scholarly journals Factors Associated with a Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-544
Author(s):  
Sang Kyu Choi ◽  
Cheol Keun Kim ◽  
Dong In Jo ◽  
Myung Chul Lee ◽  
Jee Nam Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 263177451984632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Yamamiya ◽  
Katsuya Kitamura ◽  
Yu Ishii ◽  
Yuta Mitsui ◽  
Hitoshi Yoshida

Background: This study investigated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. Methods: From January 2014 to December 2016, a single-center retrospective study was conducted. Of the 80 patients with naïve papilla receiving antithrombotic treatment who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy, 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. We divided the participants into two groups as follows: 45 patients who discontinued antithrombotic treatment (discontinuation group) and 31 patients who continued antithrombotic treatment (continuation group). We evaluated the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with naïve papilla who received antithrombotic treatment. Results: The percentage of patients requiring emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the continuation group was significantly higher than that in the discontinuation group (55% vs 11%; p = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Neither bleeding nor perforation occurred in either group. The length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment may be safe if the guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment are followed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Memon

Objectives: This study aims to scientifically fill the gap and provide the scientific data regarding risk factors associated with prolonged length of hospital stay (PLOS) in children admitted at Isra University Hospital. Study Design: Descriptive case series study. Setting: Pediatric ward of Isra University Hospital Hyderabad. Period: 22 months from February 2016 till November 2017. Material and Methods: All the children having age ≥ one year and less than 10 years hospitalized due to any cause of either gender were enrolled under this study. A proforma was designed comprising of basic demographic variables like age and gender and relevant questions like cause of hospitalization, risk factors associated with PLOS, and duration of hospital stay. All the information was noted in proforma and analyzed using SPSS version 17.0. Results: In present study we collected data of 188 children. In group A (age >1 to 5 years) there were 109 children consisted of 57.97% and remaining group B (age >6 years to 10 years) there were 79 children consisted of 42.02%. The overall mean duration of hospital stay with SD was 12.21 ± 3.14. The mean age and SD of group A was 2.33 ± 1.09 years and group B was 7.01 ± 2.39 years. Children with Group A (age ≥1 year to 5 years), Females, late seeking of medical attention, children not responding on medical treatment, and those who get infected during hospitalization were significantly associated with prolonged length of hospital stay (p <0.05). Conclusion: Younger children with age less than 5 years having female predominance and delayed seeking of medical attention were the most significant risk factors associated with PLOS in our population.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadii M Mamudu ◽  
Sylvester Orimaye ◽  
Manul Awasthi ◽  
Arsham Alamian ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
...  

Introduction: The Appalachian region has a disproportionate rate of morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular diseases (CVD), compared to other regions in the United States. Readmission after initial hospitalization for CVD is a major health and economic burden. However, little is known about the factors that contribute to a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) after readmission for CVD in rural Appalachia. This study aimed to identify factors associated with prolonged LOS after readmission of patients with CVD in rural Appalachian region. Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that certain demographic and CVD risk factors would be positively and significantly associated with prolonged LOS after readmission of patients with CVD. Methods: Study population consisted of 2,063 patients from Central Appalachia who were diagnosed with ≥1 CVD-related medical comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, depressive symptoms, coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure) and readmitted between 2010 and 2016 to a large health system. The average LOS was assessed and the Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios (HR) were calculated to identify factors associated with prolonged LOS (defined as a LOS of six or more days) after readmission among CVD patients. The median LOS and probability of prolonged LOS for different sociodemographic risk groups in the study population were calculated. Results: The average LOS was 13.44±45.77 days. A one-year increase in the age of CVD patients tended to increase the risk of prolonged LOS by 0.6% (95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p=0.04). Additionally, being male was found to be associated with increased risk of prolonged LOS (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.34; p<0.001). Similarly, having at least one CVD related comorbid condition increased the risk of prolonged LOS by 23.3% (95% CI: 1.03-1.47; p=0.02). Our findings also showed that both underweight and obese CVD patients were at 58.2% (95% CI: 0.52-0.65; p<0.0001) and 53.6% (95% CI: 0.50-0.56; p<0.0001) higher risk of having a prolonged LOS, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, increasing age, being male, having ≥1 comorbidities of CVD, and being underweight or obese were positively associated with prolonged LOS after hospital readmission in this rural population. These findings suggest that preventing and treating comorbid conditions and CVD risk factors may lower the likelihood of a prolonged LOS after readmission.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hasan Ghandhari ◽  
◽  
Ebrahim Ameri ◽  
Mohsen Motalebi ◽  
Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽  
...  

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (04) ◽  
pp. 344-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Abola ◽  
Joseph Tanenbaum ◽  
Thomas Bomberger ◽  
Derrick Knapik ◽  
Steven Fitzgerald ◽  
...  

AbstractHyponatremia is a risk factor for adverse surgical outcomes, but limited information is available on the prognosis of hyponatremic patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this investigation was to compare the incidence of major morbidity (MM), 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and length of hospital stay (LOS) between normonatremic and hypontremic TKA patients.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify all primary TKA procedures. Hyponatremia was defined as <135 mEq/L and normonatremia as 135 to 145 mEq/L; hypernatremic patients (>145 mEq/L) were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between hyponatremia and outcomes after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. An α level of 0.002 was used and calculated using the Bonferroni correction. Our final analysis included 88,103 patients of which 3,763 were hyponatremic and 84,340 were normonatremic preoperatively. In our multivariable models, hyponatremic patients did not have significantly higher odds of experiencing an MM (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05; 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.93–1.19) or readmission (OR: 1.12; 99% CI: 1–1.24). However, patients with hyponatremia did experience significantly greater odds for reoperation (OR: 1.24; 99% CI: 1.05–1.46) and longer hospital stay (OR: 1.15; 99% CI: 1.09–1.21). We found that hyponatremic patients undergoing TKA had increased odds of reoperation and prolonged hospital stay. Preoperative hyponatremia may be a modifiable risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing TKA, and additional prospective studies are warranted to determine whether preoperative correction of hyponatremia can prevent complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document