Implementing the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics: The Evaluation of Teaching: Challenge and Opportunity
Teachers are under enormous pressure to produce results, and, directly or indirectly, teaching evaluations are part of that pressure. In Kentucky, for example, schools are rewarded or sanctioned, depending on their students' performance on various types of assessments (Bush 1992). To channel reform energy into productive effort, a change must occur in the current preoccupation with finding scapegoats for poor student performance and on holding teachers singularly accountable for shortcomings in the educational system. Shifting the focus of teaching evaluations from teacher accountability to improving instruction is a step in the right direction because it will increase the usefulness of these evaluations as teachers work to increase students' learning in mathematics. Any reoriented teaching-evaluation process must be comprehensive in nature and involve a cyclic process of teaching assessment, professional development, and instructional change, as advocated in the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991).