scholarly journals Strategy of water-flooding enhancement for low-permeable polymictic reservoirs

Author(s):  
Aleksandra Palyanitsina ◽  
Dmitry Tananykhin ◽  
Riazi Masoud

This article pays attention to the issues of increasing the efficiency of the development of oil fields with low-permeable polymictic reservoirs. It is possible to increase the efficiency of this process by improving the technology of their artificial water-flooding. This goal is being realized by identifying the features of the development of low-permeable polymictic reservoirs of fields in Western Siberia and creating a strategy to improve the technology of artificial waterflooding, taking into account the impact on the surface molecular properties of the reservoir system by the stages of their development. The developed strategy was substantiated in stages using hydrodynamic modeling. Also, an assessment was made of the effectiveness of the implementation of low-salinity waterflooding at the late stage of development of low-permeability polymictic reservoirs, the optimal time for changing the waterflooding agent from formation water to fresh water was determined.  

2015 ◽  
Vol 733 ◽  
pp. 174-177
Author(s):  
Xin Yuan Zhao ◽  
Yi Kun Liu ◽  
Feng Jiao Wang ◽  
Ru Ya Chen ◽  
Jin Ming Wang

In order to reveal the impact of reservoir heterogeneity on its recovery and by taking the interlayer heterogeneous and inner layer sand superimposition model (two forms of complexity situation) into account, water flooding experiments have been conducted on parallel connected rock cores, which are selected and artificially casted cores with different permeability, at different injection rates. Experimental results suggested that water displacement recovery is kept decreasing with the increasing of interlayer heterogeneity. when the interlayer permeability ratio (ratio of high permeability versus low permeability) is at about 6.5 and water displacement rate is set at 0.5ml/min, 1ml/min, 1.5ml/min, 2ml/min, respectively, the water flooding experiments indicated that the low permeability recovery increased significantly and low permeability layer became main producer with the increasing of water displacement rate, on the opposite, the high permeability recovery showed no little big change. Laboratory experiments on the model of layer sand body superimposition revealed that the recovery rate of FTRLPTPL model is about 5%~10% higher than that of FTPLPTRL model.(FTRLPTPL is briefed from that flooding from the thick and rich in oil layer and produced from the thin and poor in oil layer. FTPLPTRL is briefed from that flooding from the thin and poor in oil layer and produced from the thick and rich in oil layer.) Analysis on the experiments in different reservoir inner situation told us that recovery enhancement of low permeability layer can play a significant role in increasing the overall recovery rate.


SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 2874-2888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Al–Ibadi ◽  
Karl D. Stephen ◽  
Eric J. Mackay

Summary Low–salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is an emergent technology developed to increase oil recovery. Laboratory–scale testing of this process is common, but modeling at the production scale is less well–reported. Various descriptions of the functional relationship between salinity and relative permeability have been presented in the literature, with respect to the differences in the effective salinity range over which the mechanisms occur. In this paper, we focus on these properties and their impact on fractional flow of LSWF at the reservoir scale. We present numerical observations that characterize flow behavior accounting for dispersion. We analyzed linear and nonlinear functions relating salinity to relative permeability and various effective salinity ranges using a numerical simulator. We analyzed the effect of numerical and physical dispersion of salinity on the velocity of the waterflood fronts as an expansion of fractional–flow theory, which normally assumes shock–like behavior of water and concentration fronts. We observed that dispersion of the salinity profile affects the fractional–flow behavior depending on the effective salinity range. The simulator solution is equal to analytical predictions from fractional–flow analysis when the midpoint of the effective salinity range lies between the formation and injected salinities. However, retardation behavior similar to the effect of adsorption occurs when these midpoint concentrations are not coincidental. This alters the velocities of high– and low–salinity water fronts. We derived an extended form of the fractional–flow analysis to include the impact of salinity dispersion. A new factor quantifies a physical or numerical retardation that occurs. We can now modify the effects that dispersion has on the breakthrough times of high– and low–salinity water fronts during LSWF. This improves predictive ability and also reduces the requirement for full simulation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 355-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonkyeong Lee ◽  
Hyemin Park ◽  
Jeonghwan Lee ◽  
Wonmo Sung

The low-salinity waterflooding is an attractive eco-friendly producing method, recently, for carbonate reservoirs. When ferrous ion is present in the formation water, that is, acidic water, the injection of low-salinity water generally with neutral pH can yield precipitation or dissolution of Fe-minerals by pH mixing effect. FeSO4 and pyrite can be precipitated and re-dissolved, or vice versa, while siderite and Fe(OH)2 are insoluble which are precipitated, causing permeability reduction. Particularly, pyrite chemically reacts with low-salinity water and release sulfate ion, altering the wettability, favorably, to water-wet. In this aspect, we analyzed oil production focusing on dissolution of Fe-minerals and Fe-precipitation using a commercial compositional reservoir simulator. From the simulation results, the quantities of precipitation and dissolution were enormously large regardless of the type of Fe-minerals and there was almost no difference in terms of total volume in this system. However, among Fe-minerals, Fe(OH)2 precipitation and pyrite dissolution were noticeably large compared to troilite, FeSO4, and siderite. Therefore, it is essential to analyze precipitation or dissolution for each Fe-mineral, individually. Meanwhile, in dissolving process of pyrite, sulfate ions were released differently depending on the content of pyrite. Here, the magnitude of the generated sulfate ion was limited at certain level of pyrite content. Thus, it is necessary to pay attention for determining the concentration of sulfate ion in designing the composition of injection water. Ultimately, in the investigation of the efficiency of oil production, it was found that the oil production was enhanced due to an additional sulfate ion generated from FeS2 dissolution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Madi Abdullah Naser ◽  
Mohammed A Samba ◽  
Yiqiang Li

Laboratory tests and field applications shows that the salinity of water flooding could lead to significant reduction of residual oil saturation. There has been a growing interest with an increasing number of low-salinity water flooding studies. However, there are few quantitative studies on seawater composition change and it impact on increasing or improving oil recovery.  This study was conducted to investigate only two parameters of the seawater (Salinity and pH) to check their impact on oil recovery, and what is the optimum amount of salinity and ph that we can use to get the maximum oil recovery.  Several core flooding experiments were conducted using sandstone by inject seawater (high, low salinity and different pH). The results of this study has been shown that the oil recovery increases as the injected water salinity down to 6500 ppm and when the pH is around 7. This increase has been found to be supported by an increase in the permeability. We also noticed that the impact of ph on oil recovery is low when the pH is less than 7.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document