adjusted for cytopenia or toxicities; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly adjusted based on tolerance. based on age. Responses were evaluated using IMWG criteria. Patient characteristics, disease course, and outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results:The median age was 64 years (range 44-83). Twenty-three patients (72%) had IgG isotype, 11 patients (34 %) had ISS stage III disease at diagnosis, 13 patients (41%) had high risk cytogenetics, and 13 patients (41%) had extramedullary disease. Median number of previous lines of therapy was 4 (1-9). Twenty-two patients (69%) received ≥3 prior therapies. Twenty-three patients (72%) were proteasome inhibitor refractory, 28 patients (88%) were immunomodulator refractory, 9 patients (28%) were daratumumab refractory, and 3 patients (15%) were double refractory to daratumumab and pomalidomide. Twenty-eight patients (88%) had received autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prior to DPd; 12 patients (38%) had ≥2 prior transplants. Median number of DPd cycles received was 6 (2-30) and the median duration of treatment was 5 months (2-30). At a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range: 2-29), the overall response rate (ORR) for all patients was 72% which compares favorably to the ORR of 60% in the EQUULEUS study. However, about half of the responses were partial responses (PR) (47%). The ORR rate for those who were refractory to either pomalidomide or daratumumab was 65%. The PFS was 8.3 months, while the median OS was not reached. Conclusion: DPd was recently approved for the treatment of RRMM. Our ORR compares favorably to the EQUULEUS study, however about half of responses were partial responses or better. Surprisingly, our analysis shows an impressive ORR in patients with previous exposure to proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory therapies in RRMM population, suggesting a benefit of DPd even in patients who received prior pomalidomide or daratumumab. Disclosures McGuirk: Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Other: speaker, Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expenses, speaker ; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ganguly:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Sickness Absence in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients in Sweden: Trends in a Changing Treatment Landscape

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Fredrik Borgsten ◽  
Xenia Gatopoulou ◽  
Marta Pisini ◽  
Magnus Tambour ◽  
Frida Schain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Productivity Loss ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Past ◽  
Over Time

Background In the last decades the introduction of novel drugs has greatly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We have investigated healthcare resource utilization and sickness absence-associated productivity loss over time in a population-wide, retrospective registry study in Sweden. Methods 8,693 patients were identified in the National Cancer Register with a MM diagnosis from July 2001 to December 2015 and followed until 2016. Specialized healthcare usage (inpatient admissions and outpatient visits) were obtained from the Patient Register and costs were estimated by weighted DRG codes. For patients under 66 years of age, sickness absence and salary information were obtained by linkage to the LISA Register. Analyses were performed separately on patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (n=1,425) and on non-transplanted patients (n=7,012) and stratified by diagnosis periods 2001-2005, 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 to reflect increased introduction of effective drugs into clinical care. Median age was 60 years in the ASCT group and 75 years in the non-ASCT group. Results The number of MM patients that underwent ASCT increased over time (n= 282 in 2001-2006 to n= 592 in 2011-2015). MM patients diagnosed most recently had improved overall survival (OS), with five-year OS rate increasing from 52% to 58% to 62% for patients diagnosed in 2001-2005, 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Patients diagnosed during 2011-2015 spent on average 20% and 9% less total time in specialized healthcare than patients diagnosed during 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, respectively (adjusting for sex, age at ASCT, weighted comorbidity score at ASCT and per follow-up year and education at ASCT). This decrease was driven by less usage and time in both inpatient and outpatient care. Adjusted sickness absence time decreased by 41% and 38% in the third follow-up year for patients diagnosed during 2011-2015 compared to patients diagnosed during 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, respectively. Productivity loss costs represented about 45% of total costs (healthcare resource costs ~55%) in the first two follow-up years, but decreased over time. The cumulative median per person cost (healthcare- and productivity-related) over the three follow-up years post-diagnosis decreased by 21% in 2011-2015 (€52,273) compared to 2001-2005 (€66,182), despite an 8% increase in three-year OS over the same period. The number of non-ASCT MM patients also increased over time (n=2,053 in 2001-2005 to n= 2,587 in 2011-2015). Median survival increased from 2.5 years to 3.4 years for patients diagnosed during 2001-2005 compared to 2011-2015. Average total time spent in specialized healthcare was reduced by 29% and 12% for patients diagnosed during 2011-2015, compared to patients diagnosed during 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, respectively (adjusting for sex, age at diagnosis, weighted CCS at diagnosis, weighted CCS per follow-up year and education at diagnosis). This was associated with decreased need for inpatient care and a shift towards more outpatient usage. By the third follow-up year, the adjusted sickness absence time in patients diagnosed during 2011-2015 was reduced by 44% and 23% compared to patients diagnosed in 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, respectively. Productivity loss accounted for approximately 15% of total costs (healthcare resource costs ~85%) and was stable over follow-up years. The cumulative median per-person cost (healthcare- and productivity-related) over three follow-up years was similar for patients diagnosed in 2001-2005 (€25,621) and 2011-2015 (€26,592), despite a 12% increase in three-year OS over the same period. Conclusion The availability of new treatment options for MM patients in Sweden over time was associated with less healthcare usage, less time spent in healthcare and lower productivity loss due to sickness absence for both ASCT and non-ASCT-treated patients. These improved clinical and economic outcomes provide policy makers, healthcare providers and physicians with invaluable real-world insights for cost-benefit considerations in the continued development and introduction of effective treatments for MM. Figure 1 Disclosures Borgsten: Janssen: Current Employment. Gatopoulou:Janssen: Current Employment. Pisini:Janssen: Current Employment. Tambour:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schain:Schain Research: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Jones:Schain Research: Current Employment. Kwok:Schain Research: Other: Internship . Hjortsberg:Janssen: Current Employment.

