scholarly journals Lessons Learned in Community Research Through The Native Proverbs 31 Health Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Kimes ◽  
Shannon L. Golden ◽  
Rhonda F. Maynor ◽  
John G. Spangler ◽  
Ronny A. Bell
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy LeClair ◽  
Jean J. Lim ◽  
Carolyn Rubin

IntroductionThe goal of this project was to document the current state of a community-academic partnership, identifying early successes and lessons learned.MethodsWe employed qualitative methods, semi-structured interviews and document analysis, from 2 data sources to (1) show how the principles of community-based participatory research are enacted through the activities of Addressing Disparities in Asian Populations through Translational Research (ADAPT) and (2) elucidate the barriers and facilitators to adhering to those principles from the perspectives of the members themselves.ResultsIn addition to established community-based participatory research values, understanding individuals’ motivations for participation, the challenges aligning the priorities of community organizations and academic partners, and definitions of success are themes that emerged as key to the process of maintaining this partnership.ConclusionAs the emphasis on community-academic partnerships grows, there is potential for clinical and translational science awards to use community engagement to facilitate translational research beyond the traditional medical spheres of influence and to forge relationships with affected communities.


1991 ◽  
Vol 160 (9) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Shelley ◽  
L. Daly ◽  
I. Graham ◽  
A. Beirne ◽  
R. Conroy ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 109821402199192
Author(s):  
Roni Ellington ◽  
Clara B. Barajas ◽  
Amy Drahota ◽  
Cristian Meghea ◽  
Heatherlun Uphold ◽  
...  

Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in the number of large federally funded transdisciplinary programs and initiatives. Scholars have identified a need to develop frameworks, methodologies, and tools to evaluate the effectiveness of these large collaborative initiatives, providing precise ways to understand and assess the operations, community and academic partner collaboration, scientific and community research dissemination, and cost-effectiveness. Unfortunately, there has been limited research on methodologies and frameworks that can be used to evaluate large initiatives. This study presents a framework for evaluating the Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions (FCHES), a National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)-funded Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center (TCC) for health disparities research. This report presents a summary of the FCHES evaluation framework and evaluation questions as well as findings from the Year-2 evaluation of the Center and lessons learned.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. ar44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Marten DiBartolo ◽  
Leslie Gregg-Jolly ◽  
Deborah Gross ◽  
Cathryn A. Manduca ◽  
Ellen Iverson ◽  
...  

Best-practices pedagogy in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) aims for inclusive excellence that fosters student persistence. This paper describes principles of inclusivity across 11 primarily undergraduate institutions designated as Capstone Awardees in Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s (HHMI) 2012 competition. The Capstones represent a range of institutional missions, student profiles, and geographical locations. Each successfully directed activities toward persistence of STEM students, especially those from traditionally underrepresented groups, through a set of common elements: mentoring programs to build community; research experiences to strengthen scientific skill/identity; attention to quantitative skills; and outreach/bridge programs to broaden the student pool. This paper grounds these program elements in learning theory, emphasizing their essential principles with examples of how they were implemented within institutional contexts. We also describe common assessment approaches that in many cases informed programming and created traction for stakeholder buy-in. The lessons learned from our shared experiences in pursuit of inclusive excellence, including the resources housed on our companion website, can inform others’ efforts to increase access to and persistence in STEM in higher education.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. e001183 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Beran ◽  
Maria Lazo-Porras ◽  
Maria Kathia Cardenas ◽  
François Chappuis ◽  
Albertino Damasceno ◽  
...  

Different methodological approaches for implementation research in global health focusing on how interventions are developed, implemented and evaluated are needed. In this paper, we detail the approach developed and implemented in the COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON (COHESION) Project, a global health project aimed at strengthening health systems in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. This project developed innovative formative research at policy, health system and community levels to gain a comprehensive understanding of the barriers, enablers, needs and lessons for the management of chronic disease using non-communicable and neglected tropical diseases as tracer conditions. After formative research, COHESION adopted a co-creation approach in the planning of interventions. The approach included two interactions with each type of stakeholder at policy, health system and community level in each country which aimed to develop interventions to improve the delivery of care of the tracer conditions. Diverse tools and methods were used in order to prioritise interventions based on support, resources and impact. Additionally, a COHESION score that assessed feasibility, sustainability and scaling up was used to select three potential interventions. Next steps for the COHESION Project are to further detail and develop the interventions propositioned through this process. Besides providing some useful tools and methods, this work also highlights the challenges and lessons learned from such an approach.


Author(s):  
Tabia Henry Akintobi ◽  
Payam Sheikhattari ◽  
Emma Shaffer ◽  
Christina L. Evans ◽  
Kathryn L. Braun ◽  
...  

This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf ◽  
Dominic A. Travis ◽  
Jane Raphael ◽  
Shadrack Kamenya ◽  
Iddi Lipende ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Littleton ◽  
Carol E. Cornell ◽  
James M. Raczynski ◽  
Varena G. Stalker ◽  
Paul G. Greene ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Holbrook ◽  
Wan-Yi Chen

Social service agencies face increasing demands for accountability, emphasizing the necessity of preparing professionals to effectively evaluate practice. University-agency collaborations incorporating service learning can build community research capacity while providing opportunities for application of student research skills. We describe a partnership model between a Master of Social Work program evaluation course and a mobile psychiatric rehabilitation program to design a formative evaluation. Course structure and tasks central to the management of the partnership are described. Agency staff benefited from access to peer-reviewed literature, introduction to standardized assessment instruments, and stimulation of staff discussion and critical thinking around service provision. Students valued the applied research experience including exposure to the agency context and a real-world impact of their work. Lessons learned and implications for university-agency collaborations are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document