scholarly journals Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Comparision of Polypectomy and Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Heon Lee ◽  
Seun Ja Park ◽  
Hyung Hun Kim ◽  
Kyung Sun Ok ◽  
Ji Hyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device

2003 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Ono ◽  
Takahiro Fujii ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Takahisa Matsuda ◽  
Daniel T.Y. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

Selection of Cap Size in Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Cap Aspiration for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 815-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Kyung Sohn ◽  
Kyung Su Han ◽  
Chang Won Hong ◽  
Hee Jin Chang ◽  
Seung-Yong Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection ◽  
Selection Of

The Evaluation of the Endoscopic Submucosal Resection of Rectal Carcinoid Tumors with Ligation Device

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB219
Author(s):  
Takashi Muramoto ◽  
Hiroaki Ito ◽  
Kazuhiro Kaneko ◽  
Toshinori Kurahashi ◽  
Taikan Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

Is a second ligation necessary in endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors?

Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 949-949
Author(s):  
K.-I Fu ◽  
Y. Mashimo ◽  
T. Matsuda ◽  
Y. Saito ◽  
Y. Sano
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

The Effectiveness of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection With a Ligation Device for Small Rectal Carcinoid Tumors

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong-Cheol Im ◽  
Seok Won Jung ◽  
Hee Jeong Cha ◽  
Song-Soo Yang ◽  
Gyu Yeol Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Double Ligation Technique for Treatment of Small Rectal Carcinoid Tumors

Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Moon ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
C. Park ◽  
J. Jung ◽  
W. Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Rectal Carcinoid ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Resection

scholarly journals Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byoung Wook Bang ◽  
Jin Seok Park ◽  
Hyung Kil Kim ◽  
Yong Woon Shin ◽  
Kye Sook Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Complete Resection Rate ◽  
Submucosal Resection

Background and Aims. There is no consensus so far regarding the optimal endoscopic method for treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET). The aim of this study was to compare treatment efficacy, safety, and procedure time between endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR-L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods. We conducted a prospective study of patients who visited Inha University Hospital for endoscopic resection of rectal NET (≦10 mm). Pathological complete resection rate, procedure time, and complications were evaluated.Results. A total of 77 patients were treated by ESMR-L (n=53) or ESD (n=24). En bloc resection was achieved in all patients. A significantly higher pathological complete resection rate was observed in the ESMR-L group (53/53, 100%) than in the ESD group (13/24, 54.2%) (P=0.000). The procedure time of ESD (17.9±9.1 min) was significantly longer compared to that of ESMR-L (5.3±2.8 min) (P=0.000).Conclusions. Considering the clinical efficacy, technical difficulty, and procedure time, the ESMR-L method should be considered as the first-line therapy for the small rectal NET (≤10 mm). ESD should be left as a second-line treatment for the fibrotic lesion which could not be removed using the ESMR-L method.

Endoscopic submucosal resection of esophageal subepithelial lesions using band ligation

Endoscopy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (09) ◽  
pp. 822-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lee ◽  
G. Kim ◽  
D. Park ◽  
J. Jeong ◽  
J. Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Band Ligation ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Subepithelial Lesions ◽  
Submucosal Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document