scholarly journals Objective photographic assessments and comparisons of immediate bilateral breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and implants

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-482
Author(s):  
Hyun Ho Han ◽  
Jin Mi Choi ◽  
Jin Sup Eom
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bilateral Mastectomy ◽  
Average Weight ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Bilateral Reconstruction

Background The increasing number of bilateral breast cancer patients has been accompanied by a growing need for bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. However, little research has investigated the complications and aesthetic outcomes related to bilateral reconstruction. Therefore, we analyzed retrospective data comparing the outcomes of bilateral reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps or implants.Methods This study included 52 patients (24 DIEP group and 28 implant group) who underwent bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and complications were recorded. The difference between the left and right position of the nipple-areolar complex with respect to the sternal notch point at the clavicle was measured, and breast symmetry was evaluated.Results The average weight of breasts reconstructed with DIEP flaps (417.43±152.50 g) was higher than that of breasts with implants. The hospitalization period and operation time were significantly longer in the DIEP group. Early complications were significantly more common in the implant group (36.53%) than in the DIEP group. The angles between the nipples and the horizontal line were 1.09°±0.71° and 1.75°±1.45° in the DIEP and implant groups, respectively.Conclusions Although the surgical burden is lower, breast reconstruction using implants requires greater attention with respect to implant positioning, asymmetry, and complications than DIEP flap reconstruction. DIEP flap reconstruction has a prolonged operation time and a high risk of flap failure, but yields excellent cosmetic results and does not require intensive follow-up. Patients should be consulted to determine the most suitable option for them.

The PAP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Practical Option for Slim Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taehee Jo ◽  
Dong Nyeok Jeon ◽  
Hyun Ho Han
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Average Body Mass Index ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Average Body Mass ◽  
Artery Perforator ◽  
Average Body

Abstract Background The posterior thigh-based profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has been an emerging option as a secondary choice in breast reconstructions. However, whether a PAP flap could consistently serve as the secondary option in slim patients has not been investigated. Methods Records of immediate unilateral breast reconstructions performed from May 2017 to June 2019 were reviewed. PAP flap breast reconstructions were compared with standard deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions, and were grouped into single or stacked PAP flaps for further analysis. Results Overall, 43 PAP flaps were performed to reconstruct 32 breasts. Eleven patients underwent stacked PAP flap reconstruction, while 17 patients underwent 21 single PAP flap reconstruction. The average body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 22.2 ± 0.5 kg/m2. The results were as follows: no total loss, one case of venous congestion (2.3%), two donor site wound dehiscence cases (4.7%), and one case of fat necrosis from partial flap loss (2.3%). When compared with 192 DIEP flap reconstructions, the final DIEP flap supplied 98.1 ± 1.7% of mastectomy weight, while the final PAP flap supplied 114.1 ± 6.2% of mastectomy weight (p < 0.005), demonstrating that PAP flaps can successfully supply final reconstruction volume. In a separate analysis, single PAP flaps successfully supplied 104.2% (84.2-144.4%) of mastectomy weights, while stacked PAP flaps supplied 103.7% (98.8-115.2%) of mastectomy weights. Conclusion In our series of PAP flap reconstructions performed in low-to-normal BMI patients, we found that PAP flaps, as single or stacked flaps, provide sufficient volume to reconstruct mastectomy defects.

Observations from Implementation of the ERAS Protocol after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Haddock ◽  
Ricardo Garza ◽  
Carolyn E. Boyle ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multivariate intervention requiring the help of several departments, including anesthesia, nursing, and surgery. This study seeks to observe ERAS compliance rates and obstacles for its implementation at a single academic institution. Methods This is a retrospective study looking at patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction from January 2016 to September 2019. The ERAS protocol was implemented on select patients early 2017, with patients from 2016 acting as a control. Thirteen points from the protocol were identified and gathered from the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate compliance. Results Two hundred and six patients were eligible for the study, with 67 on the control group. An average of 6.97 components were met in the pre-ERAS group. This number rose to 8.33 by the end of 2017. Compliance peaked with 10.53 components met at the beginning of 2019. The interventions most responsible for this increase were administration of preoperative medications, goal-oriented intraoperative fluid management, and administration of scheduled gabapentin postoperatively. The least met criterion was intraoperative ketamine goal of >0.2 mg/kg/h, with a maximum compliance rate of 8.69% of the time. Conclusion The introduction of new protocols can take over a year for full implementation. This is especially true for protocols as complex as an ERAS pathway. Even after years of consistent use, compliance gaps remain. Staff-, patient-, or resource-related issues are responsible for these discrepancies. It is important to identify these issues to address them and optimize patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Refractory Donor-Site Seroma Following DIEP Breast Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2513826X1989883
Author(s):  
Trina V. Stephens ◽  
Nancy Van Laeken ◽  
Sheina A. Macadam
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
First Line ◽  
Percutaneous Aspiration ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
History Of ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi Flaps

