scholarly journals Hematochezia in Patient with Rectal Tumor: Consideration of Various Diagnostic Possibilities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hae Min Jeong ◽  
Chang Seok Bang ◽  
Gwang Ho Baik
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075
Author(s):  
Hyo Jun Kang ◽  
Taik Kun Kim ◽  
Sang Hoon Cha ◽  
Cheol Min Park ◽  
In Ho Cha ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxing Qiu ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Zhongxu Bi ◽  
Xiaowei Sun ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To compare integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming (iShim) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) DWI in image quality and pathological characterization of rectal cancer. Materials and methods A total of 193 consecutive rectal tumor patients were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Among them, 101 patients underwent iShim-DWI (b = 0, 800, and 1600 s/mm2) and 92 patients underwent SS-EPI-DWI (b = 0, and 1000 s/mm2). Qualitative analyses of both DWI techniques was performed by two independent readers; including adequate fat suppression, the presence of artifacts and image quality. Quantitative analysis was performed by calculating standard deviation (SD) of the gluteus maximus, signal intensity (SI) of lesion and residual normal rectal wall, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (generated by b values of 0, 800 and 1600 s/mm2 for iShim-DWI, and by b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 for SS-EPI-DWI) and image quality parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of primary rectal tumor. For the primary rectal cancer, two pathological groups were divided according to pathological results: Group 1 (well-differentiated) and Group 2 (poorly differentiated). Statistical analyses were performed with p < 0.05 as significant difference. Results Compared with SS-EPI-DWI, significantly higher scores of image quality were obtained in iShim-DWI cases (P < 0.001). The SDbackground was significantly reduced on b = 1600 s/mm2 images and ADC maps of iShim-DWI. Both SNR and CNR of b = 800 s/mm2 and b = 1600 s/mm2 images in iShim-DWI were higher than those of b = 1000 s/mm2 images in SS-EPI-DWI. In primary rectal cancer of iShim-DWI cohort, SIlesion was significantly higher than SIrectum in both b = 800 and 1600 s/mm2 images. ADC values were significantly lower in Group 2 (0.732 ± 0.08) × 10− 3 mm2/s) than those in Group 1 ((0.912 ± 0.21) × 10− 3 mm2/s). ROC analyses showed significance of ADC values and SIlesion between the two groups. Conclusion iShim-DWI with b values of 0, 800 and 1600 s/mm2 is a promising technique of high image quality in rectal tumor imaging, and has potential ability to differentiate rectal cancer from normal wall and predicting pathological characterization.


Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (14) ◽  
pp. 3501-3511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Oliva Perez ◽  
Angelita Habr-Gama ◽  
Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues ◽  
Igor Proscurshim ◽  
Guilherme Pagin São Julião ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1937-1942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Akiyoshi ◽  
Yoshiya Fujimoto ◽  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Hiroya Kuroyanagi ◽  
Masashi Ueno ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcelo A. Queiroz ◽  
Cinthia D. Ortega ◽  
Felipe R. Ferreira ◽  
Fernanda C. Capareli ◽  
Sergio C. Nahas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hee Hyun ◽  
Kyung Su Han ◽  
Byung Chang Kim ◽  
Chang Won Hong ◽  
Jae Hwan Oh ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Jacobs ◽  
David B Meek ◽  
Joost van Heukelom ◽  
Thomas L Bollen ◽  
Peter D Siersema ◽  
...  

Background and aim Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used routinely in the diagnostic and preoperative work-up of rectal cancer. We aimed to compare colonoscopy and MRI in determining rectal tumor height. Methods Between 2002 and 2012, all patients with rectal cancer with available MRIs and endoscopy reports were included. All MRIs were reassessed for tumor height by two abdominal radiologists. To obtain insight in techniques used for endoscopic determination of tumor height, a survey among regional endoscopists was conducted. Results A total of 211 patients with rectal cancer were included. Tumor height was significantly lower when assessed by MRI than by endoscopy with a mean difference of 2.5 cm (95% CI: 2.1–2.8). Although the agreement between tumor height as measured by MRI and endoscopy was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.7 (95% CI: 0.7–0.8)), the 95% limits of agreement varied from –3.0 cm to 8.0 cm. In 45 patients (21.3%), tumors were regarded as low by MRI and middle–high by endoscopy. MRI inter- and intraobserver agreements were excellent with an ICC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7–0.9) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), respectively. The survey showed no consensus among endoscopists as to how to technically measure tumor height. Conclusion This study showed large variability in rectal tumor height as measured by colonoscopy and MRI. Since MRI measurements showed excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement, we suggest using tumor height measurement by MRI for diagnostic purposes and treatment allocation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document