Fact Strategy 
Instruction + Meaningful 
Discourse = Student Understanding

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 558-564
Author(s):  
Deborah M. Thompson ◽  
A. Susan Gay
Keyword(s):  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Student Understanding ◽  
Student Discourse

This article provides actionable steps and tools for teachers to use to promote student discourse while teaching multiplication fact strategies.

scholarly journals Socratic Seminar with Data: A Strategy to Support Student Discourse and Understanding

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Griswold ◽  
Loren Shaw ◽  
Maureen Munn
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Student Understanding ◽  
School Type ◽  
Student Discourse ◽  
Complex Information ◽  
Student Misconceptions

A Socratic seminar can be a powerful tool for increasing students’ ability to analyze and interpret data. Most commonly used for text-based discussion, we found that using Socratic seminar to engage students with data contributes to student understanding by allowing them to reason through and process complex information as a group. This approach also provides teachers with insights about student misconceptions and understanding of concepts by listening to the student-driven discussion. This article reports on Socratic seminar in the context of a high school type 2 diabetes curriculum that explores gene and environment interactions. A case study illustrates how Socratic seminar is applied in a classroom and how students engage with the process. General characteristics of Socratic seminar are discussed at the end of the article.

Promoting students’ critical thinking through reading strategy instruction in a reading class

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-151
Author(s):  
K.R. Vinitha Rani
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Reading Strategy ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Reading Strategy Instruction ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Bilingual School

This study examined the application of Reading Strategy Instruction (RSI) in a reading class to promote the critical thinking skills of the second language learners. It aims to find out (1) the critical thinking elements in the questions formulated by the participants before the application of RSI, and (2) the critical thinking elements found in the (a) three selected questions, (b) answers, and (c) reflections written by the participants after the application of RSI. This study included sixteen grade 11 participants of a bilingual school in Jakarta, aged between 16 to 18 years old. The participants underwent two stages (1) before the application of RSI, and (2) after the application of RSI. The RSI applied in this study was a modification of Rothstein & Santana’s (2014) “Question Formulation Technique” and Alder’s (2001) comprehension strategies in answering questions. The collected data were analysed by using the modified critical thinking indicators proposed by Mason (1991) and Henri (1992). The results of the study revealed that applying RSI in the reading class was beneficial in promoting the participants’ critical thinking skills. RSI helped the participants to (i) think differently, (ii) use prior background knowledge, (iii) question the facts given in the text, (iv) identify the issues given in the text, (v) give valid solutions to the problem, (vi) connect themselves with the text and the world, and (vii) justify their arguments using valid examples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document