Donor-site seroma formation is a complication of autologous breast reconstruction reported most commonly with the use of latissimus dorsi flaps. First-line treatment is percutaneous aspiration which leads to resolution in the majority of cases. Those that persist may progress to a chronic, refractory seroma, which can prove challenging in terms of treatment. The aim of this article is to provide an updated literature review of interventions for chronic donor-site seroma and present the case of a 65-year-old female with a recalcitrant abdominal seroma following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Literature review revealed a single article that reported 2 cases of persistent donor-site seroma after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The patient presented here underwent repeat aspiration, drain placement, and multiple surgical procedures to achieve resolution. In total, the post-reconstruction seroma history of the patient extended over approximately 14 months. We conclude with evidence-based suggestions for chronic, donor-site seroma prevention and treatment.

Alternative flaps for microsurgical breast reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 1107-1114
Author(s):  
Hinne A. Rakhorst
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Muscle Sparing ◽  
Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Microsurgery in general has made dramatic improvements over the past decades. This applies to microsurgery in general and to breast reconstructive surgery especially. The demand for autologous breast reconstruction has risen. Since the introduction of the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, through the muscle-sparing TRAM, flaps designs have evolved into the current gold standard, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. From experiences and increasing numbers of flap procedures performed by surgeons, techniques became more familiar and part of standard care. These factors gave rise to the development of a growing number of areas of the body where tissues of interest can be harvested using perforator flap-based techniques. This chapter discusses the most common as well as the ‘rising stars’ in terms of flaps to be used as alternative flaps to the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. It discusses practical issues on dissection as well as donor site morbidity.

Preoperative computed tomography assessment for a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: a new easy technique from the Bologna experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512096389
Author(s):  
Matteo Renzulli ◽  
Alfredo Clemente ◽  
Stefano Brocchi ◽  
Chiara Gelati ◽  
Simone Zanotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Reconstruction Method ◽  
Branching Pattern ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
3D Reconstructions ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator

Background Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is the gold standard reconstructive technique for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. A preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA)-dedicated protocol and 3D reconstructions are mandatory for correct surgical planning. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new preoperative CTA protocol and a new reconstruction method in the assessment of DIEP technique. Material and Methods A total of 263 women (median age 49 years, age range 26–73 years) underwent preoperative CTA examination before DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A CTA-dedicated protocol followed by 3D-reconstructions were performed. Identification, branching pattern, and caliber at origin were assessed for each perforator. Intraoperative findings were the standard of reference. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative CTA protocol were calculated. Results In 255/263 (97%) patients, the dominant perforators assessed by CTA resulted adequate for surgical reconstruction. In 260/263 (99%) cases, the imaging localization of the dominant perforators corresponded with those seen intraoperatively (mean errors ≤1 cm). The preoperative CTA imaging sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy in determining the localization of perforators were 99% (95% CI 98–100), 100% and 99% (95% CI 98–100), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the CTA findings and the surgical findings for the assessment of branching pattern and caliber of the dominant perforators ( P < 0.001). Conclusion The present protocol has demonstrated high accuracy in the CTA imaging assessment of the perforators before DIEP flap reconstruction with high reproducibility between CT and surgical findings.

scholarly journals Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction: standardization of the measurement set-up

Gland Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 799-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip E. F. Thiessen ◽  
Thierry Tondu ◽  
Nicolas Vermeersch ◽  
Ben Cloostermans ◽  
Ralv Lundahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Infrared Thermography ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Set Up
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document