Is Prophylactic Drainage After Pancreas Transplant Associated With Reduced Reoperation Rate?

Author(s):  
Naeem Goussous ◽  
David P. St. Michel ◽  
Heather Mcdade ◽  
Susanne Gaines ◽  
Amy Borth ◽  
...  
Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
DAMIAN MCNAMARA
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moira Cheung ◽  
Fiona Bartlett ◽  
Hilary Wyatt ◽  
Charles Buchanan ◽  
Ritika Kapoor

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
Mladen E. Ovcharov ◽  
Iliya V. Valkov ◽  
Milan N. Mladenovski ◽  
Nikolay V. Vasilev

Summary Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is the most common pathology in young people, as well as people of active age. Despite sophisticated and new minimally invasive surgical techniques and approaches, reoperations for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) could not be avoided. LDH recurrence rates, reported in different studies, range from 5 to 25%. The purpose of this study was to estimate the recurrence rates of LDH after standard discectomy (SD) and microdiscectomy (MD), and compare them to those reported in the literature. Retrospectively, operative reports for the period 2012-2017 were reviewed on LDH surgeries performed at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Dr Georgi Stranski University Hospital in Pleven. Five hundred eighty-nine single-level lumbar discectomies were performed by one neurosurgeon. The diagnoses of recurrent disc herniation were based on the development of new symptoms and magnetic resonance/computed tomography (MRI/CT) images showing compatible lesions in the same lumbar level as the primary lumbar discectomies. The recurrence rate was determined by using chi-square tests and directional measures. SD was the most common procedure (498 patients) followed by MD (91 patients). The cumulative reoperation rate for rLDH was 7.5%. From a total number of reoperations, 26 were males (59.1%) and 18 were females (40.9%). Reoperation rates were 7.6% and 6.6% after SD and MD respectively. The recurrence rate was not significantly higher for SD. Our recurrence rate was 7.5%, which makes it comparable with the rates of 5-25% reported in the literature.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Shi Huang ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
Shengfu Li ◽  
Dan Long ◽  
Xin Duan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumin Oh ◽  
E. Kyung Shin ◽  
Sowoon Hyun ◽  
Myung Jae Jeon

AbstractConcomitant apical suspension should be performed at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse to reduce the risk of recurrent prolapse. Native tissue repair (NTR) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are commonly used apical suspension procedures; however, it remains unclear which one is preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of NTR and SCP in terms of surgical failure, complication and reoperation rates. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. This retrospective cohort study included 523 patients who had undergone NTR (n = 272) or SCP (n = 251) along with hysterectomy for uterine prolapse and who had at least 4-month follow-up visits. During the median 3-year follow-up period, the surgical failure rate was higher in the NTR group (21.3% vs 6.4%, P < 0.01), with a low rate of retreatment in both groups. Overall complication rates were similar, but complications requiring surgical correction under anesthesia were more common in the SCP group (7.2% vs 0.4%, P < 0.01). As a result, the total reoperation rate was significantly higher in the SCP group (8.0% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02). Taken together, NTR may be a preferred option for apical suspension when hysterectomy is performed for uterine prolapse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
AH Innes ◽  
SJ Tingle ◽  
I Ibrahim ◽  
E Thompson ◽  
L Bates ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Dextran 40 (D40) is a synthetic colloid with anticoagulant properties, which is commonly used instead of heparin following pancreas transplantation, however there is a lack of evidence over which is more effective. Graft thrombosis and pancreatitis, which may be mediated through micro or macrothrombosis within the graft, remain significant complications following pancreas transplantation. We hypothesised that D40 reduces inflammation through its antithrombotic pro-microcirculatory effects. We aimed to evaluate D40 compared to a heparin-based protocol by comparing post-operative complications and post-transplant levels of inflammation. Method Data were collected retrospectively for pancreas transplant patients between December 2009 and August 2018 – 26 patients had been treated with the pre-Dextran protocol and 37 had received D40. Post-operative complications and inflammatory markers (WCC, CRP and amylase) on post-operative days 1, 2, 3 and 7 were compared between the two groups. Potential confounders were also recorded. Result Patients in the D40 group had similar thrombosis rates but were less likely to have had substantial post-operative bleeding compared to the heparin-based protocol. The group who received D40 had significantly lower CRP and WCC on days 2, 3 and 7. The differences on days 3 and 7 remained when the results were adjusted for the significant confounders - cold ischaemic time and donor age. Conclusion D40 appears to be as effective as IV heparin at preventing graft thrombosis following pancreas transplant, and to confer a reduced risk of bleeding. It may also reduce post-operative inflammatory processes, leading to reduced graft pancreatitis. Take-home message Using Dextran 40 as an anticoagulant after pancreas transplantation is as effective as IV heparin at preventing graft thromboses and has a reduced risk of bleeding.