Treatment options in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus Rommer ◽  
Uwe K Zettl
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders ◽  
The Past ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Spectrum Disorders

: There are few diseases with as many therapeutic advances in recent years as in multiple sclerosis. Nine different drug classes with more than a dozen approved therapies are now available. Similarly, there have been unimaginable advances in understanding neuromyelitis optica (now neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder [NMOSD]) over the past 15 years. Building on the knowledge gained, the first therapies have been approved in recent years. In this review, we aim to present all therapies approved for the treatment of MS or NMOSD. The different forms of application, different approval criteria and most important side effects will be presented. This work is intended for physicians who are interested in MS and NMOSD therapies and want to get a first overview and does not replace the respective guidelines of the regulatory authorities.

Carfilzomib: A Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
American Society

OBJECTIVE To review and summarize data on carfilzomib, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2012 for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who received prior bortezomib and thalidomide or lenalidomide. DATA SOURCES A literature search through PubMed was conducted through October 2012 using the terms carfilzomib, PR-171, proteasome inhibitor (PI), and MM. Data were also obtained through the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology abstracts and FDA briefing documents. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION The literature search was limited to human studies published in English. Priority was placed on trials of carfilzomib in relapsed and refractory MM. DATA SYNTHESIS Carfilzomib is a new PI that differs in pharmacology and pharmacokinetics from bortezomib, the first-in-class PI. The FDA approval was based on efficacy data from a Phase 2 study of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and refractory MM (n = 266). All patients had received prior bortezomib and 80% were refractory or intolerant to both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Patients were treated with intravenous carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 (cycle 1) followed by 27 mg/m2 (cycles ≥2) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of each 28-day cycle. The overall response rate was 23.7% (18.7–29.4), with a median duration of response of 7.8 (5.6–9.2) months. Safety data from an integrated analysis reported thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea as the most common adverse events, with minimal dose-limiting neutropenia or peripheral neuropathy (PN) (n = 526). The incidence of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia was 24.9%, while that of neutropenia was 11.9%, and the incidence of all grades of treatment-emergent PN was 13%. CONCLUSIONS Carfilzomib is a safe and effective new treatment option for patients with relapsed MM refractory to bortezomib and thalidomide or lenalidomide. Randomized head-to-head trials with bortezomib will assist in formulary and treatment decisions in the context of PIs as a drug class.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document