The Quadratic Formula—an Enrichment Approach

1972 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-473
Author(s):  
Kenneth Stilwell

The procedure of completing the square, used in deriving the quadratic formula, is pervasive in mathematics. The following is presented as an alternate method of derivation of the quadratic formula for students studying analytic geometry. It is not intended to replace the traditional derivation, but rather is presented as an enrichment topic based on the student's ability to solve pure quadratic equations (that, is, equations of the form ax2 + b = 0, a ≠ 0) and perform a simple transformation.

1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-309
Author(s):  
Walter Koetke ◽  
Thomas E. Kieren

ONE of the “old” topics that has been approached in a “new” way in modern mathematics is quadratic equations. No longer do students simply memorize the quadratic formula and do hundreds of exercises using it.


1982 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-136

As a mathematics teacher whose present assignment is to teach science, I was somewhat dismayed when my physics class wa unable to solve a nontrivial quadratic equation. These students are all enrolled in senior-year mathematics and had taken all lower level mathematics courses available in our small Western Kansas high school. They charged this inability to having forgotten the quadratic formula. To the e students the quadratic formula is a magic passkey to solving “unfactorable” quadratic equations. On further di scussion, l discovered that they vaguely remembered having heard of the method of completing the square, but they saw no connection between the quadratic formula and that method of solving a quadratic equation. They could solve simple quadratics by hit-and-miss factoring, but that was their only tool with which to attack this problem.


1985 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-58
Author(s):  
Edward C. Wallace ◽  
Joseph Wiener

Interest in solving quadratic equations has occupied mathematicians for nearly four thousand years. Indeed, by 2000 b.c. the Babylonians had developed a form of the quadratic formula and a method equivalent to completing the square (Eves 1969; Smith 1951). A number of approaches to the solution of quadratic equations are possible. Let's examine some of these alternative approaches to see what new insights we might discover.


2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (552) ◽  
pp. 424-438
Author(s):  
King-Shun Leung

The theory of quadratic equations (with real coefficients) is an important topic in the secondary school mathematics curriculum. Usually students are taught to solve a quadratic equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 (a ≠ 0) algebraically (by factorisation, completing the square, quadratic formula), graphically (by plotting the graph of the quadratic polynomial y = ax2 + bx + c to find the x-intercepts, if any), and numerically (by the bisection method or Newton-Raphson method). Less well-known is that we can indeed solve a quadratic equation geometrically (by geometric construction tools such as a ruler and compasses, R&C for short). In this article we describe this approach. A more comprehensive discussion on geometric approaches to quadratic equations can be found in [1]. We have also gained much insight from [2] to develop our methods. The tool we use is a set square rather than the more common R&C. But the methods to be presented here can also be carried out with R&C. We choose a set square because it is more convenient (one tool is used instead of two).


Author(s):  
Peter M. Higgins

A quadratic equation is one involving a squared term and takes on the form ax2 + bx + c = 0. Quadratic expressions are central to mathematics, and quadratic approximations are extremely useful in describing processes that are changing in direction from moment to moment. ‘Quadratic equations’ outlines the three-stage solution process. Firstly, the quadratic expression is factorized into two linear factors, allowing two solutions to be written down. Next is completing the square, which allows solution of any particular quadratic. Finally, completing the square is applied to the general equation to derive the quadratic formula that allows the three coefficients to be put into the associated expression, which then provides the solutions.


1911 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
Maurice J. Babb

I asked this question of one of my sophomore classes and they all answered, “Algebra!!” Then I asked “What part of algebra?” and they answered, “ Simplification of all kinds of expressions, notion of + and —, transposition, substitution of other expressions for ‘unknowns,’ radicals, use of fractional and negative exponents, binomial theorem, solution of equations in one and two unknowns (either of first and second degree), quadratic equations, especially the theory (this last very emphatic), expressions containing the logarithmic notation, graphs, and the language.”


1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-46

Introduction: Traditionally, the solution of quadratic equations has been taught before, and in isolation from, the study of quadratic functions. The quadratic formula itself has typically been derived by completing the square. Many teachers skip the derivation, and most students who see it do not fully understand it.


1984 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 710-714
Author(s):  
R D. Small

“When you can see an approximate solution the battle is half over.” This statement is the theme of the following method for solving polynomial equations. When the quadratic formula generates solutions of quadratic equations, we gain little insight into the solution process. A little more insight can be gained by using numerical techniques such as those reviewed by Snover and Spikell (1979). since the convergence to the solution can be observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document