Formative Assessment through Think Alouds

2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (8) ◽  
pp. 598-606
Author(s):  
Tiara Hicks ◽  
Jonathan D. Bostic
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Think Alouds ◽  
Assessment Approach ◽  
Whole Class

We describe a formative assessment approach called whole-class think alouds, which foster evidence-based instructional practices and promote the goal of assessment to promote learning. They allow students to collaborate and orally communicate their problem solving.

Practice-Based Evidence: A Model for Helping Educators Make Evidence-Based Decisions

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Fink Chorzempa ◽  
Michael D. Smith ◽  
Jane M. Sileo
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Graduate Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Certification Programs ◽  
K 12

Within their teacher preparation courses and field experiences, preservice teachers are introduced to numerous instructional practices, not all of which are considered research-based. For this reason, instruction in how to evaluate the effectiveness of one’s practices is essential, but it is often a lacking component of initial certification programs. In this article, a flexible, problem-solving model for collecting and reflecting on practice-based evidence (PBE) is described. The model, utilized in a graduate program in Special Education, was designed to assist teacher candidates in evaluating the effectiveness of the practices they implement to optimize students’ learning outcomes. Implications for practice in the K-12 environment are also provided.

Gathering Response Process Data for a Problem-Solving Measure through Whole-Class Think Alouds

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-60
Author(s):  
Jonathan David Bostic ◽  
Toni A. Sondergeld ◽  
Gabriel Matney ◽  
Gregory Stone ◽  
Tiara Hicks
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Response Process ◽  
Think Alouds ◽  
Whole Class

scholarly journals Brief Psychotherapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Nieuwsma ◽  
Ranak B. Trivedi ◽  
Jennifer McDuffie ◽  
Ian Kronish ◽  
Dinesh Benjamin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Brief Psychotherapy ◽  
Problem Solving Therapy

Objective: Because evidence-based psychotherapies of 12 to 20 sessions can be perceived as too lengthy and time intensive for the treatment of depression in primary care, a number of studies have examined abbreviated psychotherapy protocols. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of brief psychotherapy (i.e., < 8 sessions) for depression. Methods: We used combined literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and an Internet-accessible database of clinical trials of psychotherapy to conduct two systematic searches: one for existing systematic reviews and another for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Included studies examined evidence-based psychotherapy(s) of eight or fewer sessions, focused on adults with depression, contained an acceptable control condition, were published in English, and used validated measures of depressive symptoms. Results: We retained 2 systematic reviews and 15 RCTs evaluating cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. The systematic reviews found brief psychotherapies to be more efficacious than control, with effect sizes ranging from −0.33 to −0.25. Our meta-analysis found six to eight sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy to be more efficacious than control (ES −0.42, 95% CI −0.74 to −0.10, I2 = 56%). A sensitivity analysis controlled for statistical heterogeneity but showed smaller treatment effects (ES −0.24, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.06, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Depression can be efficaciously treated with six to eight sessions of psychotherapy, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy and problem-solving therapy. Access to non-pharmacologic treatments for depression could be improved by training healthcare providers to deliver brief psychotherapies.

Commentary on Carter, Stephenson and Strnadová's Reported Prevalence by Australian Special Educators of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Ian Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Formative Evaluation ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Motor Training ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Australasian Journal ◽  
High Effect ◽  
Current Article

AbstractIn Volume 35, Issue 1 of the Australasian Journal of Special Education, Carter, Stephenson and Strnadová (2011) replicated a study by Burns and Ysseldyke (2009). In Carter et al.'s study, 194 Australian special educators were asked to rate the extent to which they used eight instructional practices. These practices were applied behaviour analysis, direct instruction, formative evaluation, mnemonic strategies, modality training, perceptual-motor training, psycholinguistic training, and social skills training. The first four of these practices had moderate to high effect sizes (and were regarded by the authors as more desirable techniques), and the final four practices had low effect sizes, on the basis of past meta-analytic research. Carter et al.'s findings were that while the Australian teachers used some desirable strategies relatively frequently, they also used some less desirable practices frequently and so desirable instructional practices should be encouraged at the expense of less effective practices. While these results are of interest, they also have the potential to mislead readers and later sections of the current article examine these potential misconceptions.

Selecting and Sequencing Students' Solution Strategies

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M. Meikle
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Solution Strategies ◽  
Class Discussions ◽  
Challenging Tasks ◽  
Whole Class ◽  
Fine Tune

For orchestrating whole-class discussions, note these suggestions to fine tune problem-solving techniques into cognitively challenging tasks.

Instructional Practices, Priorities, and Preparedness for Educating Students With Autism and Intellectual Disability

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria F. Knight ◽  
Heartley B. Huber ◽  
Emily M. Kuntz ◽  
Erik W. Carter ◽  
A. Pablo Juarez
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Professional Judgment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Students With Autism ◽  
Services And Supports ◽  
Instructional Decision

Improving educational outcomes for students with autism and intellectual disability requires delivering services and supports marked by evidence-based practices. We surveyed 535 special educators of students with autism and/or intellectual disability about (a) their implementation of 26 instructional practices, (b) their recent access to training and resources on those practices, (c) the factors they consider when deciding which practices to use, (d) the importance they place on various instructional areas (e.g., social skills, reading), and (e) their preparedness to provide that instruction. Although teachers reported implementing a wide range of evidence-based instructional practices, their recent access to training and resources was fairly limited. Special educators identified a constellation of factors informing their instructional decision making, placing emphasis on student needs and professional judgment. When considering instructional areas, a gap was evident between ratings of importance and preparedness. We address implications for strengthening professional development pathways and offer recommendations for future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document