Cartilage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194760352110115
Author(s):  
Jacob G. Calcei ◽  
Kunal Varshneya ◽  
Kyle R. Sochacki ◽  
Marc R. Safran ◽  
Geoffrey D. Abrams ◽  
...  

Objective The objective of this study is to compare the (1) reoperation rates, (2) 30-day complication rates, and (3) cost differences between patients undergoing isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) or osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) procedures alone versus patients with concomitant osteotomy. Study Design Retrospective cohort study, level III. Design Patients who underwent knee ACI (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 27412) or OCA (CPT 27415) with minimum 2-year follow-up were queried from a national insurance database. Resulting cohorts of patients that underwent ACI and OCA were then divided into patients who underwent isolated cartilage restoration procedure and patients who underwent concomitant osteotomy (CPT 27457, 27450, 27418). Reoperation was defined by ipsilateral knee procedure after the index surgery. The 30-day postoperative complication rates were assessed using ICD-9-CM codes. The cost per patient was calculated. Results A total of 1,113 patients (402 ACI, 67 ACI + osteotomy, 552 OCA, 92 OCA + osteotomy) were included (mean follow-up of 39.0 months). Reoperation rate was significantly higher after isolated ACI or OCA compared to ACI or OCA plus concomitant osteotomy (ACI 68.7% vs. ACI + osteotomy 23.9%; OCA 34.8% vs. OCA + osteotomy 16.3%). Overall complication rates were similar between isolated ACI (3.0%) and ACI + osteotomy (4.5%) groups and OCA (2.5%) and OCA + osteotomy (3.3%) groups. Payments were significantly higher in the osteotomy groups at day of surgery and 9 months compared to isolated ACI or OCA, but costs were similar by 2 years postoperatively. Conclusions Concomitant osteotomy at the time of index ACI or OCA procedure significantly reduces the risk of reoperation with a similar rate of complications and similar overall costs compared with isolated ACI or OCA.


HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S426
Author(s):  
M. Clapp ◽  
A. Parsikia ◽  
L. Weaver ◽  
J. Ortiz

2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110337
Author(s):  
Danielle Whiting ◽  
Branimir Penev ◽  
Katherine Guest ◽  
Mark Cynk

Objective: To describe the short and long-term complications of over 1000 cases of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a single centre. Methods: A prospective database of all HoLEP procedures performed between December 2003 and March 2017 was analysed. Results: A total of 1016 HoLEP procedures were performed. Median patient age was 72 years (range 41–95). There was a significant improvement in urinary flow, post-void residual volume, IPSS and QoL score ( p < 0.0001). Pre-operative acute urinary retention was present in 403 patients (39.7%). Post-operatively five patients (1.2%) continued with a long-term catheter. Early and late complications consisted of failed initial voiding trial (10.6%), stress incontinence (transient 6.5%; persistent 0.3%), frequency/dysuria (5.6%), urinary tract infection (5.3%), urethral stricture (4.8%), submeatal stenosis (1.9%), return to theatre (1.5%), bladder neck stenosis (1.3%), bleeding (1.2%), epididymitis (0.7%), confusion (0.3%), transurethral resection of the prostate conversion (0.2%), ureteric obstruction (0.2%), vomiting (0.2%), anuric renal failure (0.1%), chest infection (0.1%), chest pain (0.1%), myocardial infarction (0.1%), rectoprostatic fistula (0.1%), supraventricular tachycardia (0.1%) and urinary sepsis (0.1%). Five-year reoperation rate was 3.7%. Conclusion: HoLEP is a safe treatment for bladder outflow obstruction secondary to an enlarged prostate. It is associated with few early and late complications and has a low reoperation rate. Level of evidence: 4


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document