scholarly journals Preservation of the wild animals of North America,

1904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Fairfield Osborn
Keyword(s):  
1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Romeo J. Mansueti ◽  
A. Remington Kellogg ◽  
Merle Severy
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1885 ◽  
Vol ns-6 (144s) ◽  
pp. 416-417
Author(s):  
Ernest Ingersoll
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1885 ◽  
Vol ns-6 (144s) ◽  
pp. 416-417
Author(s):  
Ernest Ingersoll
Keyword(s):  

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil D’Cruze ◽  
Sophie Khan ◽  
Gemma Carder ◽  
David Megson ◽  
Emma Coulthard ◽  
...  

We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised (n = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class (n = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals.


1961 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Richard H. Manville ◽  
National Geographic Society
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Edward William Nelson ◽  
Louis Agassiz Fuertes ◽  
Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1918 ◽  
Vol 48 (1248) ◽  
pp. 547-549
Author(s):  
J. Grinnell
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grażyna Jeżewska-Witkowska ◽  
Beata Horecka ◽  
Andrzej Jakubczak ◽  
Kornel Kasperek ◽  
Brygida Ślaska ◽  
...  

Abstract This study was designed to determine the degree of genetic distinctiveness between farmed and wild foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Analysis of polymorphism in 16 microsatellite sequences led to the conclusion that red foxes raised on Polish farms and wild foxes living in Poland are two groups of genetically distinct animals. Farmed Polish foxes are genetically more similar to the population of wild animals from North America than they are to the free-living population in Poland, as confirmed by the fact that the farmed animals are descended from animals raised in Canada. The small genetic distance between wild Canadian foxes (indicated as the progenitor of farmed Polish foxes) and farmed Polish foxes possibly suggests that the differences between the farmed and wild Polish populations may result from the fact that Canadian and Polish foxes took separate evolutionary paths.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document