scholarly journals The Nodal Anatomy of Myrothamnus flabellifolius (Myrothamnaceae) : Another Example of a "Split-Lateral" Condition

1978 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-196
Author(s):  
Christian Puff
Author(s):  
Zhen-Qing Chen ◽  
Masatoshi Fukushima

This chapter proposes a boundary theory for symmetric Markov processes. It begins by investigating the relationship between the space (Fₑ,E) and the space ((ℱ⁰)ref, ℰ 0,ref). Next, the chapter focuses on the restricted spaces ℱ₀∣F, ℱ∣F and their descriptions in terms of the Feller measures U, V, and U α‎ and the Douglas integrals defined by them. The chapter then introduces the lateral condition for the L² generator and studies the case where the set F consists of countably many points that are located in an invariant way under a quasi-homeomorphism. It then turns to one-point extensions and examples of these, and follows up with many-point extensions and their examples as well.


PROTOPLASMA ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 203 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Cook ◽  
L. E. Graham ◽  
C. A. Lavin

Phytotaxa ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
KUMAR K. ANAND ◽  
SATYA N. JENA ◽  
LAL B. CHAUDHARY ◽  
MUNNA SINGH

Ficus krishnae, considered as highly sacred plant species in India, is well known for its peculiar nature of cup-shaped leaves. The species distinctly differs from its allied species F. benghalensis not only in the cup formation in leaves but also in the height of plants, aerial roots, stipules, petiole and its leafy appendages, ostiolar bracts of the receptacle and pollinator wasps, in addition to slight differences in the karyotype, DNA contents, stomatal and parenchymatous cells and nodal anatomy. In spite of having several morphological differences, F. krishnae is considered by some authors as a synonym of F. benghalensis, which does not seem to be convincing. Contrary to the morphological differences, the sequence analysis of nuclear and plastid regions of both the species conducted in the present study does not reveal any significant variations and thus infers no differentiation between the species at molecular level. This may be due to mutations at one or few coding loci or differences in gene expression associated with morphogenesis with significant phenotypic appearance.


1961 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-294
Author(s):  
Otto T Solbrig
Keyword(s):  

1963 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Deshpande ◽  
C. L. Keswani

1987 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Dickison
Keyword(s):  

1956 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-287
Author(s):  
Irving W. Bailey
Keyword(s):  

Imaging ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 20120003
Author(s):  
A McCarthy ◽  
S Mohan ◽  
A Saeed ◽  
M Kumaran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document