Elementary Mathematics Specialists: Influencing Student Achievement

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia F. Campbell ◽  
Nathaniel N. Malkus

A three-year study found that those responsible for coaching math teachers positively affected student academic progress in grades 3, 4, and 5. Read why this effect took time to emerge.

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Harbour ◽  
Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides

To support continuous professional development model in the teaching and learning of mathematics, many districts and schools have begun hiring elementary mathematics coaches and/or specialists (MCSs). However, limited large-scale empirical research exists that determines how the use of MCSs affect student learning and achievement. Kristin E. Harbour and Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides begin to fill in this gap by using data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress to explore the relationship between the presence and responsibilities of elementary MCSs and 4th-grade student achievement in mathematics. Based on their findings, they share practical implications for districts and administrators to consider.


Author(s):  
Bernadette Kelley ◽  
Lisa McClelland

This chapter presents a case study involving the fictional Coastal University’s move to the next level of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) student achievement by applying a holistic approach to educating the STEM student using a learning community. Learning communities are designed to improve retention rates, increase student learning and achievement, increase faculty engagement, and lessen the feelings of isolation some students feel on large campuses. This case discusses the various components that were utilized to enhance the learning community including cluster courses, seminars, branch activities, academic progress assessments, and meetings. The challenges with the implementation of the learning community and the engagement in interdisciplinary activities will be discussed as will recommendations for the future.


AERA Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 233285841769051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Koedel ◽  
Diyi Li ◽  
Morgan S. Polikoff ◽  
Tenice Hardaway ◽  
Stephani L. Wrabel

We estimate relative achievement effects of the four most commonly adopted elementary mathematics textbooks in the fall of 2008 and fall of 2009 in California. Our findings indicate that one book, Houghton Mifflin’s California Math, is more effective than the other three, raising student achievement by 0.05 to 0.08 student-level standard deviations of the Grade 3 state standardized math test. We also estimate positive effects of California Math relative to the other textbooks in higher elementary grades. The differential effect of California Math is educationally meaningful, particularly given that it is a schoolwide effect and can be had at what is effectively zero marginal cost.


2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha Ing ◽  
Noreen M. Webb ◽  
Megan L. Franke ◽  
Angela C. Turrou ◽  
Jacqueline Wong ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia F. Campbell ◽  
Nathaniel N. Malkus

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 196-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey Webel ◽  
Kimberly A. Conner ◽  
Christina Sheffel ◽  
James E. Tarr ◽  
Christopher Austin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document