Experimental Programs: Prediction of Achievement in College Mathematics

1966 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-369
Author(s):  
Joe F. Wampler

Most previous studies predicting success in college mathematics have used combinations of measures of intelligence and previous knowledge of mathematics as predictors of grades in mathematics courses. While the prediction formulas derived in these studies were useful for the purposes for which they were developed, in none of these studies was more than about 50 percent of the total variations in the criterion variables attributed to their relationship with the prediction variables.

1948 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 350-355
Author(s):  
M. W. Keller ◽  
H. F. S. Jonah

The sectioning or grouping of students taking required college mathematics courses is now a relatively common procedure. O’Quinn1 reports that twenty-seven state universities, out of forty-three replying to his questionaire, used some method for grouping students according to mathematical ability or previous training in mathematics. The criteria used for grouping or sectioning students in mathematics courses were almost as varied as the number of universities which replied that they sectioned their students. In some universities all the students take the same course regardless of the group to which they were assigned, while in others those with the poorer preparation and/or ability were placed in special courses. In general, those universities which favored grouping were also strongly in favor of making adjustments in the amount of material, and type of subject matter to be taught in the different sections. From the O’Quinn report it is evident that there is a rather definite trend in the state universities toward the grouping of students according to ability and/or training.


2014 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 5

In recent years, schools and teachers have been placed under the microscope and even under attack. Evidence such as the great need for college mathematics courses reviewing preparatory content makes it clear that mathematics learning in North America is far from perfect. The question is, How should we proceed?


1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 308-313
Author(s):  
Patricia Pokay ◽  
Carla Tayeh

Traditionally, college mathematics courses have rarely asked students to write or to reflect on their learning, concentrating instead on textbook exercises and problem sets in a lecture format. The intent of this study was to model the use of portfolio assessment in a college mathematics course for preservice teachers while focusing on the contributions of the students' writing in the mathematics classroom. In the study, portfolios were the vehicle for organizing the students' writings.


1981 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-379
Author(s):  
Melfried Olson ◽  
Bob Kansky

Students from a broad range of fields of study at the University of Wyoming have commented that the mathematics courses required for completion of their college programs were posing serious obstacles. When questioned, the students report that they terminated their study of precollege mathematics as early as possible on the assumption(s) that no mathematics was required for the fields they wished to enter and/or that college mathematics courses were available wherein they could correct any mathematical shortcomings. For many students, both assumptions proved erroneous.


1956 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 514-518
Author(s):  
William L. Duren

A mathematician's thoughts on how to revise the high-school mathematics courses so as to minimize the “break” in the mathematics program at the beginning of the thirteenth year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document