scholarly journals Uma perspectiva comparada entre Friedrich Nietzsche e Fernando Pessoa: o filósofo poeta e o poeta filósofo

Author(s):  
João Francisco Pereira Nunes Junqueira ◽  
Thales Vinicius Rodrigues Pinto

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900) e Fernando Pessoa (1888-1935) ocuparam-se das principais temáticas de suas épocas, sendo o primeiro um dos filósofos mais estudado na contemporaneidade e Pessoa considerado o maior poeta da Língua Portuguesa. Na comparação de algumas abordagens dos pensadores surgem semelhanças em temas específicos: o tratamento ao corpo, a questão da linguagem (amplamente estudada e colocada no centro das discussões epistemológicas de suas respectivas épocas), o tempo e a problemática do Ego. Objetiva-se aqui elencar algumas semelhanças entre os dois pensadores, considerando cada um em sua maneira particular de expressão e, a partir disso, salientar possíveis similaridades entre ambos. Importa levar em conta que mesmo Nietzsche sendo filósofo, este também escreve poesias e introduz em seus textos filosóficos elementos poéticos, da mesma maneira, Fernando Pessoa não deixa de registrar em seus versos a influência da filosofia. É a partir destas concepções que se pretende registrar os pontos de consubstanciação de uma obra com a outra, superando inclusive a intenção primeira de pura comparação.

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-265
Author(s):  
Cláudia Franco Souza

Resumo:Neste artigo pretendemos aproximar reflexões sobre a linguagem apresentadas pelo filósofo Friedrich Nietzsche em seu texto Sobre verdade e mentira no sentido extramoral, e a filosofia pagã do heterônimo de Fernando Pessoa, Alberto Caeiro. Utilizaremos no corpus desta análise o texto de Nietzsche já citado, a obra O Guardador de Rebanhos de autoria de Caeiro, e alguns textos em prosa de Fernando Pessoa, António Mora, Ricardo Reis e Álvaro de Campos. O artigo está dividido em três partes: na primeira, mostraremos as leituras que Pessoa realizou sobre a obra de Nietzsche, no segundo momento mostraremos a dinâmica de linguagem que envolve a filosofia pagã de Alberto Caeiro e suas possíveis relações com a crítica realizada pelo jovem Nietzsche sobre a linguagem e no terceiro momento a relação entre o paganismo de Nietzsche e do mestre Caeiro à luz dos escritos de António Mora, Fernando Pessoa e Ricardo Reis.


2003 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Chigres

Partindo das reflexões de Friedrich Nietzsche sobre os tipos de História – História Monumental, História Tradicionalista e História Crítica –, o texto procura analisar e identificar a concepção pessoana, levando em consideração as referências do poeta no que concerne à relação Portugal-Brasil, e suas implicações sociológicas e literárias. Abstract The present study aims to analyze and identify the Pessoa’s conception of History concerning the poet’s ideas about the relationship between Portugal and Brazil and its sociological and literary implications, based on Friedrich Nietzsche’s reflexions about the three notions of History – Monumental, Tradicionalist and Critical.


Temática ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
André Boniatti

O estudo aqui apresentado pretende relacionar a obra “Doutor Fausto”, de Thomas Mann, com as ideias filosóficas de Artur Schopenhauer e de Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, demonstrando como a vida do compositor Adrian Leverkhün coaduna com a emancipação do bem e do mal nietzschiana, a partir da metafísica schopenhaueriana, que vê na música (fisicamente) a essência para todas as coisas. Ao compactuar com o demônio, Leverkhün libera sua genialidade e faz-se senhor de seu destino, passando a criar seus próprios valores, assim sofrendo o castigo trágico sobre sua hamartia. Nesse sentido, a relação aqui proposta é capaz de auxiliar no entendimento acerca da arte como princípio motor independente de moralidade ou preconceitos e mesmo de conceitos pré-estabelecidos, tidos como imutáveis, levando-nos a entender o grande teor essencial e primevo das artes: A plena liberdade do espírito, em ato puro.Palavras-chave: Thomas Mann. Nietzsche. Schopenhauer. Fausto. Literatura alemã.


