Technology Tips: Technology Resource Tools

2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. 622-625

This month is the final issue in which I will serve as editor of the “Technology Tips” column. It has been an exciting year of learning new technologies and working with several authors in preparing their tips. Thank you to everyone who contributed a Tech Tip this year. I would also like to thank Suzanne Harper, my co–editor, Rod Rodrigues, our liaison from the Mathematics Teacher Editorial Panel, and Nancy Blue Williams, the journal editor, for their collaboration in preparing each column. Suzanne Harper will step into the shoes of editor for the 2005–2006 volume year. I hope you will continue to enjoy the tips offered by others and consider contributing to Suzanne your own tip that can teach the rest of us some new skills and ideas for using technology in the mathematics classroom.

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-97
Author(s):  
Ana Kuzle

Problem solving in Germany has roots in mathematics and psychology but it found its way to schools and classrooms, especially through German Kultusministerkonferenz, which represents all government departments of education. For the problem solving standard to get implemented in schools, a large scale dissemination through continuous professional development is very much needed, as the current mathematics teachers are not qualified to do so. As a consequence, one organ in Germany focuses on setting up courses for teacher educators who can “multiply” what they have learned and set up their own professional development courses for teachers. However, before attaining to this work, it is crucial to have an understanding what conceptions about teaching problem solving in mathematics classroom mathematics teacher educators hold. In this research report, I focus on mathematics teacher educators’ conceptions about problem solving standard and their effects regarding a large-scale dissemination.


1986 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-216
Author(s):  
James R. Smart

The greater-than-expected success of the original article, “Questions about Numbers Outside the Mathematics Classroom” (Mathematics Teacher 72 [November 1979]:624–25), has resulted in repeated requests for a second test of the same sort. These real-life uses of numbers on the new test have been common over a long period of time, yet many of us have not stopped to consider them carefully.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Catherine Attard

The fast pace of development of ICT often results in primary teachers being expected to integrate new technologies effectively prior to the emergence of research findings that provide exemplars of best practice. This discussion paper explores contemporary research into ICT and primary school mathematics, and the issues that arise in relation to mobile technologies such as computer tablets in primary school classrooms. Although studies are beginning to emerge, this paper presents the argument that further research that would assist teachers in being prepared to teach mathematics with any technological tool would be more beneficial than working retrospectively to explore the use of specific devices that have already emerged in primary classrooms.


1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 736-739

This issue of the Mathematics Teacher focuses on proof. Technology is often useful in the mathematics classroom to aid students in conjecturing about new ideas before they complete formal proofs. Good activity sheets that use the power of technology often direct student discovery through multiple examples. Exercises using technology should frequently ask questions that require students to confirm their understanding of what is happening and what conceptual ideas support the evolving process being explored. They also need the flexibility of extensions or “explore more” questions so that students who work through the exercise more rapidly can continue while other students complete the core concepts.


Author(s):  
Sarah B. Bush ◽  
Shannon O. Driskell ◽  
Margaret L. Niess ◽  
David Pugalee ◽  
Christopher R. Rakes ◽  
...  

The rapid expansion of technology integration in everyday lives calls for a rethinking of teaching and learning with current and emerging digital technologies. How have pre-service teachers been prepared for teaching with these new technologies? Are they prepared for this educational revolution? This chapter presents an analysis of the impact of digital technologies in mathematics pre-service teacher preparation over the past four decades. The chapter examines how various technology types, content strands, grade-level bands, teacher outcomes, conceptual frameworks, research questions, and alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) (CCSSO, 2010) Mathematical Practices (CCSSM-MP) have influenced the outcomes from mathematics teacher education papers and how this literature has affected teacher preparation. The goal of this examination is to identify recommendations for future mathematics teacher preparation research that show promise for revising mathematics teacher preparation in this digital age.


1991 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-171
Author(s):  
Adele LeGere

For twenty-five years I have taught mathematics using a great deal of lecture, much dialogue between students and myself, a limited amount of small-group work, and very little writing. As a mathematics teacher at both the high school and community college levels, I believed that clear presentations were my primary responsibility. It was difficult enough to find sufficient time to cover all prescribed content without taking more time for writing and group work.


Author(s):  
Sarah B. Bush ◽  
Shannon O. Driskell ◽  
Margaret L. Niess ◽  
David Pugalee ◽  
Christopher R. Rakes ◽  
...  

The rapid expansion of technology integration in everyday lives calls for a rethinking of teaching and learning with current and emerging digital technologies. How have pre-service teachers been prepared for teaching with these new technologies? Are they prepared for this educational revolution? This chapter presents an analysis of the impact of digital technologies in mathematics pre-service teacher preparation over the past four decades. The chapter examines how various technology types, content strands, grade-level bands, teacher outcomes, conceptual frameworks, research questions, and alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) (CCSSO, 2010) Mathematical Practices (CCSSM-MP) have influenced the outcomes from mathematics teacher education papers and how this literature has affected teacher preparation. The goal of this examination is to identify recommendations for future mathematics teacher preparation research that show promise for revising mathematics teacher preparation in this digital age.


Author(s):  
Sarah B. Bush ◽  
Shannon O. Driskell ◽  
Margaret L. Niess ◽  
David K. Pugalee ◽  
Christopher R. Rakes ◽  
...  

The rapid expansion of technology integration in everyday lives calls for a rethinking of teaching and learning with current and emerging digital technologies. How have pre-service teachers been prepared for teaching with these new technologies? Are they prepared for this educational revolution? This chapter presents an analysis of the impact of digital technologies in mathematics pre-service teacher preparation over the past four decades. The chapter examines how various technology types, content strands, grade-level bands, teacher outcomes, conceptual frameworks, research questions, and alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) (CCSSO, 2010) Mathematical Practices (CCSSM-MP) have influenced the outcomes from mathematics teacher education papers and how this literature has affected teacher preparation. The goal of this examination is to identify recommendations for future mathematics teacher preparation research that show promise for revising mathematics teacher preparation in this digital age.


Author(s):  
Bożena Maj-Tatsis ◽  
Marta Pytlak

In the paper we present the results of two teaching episodes, which took place in two middle school classes with 13- and 14-year-old students. The students in both classes were asked to solve the same geometrical problem;then a discussion followed, in which they had to justify their solutions. In both cases the students had no prior experience in solving non-typical mathematical problems. Additionally, the students were asked to justify theiranswers, which is not a common characteristic of a ‘typical’ mathematics classroom at that level. The problem was chosen from a wider study, in which twenty classes from twenty different schools were analysed. One of theaims of the present study was to analyse the skills that require a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts and properties. Particularly, we aimed to investigate students’ different solution methods and justifications duringproblem solving. The results show considerable differences among the two classes, not only concerning the depth of investigating (which was expected due to the different age groups), but also concerning the relationship betweenachievement (as assessed by the mathematics teacher) and success in solving the problem. These results demonstrate the need for re-directing mathematics education from a pure algorithmic to a deeper thinking approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document