Rethinking the First Two Years of High School Mathematics with the UCSMP

1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-647
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Hirschhorn ◽  
Denisse R. Thompson ◽  
Zalman Usiskin ◽  
Sharon L. Senk

The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) was begun in 1983 as an attempt to implement the recommendations of many reports to improve school mathematics. The national reports available at the time (e.g., NACOME [1975); NCTM [1980]; CBMS [19821; College Board [19831; NCEE [1983)) called for a curriculum of broader scope that would include statistics, probability, and discrete mathematics and that would give strong attention to applications, use the latest in technology, and emphasize problem solving. To accomplish the curricular revolution recommended by these reports, it was essential that new, appropriate materials be written. History had shown that neither materials written for the best students, such as those from the new-math era, nor materials written for the slower students, such as those popular in the backto-basics movement, were appropriate for the vast majority of students without major revisions (Usiskin 1985). Thus UCSMP started with the goal of developing mathematics for all grades K–12 that would be appropriate for the majority of students in the middle.

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Harwell ◽  
Thomas R. Post ◽  
Amanuel Medhanie ◽  
Danielle N. Dupuis ◽  
Brandon LeBeau

This study examined the relationship between high school mathematics curricula and student achievement and course-taking patterns over 4 years of college. Three types of curricula were studied: National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded curricula, the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project curriculum, and commercially developed curricula. The major result was that high school mathematics curricula were unrelated to college mathematics achievement or students' course-taking patterns for students who began college with precalculus (college algebra) or a more difficult course. However, students of the NSF-funded curricula were statistically more likely to begin their college mathematics at the developmental level.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 392-393
Author(s):  
Henry Kranendonk

In “Standards for High School Mathematics: Why, What, How?” in the December 2008/January 2009 issue of Mathematics Teacher, Eric W. Hart and W. Gary Martin summarized a perplexing problem in the U.S. education system—namely, the challenge of reforming high school mathematics. The article referenced a 2007 conference sponsored by the Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum that addressed two important questions concerning mathematics achievement: What should students learn, and when should they learn it? Presenters from Achieve, Inc., the American Statistical Association, the College Board, the Mathematics Association of America (MAA), and NCTM openly discussed and debated the topic questions. The conference provided an excellent format for dialogue about the nuts and bolts of what students should be taught and when these topics should be taught in the K–12 timeline. Several participants acknowledged, however, that additional factors complicate our challenges with high school students.


2017 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen N. Bieda ◽  
Craig Huhn

Middle and high school mathematics teachers share what they learned about supporting students by conducting a series of three lesson studies.


1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Roger P. Day

While teaching junior high school mathematics at the Stavanger American School in Norway. I sensed the need to challenge the students' perceptions of mathematics. The seventh and eighth graders seemed most concerned with producing correct answers. They saw little need for questioning, evaluating, checking, and comparing. They simply wanted to be shown “how to do it.” I set out to implement a problem-solving component within the structure of the junior high school curriculum that would alter this. “right-wrong-produce an anwer” mind set. This article reports my experience and sets forth ideas that may work for you.


2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 508-513
Author(s):  
Christine P. Trinter ◽  
Joe Garofalo

Nonroutine function tasks are more challenging than most typical high school mathematics tasks. In our classes of precalculus students and preservice mathematics teachers, we have found that nonroutine tasks encourage our students to expand their thinking about functions and their approaches to problem solving. As a result, they gain greater appreciation for the power of multiple representations and a richer understanding of functions.


1921 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 334-336
Author(s):  
Horace C. Wright

In August, 1919, at a departmental meeting of the University High School mathematics department, I asked for permission to conduct a section of first year pupils without assigning them homework. Permission was granted and the idea was carried out in all the freshmen mathematics classes.


1978 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-180
Author(s):  
James S. Braswell

From time to time I have been asked to speak to groups of high school mathematics teachers about the mathematical portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). This article affords an opportunity to provide current information about this test to a greater audience of mathematics teachers and others interested in mathematics education.


1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 510-512
Author(s):  
William S. Hadley

With the release of NCTM's curriculum standards in the spring of 1989, emphasis on mathematics-curriculum reform at all levels K-12 has been renewed. Reform is obviously long overdue, but one major obstacle stands in the way of its achievement: the classroom teachers. Given t he proper opportunities, however, teachers can become the key to success.


1958 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Leo Moser

For the past four years we have given, at the University of Alberta, a course entitled "The Nature of Mathematics". This course is open to first and second year students in arts and science and in education, and is designed primarily for those who will be taking only a single course in mathematics at the university. The only prerequisite for the course is high school mathematics and the course is not prerequisite for any other course.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document