1915 ◽  
Vol 61 (252) ◽  
pp. 64-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert J. Norman

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was born at Röcken, in Saxony, in 1844. His father was a Lutheran clergyman, and his grandfather held a high official position in the Lutheran Church. His grandmother Nietzsche “came of a family of pastors,” and his mother was the “daughter of a parson”. In view of the strongly antagonistic attitude which Nietzsche afterwards adopted towards the Christian scheme of morality, the marked clerical strain in his ancestry is worthy of note. According to his sister Their ancestors, paternal and maternal, were very long-lived. “Of the four pairs of great-grandparents [one] great-grandfather…reached the age of ninety, five great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers died between seventy-five and eighty-six, two only failed to reach old age. The two grandfathers attained their seventieth year, the maternal grandmother died at eighty-two, and grandmother Nietzsche at seventy-seven.” Nietzsche's mother was also long-lived; she was born in 1826, and was married, in 1843, to Pastor Nietzsche, who was then thirty years old. She died in 1897, “after having suffered ill-health for several years”. Pastor Nietzsche is described by his daughter as being an “extraordinarily sensitive man…any sign of discord, either in the parish or in his own family, was so painful to him that he would withdraw to his study, and refuse to eat or drink, or speak with anybody”. This tendency to seek solitude is worthy of note, as it reappeared in a very marked degree in his son, Friedrich. The father was short-sighted—as was Nietzsche—and, in 1848, this resulted in an accident, the consequences of which were disastrous: he tripped over an obstacle which his defective eyesight had prevented him from observing, and he suffered as a result from concussion of the brain. This shock to the nervous system initiated a train of symptoms—chiefly cerebral—which led to his death eleven months later. The fall may have been the cause of the attack; or, as another biographer says, perhaps “only hastened its approach.” The same writer informs us that Pastor Nietzsche “might have hoped for a fine career had he not suffered from headaches and nerves”. Frau Förster-Nietzsche, however, says that her father had not suffered from headaches prior to the accident. In view of Nietzsche's history, one feels inclined to agree with Halévy, more especially as, where any history of nervous or of mental symptoms of a morbid character are concerned, relatives are usually the last to admit them. Mügge says that Pastor Nietzsche “suffered either from concussion or softening of the brain…doubtless this accident hastened his death”. The youngest of the three children born to Nietzsche's parents, a boy, died just after his second birthday “from teething convulsions”. There was apparently nervous instability in the family; and Ireland says that O. Hansson “learned from a family who knew Friedrich Nietzsche from childhood that a disposition to insanity had been inherited for several generations, both on the father's and the mother's side”. This statement is not in accord with the details of family history as given by Frau Förster-Nietzsche; at the same time, it is, perhaps, no injustice to her to surmise that she was desirous of minimising the pathological aspect of the family heredity, and of laying greater stress upon the more favourable characteristics. When Nietzsche's life-history with its morbid mental vicissitudes is considered, however, it would be surprising if the family annals were found to be clear of all traces of nervous instability.


Organon ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (61) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Marques Duarte

O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o diálogo estabelecido por Álvaro de Campos, heterônimo de Fernando Pessoa, no poema “Saudação a Walt Whitman”, com a poesia do bardo norte-americano e com a filosofia de Friedrich Nietzsche. Os resultados apontam que os influxos whitmanianos e nietzschianos são uma forma de investir o texto de um ímpeto que, embora passageiro, permite ao heterônimo criticar a mediocridade da época e afirmar tanto a sua independência de espírito quanto o seu fazer poético. Palavras-chave: Pessoa-Campos; Whitman; Nietzsche; Saudação a Walt Whitman.


2020 ◽  
pp. 97-111
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Francato
Keyword(s):  

In questo lavoro l'autore, dal vertice di studio di un'opera d'arte colta nei suoi aspetti stilistici e formali, approfondisce la conoscenza della poesia Autopsicografia di Fernando Pessoa. Il poeta portoghese è in grado di trascinare il lettore nei territori della psiche al limite del formularsi del pensiero, muovendosi attraverso il discorso eteronimico e la necessità della finzione. Si tratta di seguire il corso dei movimenti di pensiero interni alla poesia stessa, nell'articolazione dell'esperienza del poeta nell'incontro con il divenire del suo stesso componimento. Tale movimento porterà alla nascita di un'immagine metaforica, esito dell'attivazione della funzione trascendente secondo le teorizzazioni di Jung.   


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-267
Author(s):  
Patrícia Oliveira Da Silva Mcneill
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John Marmysz

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.


Author(s):  
Vanessa Lemm

Readers of Giorgio Agamben would agree that the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is not one of his primary interlocutors. As such, Agamben’s engagement with Nietzsche is different from the French reception of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Georges Bataille, as well as in his contemporary Italian colleague Roberto Esposito, for whom Nietzsche’s philosophy is a key point of reference in their thinking of politics beyond sovereignty. Agamben’s stance towards the thought of Nietzsche may seem ambiguous to some readers, in particular with regard to his shifting position on Nietzsche’s much-debated vision of the eternal recurrence of the same.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document