scholarly journals Questionable Use of the Mathematical Concept of Equivalence by Psychologists

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-126
Author(s):  
Makoto Yamaguchi

Psychologists have applied the mathematical concept of an equivalence relation to such topics as concept formation and foundations of language. This line of research is not without controversies, and most researchers have only intuitive understanding of this mathematical concept. In this article, accessible explanations are provided on fundamental issues that have implications for empirical research.

1967 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 400-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence T. Frase

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renan Barbosa de Morais ◽  
Mário César San Felice ◽  
Pedro Henrique Del Bianco Hokama ◽  
Gabriel Ávila Casalecchi

Proportionality in political representation is an essential theme forrepresentative democracy. In Brazil, this debate appears in the contextof non-proportionality between a federative unit’s populationsize and its number of representatives in the Chamber of Deputies.In other words, the number of deputies in a state is not proportionalto its number of inhabitants, which violates the "one man, one vote"principle.Discussions around this disproportionality have motivated scholarsto develop empirical research that aims to identify the causesand consequences of the phenomenon and to analyze the impactthat the rule introduces in the political process. This article seeksto contribute to this debate by measuring the effective power ofeach Brazilian federation’s entity and proposing alternatives ofdistribution for the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.To this end, we use a mathematical concept from game theory,called Power Index, which allows quantifying the existing representationaldiscrepancies. After evaluating several distributions, wesolved the Inverse Power Index Problem (IPIP) to obtain a distributionof chairs that reduces such disparities. To solve the IPIP, whichis computationally hard, we use an evolutionary heuristic. As anobjective function to minimize the discrepancy, we use the linearShapley rule, in which the power index of each state is proportionalto its population.


1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-227
Author(s):  
Richard J. Shumway

Are there measurable differences in general mathematics achievement, inductive reasoning, syllogistic reasoning, perceptual speed, and tendency to overgeneralize between groups learning mathematical concepts through the use of positive instances (C groups), and groups learning mathematical concepts through the use of both positive and negative instances (E groups)? 84 eighth grade mathematics students in 4 classes served as subjects for 65 days. Analysis of variance and covariance of pre- and posttest means yielded significant differences (p<.05) indicating that the E groups tended to overgeneralize less frequently than the C groups. No other differences in means were significant (p<.05). It appears that the use of negative instances may be a means for controlling the common error of overgeneralization.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Zulianello

On the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the concept of anti-system party it is time to ask whether it enjoys good health in addition to longevity. Reflecting on what constitutes an anti-system party appears to be of unprecedented relevance, particularly in the light of the electoral success of populist parties such as the French Front National, the Five Star Movement in Italy and Syriza in Greece. This article highlights two crucial questions that remain unsolved if we follow existing conceptualizations: What are the boundaries of the concept? When does a party cease to be anti-system and how can it be reclassified thereafter? In order to overcome such limitations, this article develops a revisited concept of anti-system party and provides a set of guidelines for its empirical application. Furthermore, a novel typology capable of investigating the evolution of anti-system parties and classifying political parties in general is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document