scholarly journals Organizing scientific research for war; the administrative history of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Foreword by Vannevar Bush.

Author(s):  
Irvin Stewart
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Carlos Henrique de Brito Cruz

Em 17 de novembro de 1944, quando os cientistas do Projeto Manhattan já previam que teriam um artefato nuclear pronto antes de agosto de 1945, cientistas de vários outros laboratórios no Reino Unido e nos EUA já tinham desenvolvido os radares decisivos para defender a população de cidades da Inglaterra dos bombardeiros nazistas e muitas outras tecnologias relevantes para o esforço de guerra norte-americano estavam se provando importantes no campo de batalha, o presidente Franklin Roosevelt enviou a Vannevar Bush, diretor do Escritório de Pesquisa Científica e Desenvolvimento (Office of Scientific Research and Development, que articulava e supervisionava a maior parte do esforço de pesquisa para defesa)...


1994 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Owens

Established to mobilize science during the Second World War, the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) and its director, Vannevar Bush, created new weapons as well as a new relationship between science and government that helped shape Cold War America. Yet much about the partnership that emerged disappointed Bush, especially its uncontrolled expansion and the failure of civilian oversight. The failure, ironically, as this article explains, can be traced to the very approach that allowed Bush to mobilize rapidly during wartime, especially to an “associationalism” and contractual strategy that centralized the management of R&D in Washington while leaving its performance to private contractors. Forged in more conservative decades, the strategy facilitated the rapid exploitation of private-sector resources at the cost of promoting the uncontrolled proliferation of public-private arrangements that undercut Bush's postwar hopes.


Substantia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Jack Cohen

The US lagged behind the European powers, Germany, Britain and France, in scientific research and development at the beginning of the 20th century. Why this occurred and how Germany and Britain supported their flourishing scientific research cultures are discussed. The first serious expansion in basic scientific research in the US occurred with the influx of European Jewish scientists fleeing Nazism in the 1930’s. They specifically brought with them knowledge of atomic physics. The influence of Vannevar Bush, who was Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development during World War Two proved crucial for the expansion of civilian research and development after the War, supported by the Federal Government. Also after the War, Operation Paperclip brought German scientists to the US and they had significant influence on developments in aeronautics, rocketry and space exploration.


Author(s):  
Olexandr S. Popovych ◽  

The article highlights the specific features of the development of the NAS of Ukraine related to the activities of B.Ye. Paton after his election as president of the Academy. It is shown that the implementation of the course announced by him to strengthen the links between science and industry and accelerate the practical use of research and development results in the national economy has allowed to almost double the total funding of the Academy by attracting customers. At the same time, its structure changed dramatically: along with new scientific institutes, design and technological bureaus, research plants, powerful scientific and technological complexes and engineering centers were created. The material and technical base of scientific research has been significantly strengthened, two academy towns have been created, numerous institute buildings and large volumes of housing for the Academy's employees have been built. It is significant that all this took place in the so-called “period of stabilization of science”, when the vast majority of research centers and branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences and academies of sciences of the union republics did not have the opportunity to develop in this way. This specificity of the development of the Ukrainian Academy is due to the initiative of its president, Academician B.Ye. Paton and his perseverance in implementing this course. The article uses materials from official statistics, supplemented by the author's impressions and observations, because he observed these processes both from within, working at the NAS of Ukraine, and from outside, visiting most research centers and branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Mack Kennedy ◽  
Karsten Pruess ◽  
Marcelo J. Lippmann ◽  
Ernest L. Majer ◽  
Peter E. Rose ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document