China 10-Point Patent Checklist: Integrating patents into an overall business strategy for a Western manufacturing entity in China

1969 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sun ◽  
Sharon R Barner ◽  
Harold C Wegner

The protection of intellectual property (IP) involved with manufactured goods comprises many aspects: Without even touching upon patents, these aspects include trade secrets and trademark protection, both very important in the classic protection of a pioneer manufacturer's product line and reputation. Yet it is well known that in China, Western companies have had challenges using trade secrets to safeguard IP. Trademark protection also has weaknesses, particularly as competitors often use Chinese marks that are very similar to the trademark – a situation that is difficult to control with typical trademark remedies. The China 10-Point Patent Checklist (Checklist) provides only starting points or guidelines for technology-based outsourcing operations – including biotechnology companies – doing business in China. The Checklist does not address comprehensive enforcement strategies such as deciding where to bring an action: in the United States (or Japan, Germany or another applicable importing country) under Western laws and Western patents, in China itself or in both countries.

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinh H. Pham ◽  
Ross Spencer Garsson

AbstractThe America Invents Act (AIA) presents new challenges and strategy considerations for nanotechnology inventors and companies that seek to protect their intellectual property in the United States. Among the many notable changes, the AIA expands the “prior user rights” defense to infringement and broadens the classes of patents that are eligible for the new limited prior user rights defense. While this defense is limited in some instances, such as against universities, it could be invaluable in others, such as when a competitor independently discovers and patents the trade secret. In the world of nanotechnology, where inventions and products are increasingly complex, this protection can prove to be vitally important.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-223
Author(s):  
Spencer Keller

The current state of cannabis and intellectual property laws and regulations leaves small and emerging cannabis businesses at a distinct disadvantage compared to those in other industries. Those wishing to pursue cannabis inventions and patents face an uphill battle as cannabis research and development is nearly impossible to conduct legally. The difficulty in researching cannabis has pushed companies to move their research outside of the United States, leaving those growing businesses unable to corner their market in the cannabis industry. Complicating matters further are the overly broad patents that cannabis patentees are likely receiving as a result of market participants leaving innovations undocumented due to fear of being prosecuted for their involvement in the industry. Although the cannabis-patenting field is cloudy, businesses can utilize alternative strategies such as state and ancillary trademarks, trade secrets, and first-mover advantages to protect their information and grow their brands.


2021 ◽  
pp. 251512742199252
Author(s):  
Robert A. Boyle ◽  
Jerome A. Katz ◽  
Patricia G. Bagsby

For entrepreneurs, being offered a distribution deal by Walmart seems like a dream come true. After all, what better way to have a new product quickly appear in thousands of stores all around the United States or maybe even all around the world? This dream became a reality for Marty, the creator of Tiny Sips—a simple, wholesome children’s beverage made from Montana spring water and all-natural ingredients. As the details and conditions related to the distribution deal became apparent, however, Marty soon understood that doing business at that level requires sophisticated entrepreneurial savvy and a great deal of capital. The joy of possibly selling Tiny Sips everywhere suddenly became eclipsed by questions about how to raise enough cash to scale quickly while simultaneously minimizing risk. Marty needed to employ the business acumen necessary to slow down, consider the pros and cons, and make the best decision for his company. The educational focus of this case involves weighing the entrepreneurial risks and rewards of pursuing a deal with a large retailer like Walmart. While this type of opportunity may seem exciting at first glance, a variety of factors must be considered in order to find a thoughtful and sensible path forward.


Significance Follow-on action from Washington and responses from foreign actors will shape the US government’s adversarial policy towards China in semiconductors and other strategic technologies. Impacts The Biden administration will likely conclude that broad-based diversion of the semiconductor supply chain away from China is not feasible. The United States will rely on export controls and political pressure to prevent diffusion to China of cutting-edge chip technologies. The United States will focus on persuading foreign semiconductor leaders to help develop US capabilities, thereby staying ahead of China. Washington will focus on less direct approaches to strategic technology competition with China, notably technical standards-setting. Industry leaders in the semiconductor supply chain worldwide will continue expanding business in China in less politically sensitive areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document