The Double Track Plan of High School Mathematics

1943 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Harl R. Douglass

The prevailing high school curriculum in mathematics was formulated very much much as it now exists in the quarter century immediately following the Civil War—1865-1890. In 1890 there were about 250,000 boys and girls in high school—about one in ten of all youth of high school age. Less than three percent of young people were graduating from high school between 1880 and 1890. High schools were almost always looked upon as “prep” schools for “getting” the “bright boys” ready for college. The present high school curriculum in high school mathematics was built for those few who went on—the alber pupils, the college preparatory pupil, the future engineer, physicist, and teacher.

1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Roger P. Day

While teaching junior high school mathematics at the Stavanger American School in Norway. I sensed the need to challenge the students' perceptions of mathematics. The seventh and eighth graders seemed most concerned with producing correct answers. They saw little need for questioning, evaluating, checking, and comparing. They simply wanted to be shown “how to do it.” I set out to implement a problem-solving component within the structure of the junior high school curriculum that would alter this. “right-wrong-produce an anwer” mind set. This article reports my experience and sets forth ideas that may work for you.


2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 486-488
Author(s):  
Al Cuoco ◽  
E. Paul Goldenberg

In a recent “Sound Off” in Mathematics Teacher, Robert Reys and Rustin Reys (2009) contrasted two curricular approaches, what they called “subjectbased” and “integrated.” They came down heavily in favor of the latter, arguing that many of the difficulties that students have with high school mathematics are consequences of the subject–based organization.


1937 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Harl R. Douglass

For a generation there has been con siderable ferment with respect to the place and content of mathematics in the high school curriculum. Two central issues have been prominent: (1) Does mathematics as now taught constitute a more suitable content for the education of the great mass of high school pupils than other subject matter which might be substituted in its place? (2) Should thecontentof high school mathematics be thoroughly re-organized?


1947 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 377-380
Author(s):  
H. C. Trimble

The idea that pressure from the colleges has been a serious obstacle in the way of curriculum reform in the high school is a familiar one. Last spring I had an opportunity to visit a representative sample of Iowa high schools. Because I am employed in college teaching, and because I have heard so much about college domination of high school curriculum, I kept looking for evidences of the influence of the college in shaping the thinking of high school people.


2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-166
Author(s):  
W. Gary Martin

The message of Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making, NCTM's new (2009) publication on high school mathematics, is simple: Reasoning and sense making provide a focus for high school mathematics that will give students a foundation for their future success. This focus continues NCTM's emphasis on mathematical processes that stretches back to the central emphasis placed on problem solving in An Agenda for Action (NCTM 1980) and forward to the Process Standards of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000).


1930 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-51
Author(s):  
L. H. Whitcraft

Teachers of high school mathematics are confronted with the fact that there are more failures in the mathematics of the secondary school than in any other subject in the secondary school curriculum. These failures may be traced to some one of the following factors; (1) the materials of mathematics, consisting of the textbook, practice exercises, and special devices; (2) the teacher's method of instruction and manner of presenting the subject matter to the pupils; or (3) the methods and processes of the pupils themselves. Now that the teachers of mathematics realize that there is a great amount of criticism due the department of mathematics what are they going to do about it? The answer should be the same as the elementary teachers have given to the criticisms which have come to them-give remedial work.


1967 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 547-548
Author(s):  
James E. Inskeep

The modern elementary school teacher deals easily with number sentences, inequalities, and other basic ideas for expressing the characteristics of number relationships. Such an expression as 4 + □ = 7 is common in most primary-grade classrooms. Ideas of negative integers are not unfamiliar to the elementary school pupil. Solution sets cover many a junior high school mathematics class chalkboard. These ideas are not difficult and seem quite natural in the context of the elementary- junior high school curriculum. But, when I went to school, we called it algebra! And we called it algebra in the first year of high school! No sooner.


1948 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
Ida Mae Heard

The original traditional course in high school mathematics was college preparatory in nature. The teacher's time was largely spent in trying to pour facts into the youngsters rather than in drawing the youngsters out or in leading them toward the subject. If a student failed to pass the work, his failure was said to be caused by any of the following: a lack of application, stubborness, or laziness. This course of study made little provision for different interests, different abilities, or different needs.


1966 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-235
Author(s):  
Steven Szabo

Among the central ideas in mathematics today is the notion of a vector space. This concept has many applications in algebra, geometry, and analysis. In addition to its applications, the concept of a vector space can serve to relate the study of algebra and geometry in the secondary school mathematics curriculum. For the most part, the studies of algebra and geometry in the high school curriculum are not at all related. In fact, it is the case in many instances that the study of geometry turns out to be merely a strange interlude between the study of algebra in the ninth grade and the continued study of algebra in the eleventh grade.


1934 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 409-411
Author(s):  
Barnet Rudman

Pupils fail in algebra and geometry because they do not apply themselves, because they have poor study habits, because they are unable or unwilling to give sustained attention, because they lack special preparation—they fail, in short, as a result of the many negative influences that militate against achievement everywhere in the high school curriculum. So, too, does inadequate teaching take its toll in the exact sciences as it does in the social sciences or foreign languages. That the percentage of failures is generally higher in mathematics than in other high school subjects is probably due not to additional specific causes but rather to the nature of mathematical skills on which the same causes are apt to leave more profound and far-reaching effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document