scholarly journals Effect of weed control methods on weed density and maize (Zea mays L.) yield in west Shewa Orimia, Ethiopia

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amare Tesfay ◽  
Mohammed Amin ◽  
Negeri Mulugeta ◽  
Sileshi Frehiwot
2019 ◽  
pp. 15-22

Weed control is an important agronomic practice that improves growth and maximizes yield in maize. An experiment was carried out to investigate the ‘effect of different weed control methods on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the western highlands of Cameroon. The work was carried out during the 2017/2018 main cropping season from the 14th of March to the 14th of July at the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) Bambui experimental field. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The experiment comprised of seven treatments: weedy check or control (T1), constant hand hoeing (T2), delay hand hoeing (T3), pre-emergence herbicide application of Atrazine 90 DF ( 0.9 kg ha-1) (T4), post-emergence herbicide application of Ultramais 100 SC (1.9 litre ha-1) (T5), pre- herbicide application of Atrazine 90 DF ( 0.9 kg ha-1) + Ultramais 100 SC (1.9 litre ha-1) (T6) and delay post-emergence herbicide application of Ultramais 100 SC (1.9 litre ha-1) (T7). The white maize variety CHC 201 (“KASAI”) was used during the experiment and sown in plot sizes of 4 m x 5 m with a planting density of 80cm by 50cm with 2 plants per station with the aim of achieving a plant population of 50,000 plants ha-1. All agronomic practices were followed from planting to harvesting. The data recorded were plant height, number of green leaves per plant, leaf area, stem girth, days to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking, ear height, ear length, ear girth, number of gain rows per ear, number of gains per ear, 1000 grain weight and grain yield.. The data collected were analyzed with the aid of STATGRAPHICS Plus 5.0 Software and ANOVA was run to find the differences between the various treatments. The highest 1000 grain weight (314.13g) came from the pre-emergence plus post-emergence herbicide application treatment and did not differ significantly (P˃0.05) from the constant hand hoeing treatment (307.83g). The lowest 1000 grain weight (234.67g) was seen in the weedy check treatment. The constant hand hoeing had the highest grain yield (6.27 ton ha-1) and this did not differ significantly (P˃0.05) from the pre-emergence plus post-emergence herbicide application treatment (6.07 ton ha-1). The lowest grain yield (3.18 ton ha-1) was seen in the weedy check treatment. From the study, the pre-emergence plus post-emergence herbicide application may be recommended for increasing maize yield particularly in the case of high scale production.


1983 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. IVANY ◽  
J. R. ENMAN

Forage corn (Zea mays L.) was grown successfully in Prince Edward Island by no-till planting the corn into standing cereal stubble 15–20 cm tall using a Buffalo no-till seeder. Planting with the slot-type shoe in a preliminary experiment in 1978 gave better forage yields than planting with a slice-type shoe mainly because of better plant population achieved. Subsequent experiments in 1979–1981 using the slot-type shoe to no-till plant corn in cereal stubble gave good forage yields when adequate weed control was provided with herbicide treatment. Best control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens L. Beauv.) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber) and crop yields was achieved with glyphosate + atrazine (1.5 + 2.5 kg a.i./ha) or amitrole + atrazine (3.4 + 2.5 kg a.i./ha) applied preemergence after seeding corn and before corn emergence. Control of quack grass and dandelion with glyphosate or amitrole used alone ranged from 71–80%, but paraquat alone did not provide any weed control. Addition of atrazine to paraquat, glyphosate, or amitrole gave improved control of quackgrass and dandelion and higher forage corn yields. Addition of 2.5 kg a.i./ha atrazine gave better results than use of 1.0 kg a.i./ha of atrazine.Key words: Forage corn, no-till seeding, glyphosate, atrazine, aminotriazole, paraquat


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (3-5) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Nurse ◽  
Allan S. Hamill ◽  
James J. Kells ◽  
Peter H. Sikkema
Keyword(s):  
Zea Mays ◽  

1983 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. MOYER ◽  
R. D. DRYDEN ◽  
P. N. P. CHOW

EPTC and the antidotes, R25788 (N, N-diallyldichloroacetamide) and R29148 (2, 2, 5-trimethyl-3-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine) were applied to field plots of corn (Zea mays L.) in the fall or spring from the fall of 1975 to the spring of 1978. Soil samples were taken from selected treatments in the fall of 1977 and spring of 1978. Residues of EPTC, R25788, and R29148 were measured by gas liquid chromatography. Much better weed control and higher corn yields were obtained with spring applications than with fall applications. EPTC at the highest rate of 13.4 kg/ha, without the antidotes, did not injure corn. Over 95% of the EPTC present in the soil on 24 Oct. 1977 had disappeared by 30 May 1978. Levels of EPTC on 30 May 1978 were appreciably higher following spring application. Neither R25788 nor R29148 disappeared faster than EPTC from the surface layer of soil.Key words: EPTC, R25788, R29148, soil residues, corn


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 208-221
Author(s):  
Arben Mehmeti ◽  
Rozafa Fetahaj ◽  
Adem Demaj ◽  
Filloreta Nishori ◽  
Visar Rraci
Keyword(s):  
Zea Mays ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document